| Literature DB >> 32099499 |
Olga Scudiero1,2, Luca Gentile2, Annaluisa Ranieri1,2, Eduardo Coppola3, Pierpaolo Di Micco4, Cristina Mazzaccara1,2, Giovanni D'alicandro5, Eleonora Leggiero2, Giulia Frisso1,2, Lucio Pastore1,2, Barbara Lombardo1,2.
Abstract
The role of influence on protein C anticoagulant system and PC deficiency-related thrombophilic risk due to strenuous physical exercise is still under discussion. To investigate the modification of the protein C anticoagulant pathway after vigorous exercise, we measured ProC® Global assay, a protein C activity dependent clotting time, in 20 healthy subjects before and immediately after maximal treadmill exercise, and at 5, 15, 30 and 60 min in the recovery phase. The most evident change was a shortening of ProC® Global clotting time from the average basal value of 123 sec to 84 sec at 30 min in post-exercise. Our study shows that the coagulation unbalance observed after strenuous exercise and with no consequence in healthy individuals with normal PC level, could increase the thrombophilic risk in silent carriers of significant defects of the protein C system and occasionally trigger an episode of deep vein thrombosis.Entities:
Keywords: ProC® Global; physical exercise; thrombophilic risk; protein C unbalance after physical exercise
Year: 2020 PMID: 32099499 PMCID: PMC6996552 DOI: 10.2147/JBM.S220566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Blood Med ISSN: 1179-2736
Time Course of APTT and PROC Test in Subjects Undergoing a Maximal Treadmill Test. Sampling and Assays Were Done Before Exercise, at Peak (Immediately After Ending Exercise) and at 5, 15, 30, 60 Min After (Recovery Phase)
| BASAL | PEAK | 5’ | 15’ | 30’ | 60’ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APTT (SEC) | 37.5 | 36.0 | 36.0 | 34.0 | 35.5 | 36.5 |
| 35.0–42.0 | 33.0–42.2 | 32.0–41.0 | 31.0–39.3 | 32.3–38.0 | 33.3–40.0 | |
| 32.0–56.0 | 30.0–47.0 | 28.0–45.0 | 28.0–48.0 | 30.0–47.0 | 31.0–47.0 | |
| PROC (SEC) | 123.0 | 109.0* | 101.0** | 87.0** | 84.5** | 115.5 |
| 114.7–152.3 | 102.7–126.5 | 88.3–111.5 | 74.3–96.8 | 78.3–91.0 | 109.2–134.0 | |
| 104.0–18.0 | 89.0–164.0 | 79.0–131.0 | 70.0–115.0 | 75.0–111.0 | 95.0–167.0 |
Notes: Values are expressed as median, interquartile range (25th−75th percentile) and range (min-max) Comparison with basal levels: *p<0.05; **p<0.001.