| Literature DB >> 32099900 |
Long Zhang1, Hong Jie Gao1, Jianhua Zhang2, Benjamin Badami3.
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are a branch of deep learning which have been turned into one of the popular methods in different applications, especially medical imaging. One of the significant applications in this category is to help specialists make an early detection of skin cancer in dermoscopy and can reduce mortality rate. However, there are a lot of reasons that affect system diagnosis accuracy. In recent years, the utilization of computer-aided technology for this purpose has been turned into an interesting category for scientists. In this research, a meta-heuristic optimized CNN classifier is applied for pre-trained network models for visual datasets with the purpose of classifying skin cancer images. However there are different methods about optimizing the learning step of neural networks, and there are few studies about the deep learning based neural networks and their applications. In the present work, a new approach based on whale optimization algorithm is utilized for optimizing the weight and biases in the CNN models. The new method is then compared with 10 popular classifiers on two skin cancer datasets including DermIS Digital Database Dermquest Database. Experimental results show that the use of this optimized method performs with better accuracy than other classification methods.Entities:
Keywords: Computer-aided diagnosis; Convolutional neural networks; Image segmentation; Skin cancer detection; Whale optimization algorithm
Year: 2020 PMID: 32099900 PMCID: PMC7026744 DOI: 10.1515/med-2020-0006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Med (Wars)
Figure 1A simple skin cancer detection using ordinary CNN
Figure 2The search agent vector assigning of WOA on the CNN
Figure 3The WOA based framework for the structure of the convolutional neural network
Figure 4Some examples of the DermIS and the Dermquest databases
Figure 5(A) learning rate vs. training time, (B) learning rate vs. performance ratio
Comparison of the performance metrics for skin cancer detection
| Method | Performance Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | |
| Proposed CNN/WOA Method | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.95 | 0.91 |
| MED-NODE texture Descriptor[56] | 0.64 | 0.87 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.78 |
| MED-NODE color descriptor [56] | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.83 | 0.75 |
| Spotmole [55] | 0.84 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.85 | 0.69 |
| AlexNet [57] | 0.84 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 0.82 |
| ResNet-50 [59] | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
| ResNet-101 [59] | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.85 |
| VGG-16[58] | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.86 |
| LIN [60] | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.88 |
| Inception-v3 [61] | 0.84 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.84 |
| Ordinary CNN | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.83 |
Figure 6Distribution of classification performance of the methods for skin cancer detection
Figure 7Sample skin cancer detection results: first and third columns: input images, second and fourth column: detected masks based on optimized CNN/WOA method.