There is a trend towards the use of magnetic fields in antimicrobial therapy, with variable results. Currently, the use of antibiotics has been the choice to control parasite infections, however side effects constitutes a major concern. In contrast, physical factors have become an effective alternative to drugs.Regarding parasite growth inhibition using physical procedures, in our laboratory it has been demonstrated in vitro inhibition of Entamoeba invadens, and Entamoeba histolytica and Trichomonas vaginalis growth by magnetic fields and bioresonance, respectively (1,2).To date, there are no reports of the effect of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) on T. vaginalis and G. lamblia growth. However, studies have been conducted in protozoans. In this regard, Amaroli et al (3) observed a decreased Dictyostelium discoideum growth after exposure to ELFEMFs. Additionally, Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar growth inhibition was observed after 900 MHz electromagnetic fields treatment (4).In view of this compelling issue involving magnetic field effects on parasites, the present study was undertaken to evaluate ELF-EMFs on T. vaginalis and G. lamblia growth.
Materials and Methods
Parasites
The current study was developed using T. vaginalis GT-13 and G. lamblia IMSS-0989 strains cultured at 37ºC in TYI-S-33 medium, as previously described (5).
Experimental design
The following experimental groups (27 cultures per group) were used: (a) cells exposed to ELF-EMFs at 60 Hz and 2.0 mT, (b) untreated cells, (c) cells treated with Metronidazole (a well-known anti-parasite drug) at 0.14 μg/ml for T. vaginalis and 0.56 μg/ml for G. lamblia, used as positive controls, and (d) cells co-exposed to ELF-EMFs and Metronidazole, at the same concentration of 0.14 μg/ml for T. vaginalis and 0.56 μg/ml for G. lamblia.
Electromagnetic field exposure facilities and measurements
When cultures reached the end of logarithmic phase, they were exposed to a 60 Hz and 2.0 mT ELF-EMF for 72 h. A standardized magnetic field exposure facility of identical characteristics as one used in our previous work (6) was used. This device comprised a coil that was built by winding 340 turns of 1.3 mm diameter enamel insulated copper wire to form a cylindrical solenoid with a radius of 5.27 cm and a length of 25 cm. The solenoid was connected to a step-down transformer and to a variable transformer that was plugged in to a 110 V AC source.Magnetic flux density (rms) was measured using an axial Hall-effect probe (Bell FW 6010 gaussmeter, Orlando, Fl, USA). An oscilloscope (BK-Precision model 2120) was coupled to the system to monitor the resultant field. A 2.0 mT (rms) 60 Hz alternating sinusoidal electromagnetic field was then generated. The electromagnetic field frequency content was nearly pure 60 Hz (<3% total harmonic distortion). To keep the geometry of exposure, a plastic separator was placed inside the solenoid to allow the placement of cultures in predetermined zones where the rms value of the ELF-EMF was homogeneous. The magnetic field ambient background level was < 0.8μT. Moreover, the local geomagnetic field was also measured, setting the gaussmeter in DC mode and by using an axial high sensitivity Hall probe (Integrity Design IDR-321 geo-magnetometer, Essex Jct., VT). The average value was 20 mT within the exposure room.
Co-exposure to magnetic fields and Metronidazole
In order to test the combination of 60 Hz ELF-EMF treatment and Metronidazole (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) on parasite growth, a co-exposure experiment was included. Metronidazole was dissolved in TYIS-33 medium and adjusted to the above cited concentrations. Cultures were co-exposed at the same time for 72 h.
Bioassays
For determining cytotoxicity, trophozoite density was blindly evaluated in triplicate by using a hemocytometer Neubauer chamber.
Statistical analysis
The statistical differences were calculated among groups by using an analysis of variance for normal distributions and the correspondent parametric Turkey test for establishing individual differences. The normality of the data was estimated by means of KolmogorovSmirnov test. All analyses were performed using the SPSS package version 22.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). Differences were considered to be significant when the P values were lower than 0.05. Moreover, the exact P values for individual differences are given in the caption of the figures of results.
Results
In magnetic field-treated cultures, a significant T. vaginalis trophozoite growth inhibition was observed (Fig. 1). In addition, cultures co-exposed to ELF-EMFs and metronidazole showed no significant differences, when compared with cultures treated with metronidazole alone. However, cultures treated with metronidazole showed lower cell density as compared with negative controls, as expected.
Fig. 1:
Effect of 60 Hz sinusoidal magnetic fields at 2.0 mT and 72 h exposure on T. vaginalis trophozoite growth. Bars represent arithmetical grouped means ± standard error. The P values for individual differences are: Untreated cells vs Metronidazole treatment (4.98 × 10–13), untreated cells vs ELF-EMF exposure (3.00 × 10–6), untreated cells vs co-exposure condition (4.98 × 10–13)
Effect of 60 Hz sinusoidal magnetic fields at 2.0 mT and 72 h exposure on T. vaginalis trophozoite growth. Bars represent arithmetical grouped means ± standard error. The P values for individual differences are: Untreated cells vs Metronidazole treatment (4.98 × 10–13), untreated cells vs ELF-EMF exposure (3.00 × 10–6), untreated cells vs co-exposure condition (4.98 × 10–13)In contrast, ELF-EMFs induced G. lamblia increased growth, and no effect of combination with metronidazole was observed, indicating the absence of a synergistic or antagonistic effect (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2:
Effect of 60 Hz sinusoidal magnetic fields at 2.0 mT and 72 h exposure on G. lamblia trophozoite growth. Bars represent arithmetical grouped means ± standard error. The P values for individual differences are: Untreated cells vs Metronidazole treatment (7.51 × 10–12), untreated cells vs ELF-EMF exposure (3.90 × 10–7), untreated cells vs co-exposure condition (5.97 × 10–7)
Effect of 60 Hz sinusoidal magnetic fields at 2.0 mT and 72 h exposure on G. lamblia trophozoite growth. Bars represent arithmetical grouped means ± standard error. The P values for individual differences are: Untreated cells vs Metronidazole treatment (7.51 × 10–12), untreated cells vs ELF-EMF exposure (3.90 × 10–7), untreated cells vs co-exposure condition (5.97 × 10–7)
Discussion
In the current study, we have observed growth alterations in parasite protozoans T. vaginalis and G. lamblia after axenic cultures were exposed to ELF-EMFs. In regard to T. vaginalis, the observed results agreed with our previous report on E. invadens growth inhibition after 2.0 mT exposure (1).In G. lamblia experiments, an increased trophozoite density was shown after exposure to ELF-EMFs. In a previous study, we found an increased human lymphocytes proliferation when exposed to 2.0 mT magnetic fields (6). For instance, Dihel et al (7) observed an increased cell proliferation in cultures of Paramecium tetraurelia exposed to ELF-EMFs.On the other hand, our findings suggested that lower cell counts in T. vaginalis were related to ELF-EMF exposure, which may involve alterations in cell cycle progression. It has been suggested by others that electroporation induced by magnetic fields destroys cell membranes and acts as an antimicrobial procedure (8). Another possibility is that the parasites reacted to magnetic fields in a similar way to that observed under cellular stress. This idea is supported by our observation that there is an increase in heat shock gene transcripts (e.g., hsp70) following exposure to ELF-EMFs (9).Our results showed no synergistic or antagonistic effects of ELF-EMFs and Metronidazole combination. We previously observed an antagonistic effect between magnetic fields and Mitomycin-C on human lymphocytes proliferation (6), and for chromosomal aberrations and sperm morphology in germ cells of mice (10).
Conclusion
ELF-EMFs induced T. vaginalis and G. lamblia growth alterations. However, with the results presented here, we are not supporting nor recommending electromagnetic approaches, rather we showed evidence for a significant and measurable biological effect induced by magnetic fields on parasite protozoans.
Authors: J A Heredia-Rojas; A O Rodríguez-De La Fuente; M del Roble Velazco-Campos; C H Leal-Garza; L E Rodríguez-Flores; B de La Fuente-Cortez Journal: Bioelectromagnetics Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 2.010
Authors: J Antonio Heredia-Rojas; Diana E Caballero-Hernandez; Abraham O Rodriguez-de la Fuente; Gerardo Ramos-Alfano; Laura E Rodriguez-Flores Journal: Bioelectromagnetics Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.010
Authors: J Antonio Heredia-Rojas; Abraham Octavio Rodríguez de la Fuente; Juan Manuel Alcocer González; Laura E Rodríguez-Flores; Cristina Rodríguez-Padilla; Martha A Santoyo-Stephano; Esperanza Castañeda-Garza; Reyes S Taméz-Guerra Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Date: 2010-09-11 Impact factor: 2.416
Authors: J Antonio Heredia-Rojas; Antonio Cayetano Torres-Flores; Abraham O Rodríguez-De la Fuente; Benito David Mata-Cárdenas; Laura E Rodríguez-Flores; María Porfiria Barrón-González; Antonio Cayetano Torres-Pantoja; Juan M Alcocer-González Journal: Exp Parasitol Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 2.011
Authors: Abraham O Rodríguez-De la Fuente; J Antonio Heredia-Rojas; Benito David Mata-Cárdenas; Javier Vargas-Villarreal; Laura E Rodríguez-Flores; Isaías Balderas-Candanosa; Juan M Alcocer-González Journal: Exp Parasitol Date: 2008-02-02 Impact factor: 2.011