Literature DB >> 3209954

Changes in feeding and foraging patterns as an antipredator defensive strategy: a laboratory simulation using aversive stimulation in a closed economy.

M S Fanselow1, L S Lester, F J Helmstetter.   

Abstract

The effects of the risk of electric shock on the meal patterns of rats living in an operant chamber were investigated. Rats could obtain food by working on a response lever that provided reinforcement according to chained fixed-ratio continuous reinforcement schedules that allowed the animals control over meal size. Using a two-compartment operant chamber with a safe nesting area and manipulanda area with a grid floor, shock could be correlated with responding on the schedule. Shocks (less than or equal to 1.25 per hour) were scheduled to occur randomly throughout the day, independent of the rat's behavior. Shock caused a reorganization of meal patterns such that the animals took less frequent but larger meals. This pattern reduced the time the animals spent at risk without compromising caloric balance. Similar changes in feeding pattern were obtained in both hooded and albino rats. Exposure to shock in a separate chamber did not produce these behavioral modifications. The magnitude of shock-induced alterations of meal patterns was greater with chained fixed-ratio 90 continuous reinforcement than with chained fixed-ratio 10 continuous reinforcement. Additionally, the rats seemed to be able to reduce food intake but increase caloric efficiency, such that the reduced food intake did not have deleterious effects on maintenance of body weight. These behavioral modifications reduced the number of shocks received from that which would have been expected if meal pattern changes had not occurred. We suggest that this technique may provide a useful laboratory simulation of the impact that the risk of predation has on foraging behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3209954      PMCID: PMC1338904          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Duration-reduction of avoidance sessions as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  M Mellitz; P N Hineline; W G Whitehouse; M T Laurence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Aversive control: A separate domain?

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The ecological determinants of reinforcement in the rat.

Authors:  G Collier; E Hirsch; P H Hamlin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1972 Nov-Dec

5.  Innate and conditioned reactions to threat in rats with amygdaloid lesions.

Authors:  D C Blanchard; R J Blanchard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1972-11

6.  Crouching as an index of fear.

Authors:  R J Blanchard; D C Blanchard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1969-03

7.  Conditioned and unconditional components of post-shock freezing.

Authors:  M S Fanselow
Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci       Date:  1980 Oct-Dec

8.  Ontogeny of defensive reactions in Norway rats.

Authors:  P M Bronstein; S M Hirsch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1976-07

9.  Shock-induced analgesia on the formalin test: effects of shock severity, naloxone, hypophysectomy, and associative variables.

Authors:  M S Fanselow
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Exposure to a cat produces opioid analgesia in rats.

Authors:  L S Lester; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  26 in total

1.  Ingestion and emotional health.

Authors:  N K Dess
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1991-09

2.  Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear.

Authors:  M S Fanselow
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

3.  Amygdala and periaqueductal gray lesions only partially attenuate unconditional defensive responses in rats exposed to a cat.

Authors:  Beatrice M de Oca; Michael S Fanselow
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec

4.  Brain dynamics of visual attention during anticipation and encoding of threat- and safe-cues in spider-phobic individuals.

Authors:  Jaroslaw M Michalowski; Christiane A Pané-Farré; Andreas Löw; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Amygdaloid and non-amygdaloid fear both influence avoidance of risky foraging in hungry rats.

Authors:  Earnest Kim; Eun Joo Kim; Regina Yeh; Minkyung Shin; Jake Bobman; Franklin B Krasne; Jeansok J Kim
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Light stimulus change evokes an activity response in the rat.

Authors:  Bill P Godsil; Michael S Fanselow
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Graded fear generalization enhances the level of cfos-positive neurons specifically in the basolateral amygdala.

Authors:  Abha K Rajbhandari; Ruoyan Zhu; Cora Adling; Michael S Fanselow; James A Waschek
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  The Role of Learning in Threat Imminence and Defensive Behaviors.

Authors:  Michael S Fanselow
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 9.  Feeding behavior, obesity, and neuroeconomics.

Authors:  Neil E Rowland; Cheryl H Vaughan; Clare M Mathes; Anaya Mitra
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-15

10.  Stathmin reveals dissociable roles of the basolateral amygdala in parental and social behaviors.

Authors:  Guillaume Martel; Akinori Nishi; Gleb P Shumyatsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.