| Literature DB >> 32099589 |
Anunya Opasawatchai1,2, Watchareewan Yolwong3, Walairat Thuncharoen1, Nanthicha Inrueangsri1, Sulak Itsaradisaikul4, Cherapat Sasisakulporn4, Wanlapa Jotikasthira4, Oranart Matangkasombut5,6, Onrapak Reamtong7, Wiparat Manuyakorn4, Wisuwat Songnuan8,9, Ponpan Matangkasombut1,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mosquito allergy is common in tropical countries but remains under-diagnosed. This may be due to the lack of knowledge and diagnostic tools for tropical mosquito allergens.Entities:
Keywords: Allergens; IgE; Insect allergy; Mosquito; Tropical species
Year: 2020 PMID: 32099589 PMCID: PMC7031643 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World Allergy Organ J ISSN: 1939-4551 Impact factor: 4.084
Demographic data.
| Patients (n = 64) | Controls (n = 22) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| (mean ± S.D.) | 11.40 ± 9.99 | 22.59 ± 11.01 | 0.0003 |
| Gender | |||
| Male (%) | 29 (45.31%) | 6 (27.27%) | NS |
| Female (%) | 35 (54.69%) | 16 (72.73%) | NS |
| Residency | |||
| Bangkok and perimeter (%) | 56 (87.50%) | 22 (100%) | NS |
| Other (%) | 8 (12.5%) | 0 (0%) | NS |
p-value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Mann-Whitney test
Fisher's exact test
Fig. 1IgE reactivity to tropical mosquito SGE and western mosquito WBE (a) Correlation between IgE level to A.communis (commercial) and each of the four tropical mosquitoes (as indicated) SGE (in-house ELISA) in mosquito-allergic subjects (Spearman correlation). Comparing IgE level between controls and mosquito-allergic patients to (b) each of the 4 local mosquito species and (c) A. communis (commercial). (Mann-Whitney U test *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). (d) Logistic regression analysis of mosquito-specific IgE as a predictor of mosquito allergy (univariate analysis on the left, multivariate analysis adjusted for age on the right)
Fig. 2Mosquito species geographic distribution affects IgE and IgG sensitization in both patients and controls. (a) Levels of mosquito-specific IgE or (b) IgG to the 4 mosquito species in mosquito allergic patients (left panel) and controls (right panel). (Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn's multiple comparison test *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.)
Fig. 3Pairwise correlations among IgE levels against the four mosquito species. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f). (Spear-Mann ranked correlation *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 4SDS-PAGE of SGE proteins and IgE Immunoblots of mosquito-allergic patient sera to SGE of the four mosquito species. SDS-PAGE of SGE proteins (left), as well as IgE immunoblots (right) from 10 representative patient samples for each of the indicated mosquito species, are shown. Arrows on IgE immunoblots indicate major IgE reactive bands. An arrow on each SDS-PAGE indicates the corresponding protein band cut and subjected to mass spectrometry for the identification of novel allergen
Summary of five new allergens from three mosquito species identified by mass spectrometry.
| Allergen name | Species | Accession number | Biochemical name | Mascot score | Coverage (%) | Experimental MW (kDa) | Theoretical MW (kDa) | Identified peptides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aed al 2 | AAA29348-like | D7 like salivary odorant-binding protein | 70 | 8.7 | 33 | 36.897 | SWHYYK | |
| Aed al 3 | AAV90693 | 30 kDa salivary protein | 154 | 18.5 | 30 | 28.314 | GKLSPITSK | |
| Ano d 2 | AAP68775 | Odorant-binding protein | 74 | 14.3 | 15 | 21.854 | NAVDYNELLK | |
| Cul q 2.01 | AAL16047 | Salivary odorant-binding protein | 196 | 40.9 | 33 | 35.967 | FQQAVQALGTIDSADCLK | |
| Cul q 3 | AAL16046 | Salivary odorant-binding protein 2 | 56 | 13.8 | 35 | 35.179 | GFIQVNNANKGVLEK |
Unique peptide
Fig. 5Amino acid alignment of mosquito allergen groups between mosquito species (a) D7 proteins (Cul q 2, Cul q 3 and Ano d 2) aligned with Aed a 2. (b) Aed a 3 and Aed al 3 alignment. The similarity percentage between each pair is shown in the table below each subfigure. Peptide fragments from mass spectrometry are highlighted in gray.