| Literature DB >> 32099720 |
Timothy M Griffin1, Albert Batushansky2, Joanna Hudson2, Erika Barboza Prado Lopes2.
Abstract
Background: Obesity increases knee osteoarthritis (OA) risk through metabolic, inflammatory, and biomechanical factors, but how these systemic and local mediators interact to drive OA pathology is not well understood. We tested the effect of voluntary running exercise after chronic diet-induced obesity on knee OA-related cartilage and bone pathology in mice. We then used a correlation-based network analysis to identify systemic and local factors associated with early-stage knee OA phenotypes among the different diet and exercise groups.Entities:
Keywords: Inflammation; Knee; Mouse; Obesity; Wheel running
Year: 2019 PMID: 32099720 PMCID: PMC7031811 DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.05.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Sport Health Sci ISSN: 2213-2961 Impact factor: 7.179
Fig. 1Effect of HF diet and exercise on body habitus, glucose tolerance, and IFP structure. (A) Body mass versus age, running distance, and end-of-study body mass and body fat in animals according to their diet and activity group assignments. Voluntary wheel-running exercise began at 25 weeks. Body mass gain slowed in HF animals during behavior testing and imaging periods (i.e., 23–25 weeks and 34–36 weeks). Exercise caused modest age-dependent reductions in body mass as indicated by hash marks between 25 and 37 weeks of age (#q < 0.05, sedentary vs.exercise in diet and age-matched groups; false discovery rate correction by two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli (Prism 8.0.1)). (B) Fasting blood glucose and GTT AUC values at pre-exercise and post-exercise time points. (C) MRI-measured IFP sizes before and after exercise as well as Sirius red-based collagen content analysis. Change in IFP size (%) = ((VT2–VT1)/ VT1) × 100%. V: volume of IFP size; T1:24 weeks; T2: 36 weeks. For all graphs, values are mean ± SD. Diet and age or activity comparisons were analyzed by two-factor analysis of variance. In tests with significant factor effects, a post hoc analysis was conducted to identify group differences using Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test. Bars not sharing a lowercase letter are significantly different from one another (p < 0.05). ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001; #q < 0.05. AUC = area under the curve; Ex = exercise; GTT = glucose tolerance testing; HF = high fat; IFP = infra-patellar fat pad; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; Sed = sedentary.
Fig. 2Effect of HF diet and exercise on serum adipokines, inflammatory mediators, and growth and repair factors. Serum biomarkers were measured in a subset of animals (n = 6/group) at the study endpoint by Luminex and ELISA-based assays. IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor α, and CCL2 were largely below the level of detection and therefore are not shown. HF diet effects were observed for leptin, IGF-1, and TIMP-1 by two-factor analysis of variance of log-transformed data (p < 0.05). Bars not sharing a lowercase letter are significantly different from one another (p < 0.05; Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test). For all graphs, values are mean ± SD. CCL2 = C-C motif chemokine ligand 2; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HF = high fat; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor 1; IL-1β = Interleukin-1β; IL-6 = Interleukin-6; TIMP-1 = tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1; VCAM-1 = vascular cell adhesion molecule 1.
Fig. 3Effect of HF diet and exercise on mechanical sensitivity and grip strength. (A) Mechanical sensitivity was evaluated by measuring a weighted withdrawal response score to the standardized application of a graded series of von Frey hairs. The score was calculated by multiplying the number of positive responses by the corresponding hair size, summing these response–force values for each hair, and dividing this summed value by the total number of positive responses. Thus, a lower score or a reduction in score indicates a greater level of mechanical sensitivity because it indicates that an animal responded more frequently to the application of smaller-sized filaments. Diet did not alter mechanical sensitivity at 24 weeks, but at 36 weeks mechanical sensitivity was increased in the sedentary and exercise control groups compared to sedentary HF. Change in mechanical sensitivity (%) = ((FT2–FT1)/ FT1) × 100%. F: force; T1: 24 weeks; T2: 36 weeks. (B) Diet and exercise did not alter the absolute grip strength in mice, but when normalized to body weight, grip strength was weaker in HF animals. For all graphs, values are mean ± SD. Bars not sharing a lowercase letter are significantly different from one another (p < 0.05; Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test). #p < 0.05 versus a hypothetical value of 0. HF = high fat.
Fig. 4Effect of HF diet and exercise on knee cartilage and bone structural and OA-related changes. (A) Neither HF diet nor exercise altered the modified Mankin scoring for knee cartilage OA pathology. Sub-component scores were not altered either. (B) Knee site-specific modified Mankin scoring was also not altered by diet or exercise. (C) Semi-quantitative osteophyte scores for anterior and posterior tibial joint margins in the medial compartment. HF diet increased posterior osteophytes under exercise conditions. (D) Subchondral cortical bone mineral density for site-specific locations and trabecular bone mineral density for the proximal tibial epiphysis. The lateral femur subchondral density was lower in sedentary HF animals. (E) Structural trabecular bone changes in the proximal tibia epiphysis. Control diet exercise mice had a higher relative BV/TV and smaller Tb.Sp compared to sedentary HF mice. For all graphs, values are mean ± SD. Diet and age comparisons were analyzed by two-factor analysis of variance. In tests with significant factor effects, group-specific differences were determined by Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test. Bars not sharing a lowercase letter are significantly different from one another (p < 0.05). BMD = bone mineral density; BV/TV = bone volume/total volume; HF = high fat; OA = osteoarthritis; Tb.N = trabecular number; Tb.Sp = trabecular separation; Tb.Th = trabecular thickness.
Fig. 5Exercise correlation networks in control and HF diet mice. Correlation network analysis of (A) control and (B) HF diet exercise groups. Running distance and running phase parameters were correlated to 38 outcome variables falling into 5 categories: mechanobiology, systemic/metabolic, bone, cartilage, and infrapatellar fat (color coded on the plot). Lines show correlations based on Spearman's rank analysis with FDR-corrected significance of q < 0.05, with line thickness proportional to the correlation strength (|r| > 0.6). Correlations between non-running variables are not included in the network. FDR = false discovery rate; HF = high fat.
Fig. 6Analysis of overall correlation networks within each diet and activity group. (A) Local and systemic effects of HF diet and exercise were evaluated by building correlation-based networks for each diet and activity condition. Thirty-eight outcome variables falling into 5 categories (mechanobiology, systemic/metabolic, bone, cartilage, and infrapatellar fat) were evaluated by Spearman's rank correlation analysis, and variables (i.e., “nodes”) with at least 1 significant correlation (i.e., “edge”; p < 0.05) were included in the network (see Appendix 1 for a list of network variables). (B) Venn diagrams comparing unique and shared correlations (edges) between sedentary and exercise cohorts in control diet and HF diet groups. Few correlated outcome variables were shared between sedentary and exercise cohorts in either diet. (C) Primary “first neighbor” network of whole-joint modified Mankin OA scores in control and HF diet animals under sedentary and exercise conditions. Note that the only variables correlated with the whole-joint OA score in the HF diet group were local-joint variables. Ex = exercise; HF = high fat; Med. = medial; Lat. = lateral; Sed = sedentary; OA = osteoarthritis.
Network abbreviations.
| Variable name | Abbreviation | category |
|---|---|---|
| Osteophyte score_anterior | OP_AN | Bone |
| Osteophyte score_anterior posterior average | OP_AP | Bone |
| Osteophyte score_posterior | OP_PO | Bone |
| Subchondral bone mineral density_lateral femur | SBMD_LF | Bone |
| Subchondral bone mineral density_lateral tibia | SBMD_LT | Bone |
| Subchondral bone mineral density_medial femur | SBMD_MF | Bone |
| Subchondral bone mineral density_medial tibia | SBMD_MT | Bone |
| Tibial Epiphysis_bone mineral density | BMD_TE | Bone |
| Tibial Epiphysis_bone volume/total volume | BVTV_TE | Bone |
| Tibial epiphysis_trabecular number | TN_TE | Bone |
| Tibial epiphysis_trabecular spacing | TS_TE | Bone |
| Tibial epiphysis_trabecular thickness | TT_TE | Bone |
| Cartilage damage score_whole joint | CD_WJ | Cartilage |
| Hypertrophic chondrocyte score_whole joint | HC_WJ | Cartilage |
| Modified Mankin OA score_lateral femur | OA_LF | Cartilage |
| Modified Mankin OA score_lateral tibia | OA_LT | Cartilage |
| Modified Mankin OA score_medial femur | OA_MF | Cartilage |
| Modified Mankin OA score_medial tibia | OA_MT | Cartilage |
| Modified Mankin OA score_whole joint | OA_WJ | Cartilage |
| Safranin-O loss score_whole joint | SL_WJ | Cartilage |
| Tidemark duplication score_whole joint | TD_WJ | Cartilage |
| Change in IFP volume_post - pre exercise timepoints (%) | ΔIFP | IFP |
| Infrapatellar fat pad fibrosis (% area) | IFP_F | IFP |
| Infrapatellar fat pad volume | IFP_V | IFP |
| Change in tactile sensitivity_post - pre exercise timepoints (%) | ΔTS | Mechanobiology |
| Grip strength_absolute force | GS_AB | Mechanobiology |
| Grip strength_relative to body weight | GS_BW | Mechanobiology |
| Tactile sensitivity withdrawal force | TS | Mechanobiology |
| Daily running distance_average of Weeks 1, 5, 10 | RD_1-10 | Running activity |
| Daily running distance_Week 1 | RD_1 | Running activity |
| Daily running distance_Week 10 | RD_10 | Running activity |
| Daily running distance_Week 5 | RD_5 | Running activity |
| Running phase (% during dark phase)_average of Weeks 1, 5, 10 | RP_1-10 | Running activity |
| Running phase (% during dark phase)_Week 1 | RP_1 | Running activity |
| Running phase (% during dark phase)_Week 10 | RP_10 | Running activity |
| Running phase (% during dark phase)_Week 5 | RP_5 | Running activity |
| Body fat (%) | BF | Systemic/metabolic |
| Body mass | BM | Systemic/metabolic |
| Fasting blood glucose | FBG | Systemic/metabolic |
| Glucose tolerance test_area under the curve | GTT_AUC | Systemic/metabolic |
| Serum adiponectin | APN | Systemic/metabolic |
| Serum insulin-like growth factor 1 | IGF-1 | Systemic/metabolic |
| Serum interleukin-6 | IL-6 | Systemic/metabolic |
| Serum leptin | LEP | Systemic/metabolic |
| Serum tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 | TIMP-1 | Systemic/metabolic |
| Serum vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 | VCAM-1 | Systemic/metabolic |
Abbreviations: IFP = infra-patellar fat pad; OA = osteoarthritis.