Literature DB >> 32099460

Deficient Regulatory Innate Lymphoid Cells and Differential Expression of miRNAs in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Quantified by Next Generation Sequence.

Jifeng Yu1, Yingmei Li1, Yue Pan1, Yu Liu1, Haizhou Xing1, Xinsheng Xie1, Dingming Wan1, Zhongxing Jiang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new regulatory subpopulation of ILCs, ILCreg has been identified in mouse and human intestines. ILCregs share characteristics with both innate lymphoid cells and regulatory cells; however, the significance of CD45+Lin-CD127+IL-10+ ILCregs in patients with AML remains unclear. Intriguingly, ILCregs constitutively express id2, id3, sox4, tgfbr1, tgfbr2, il2rb and il2rg, but the significance of miRNAs associated with these genes has yet to be explored. In this study, we evaluate ILCreg frequency, ILCreg gene-associated miRNA quantification, and its significance in patients with AML and normal donors.
METHODS: Using 4 color combinations of surface and intracellular antibody staining, the CD45+Lin-CD127+IL-10+ ILCregs from 12 normal donors and 42 patients newly diagnosed with AML were measured by flow cytometry. Plasma samples and bone marrow cells from 6 normal donors and 9 patients with AML were studied by next-generation sequence miRNAs quantification.
RESULTS: Our results showed that the frequency of ILCregs was 0.8924±1.3791% in bone marrow (BM) cells from normal donors and 0.2434±0.5344% in BM cells from AML patients. The frequency of ILCreg cells in AML patients was significantly lower than that in normal donors (P<0.01). Furthermore, the frequency of the CD45+Lin-CD127+IL-10- subset was 4.0869±6.7701% and 0.2769±0.2526% from normal donors and AML patients, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference of CD45+Lin-CD127+IL-10- cells between normal donors and AML patients (p<0.01). miRNA detection results showed 376 miRNAs from plasma and 182 miRNAs from BM cell samples with expression levels with a statistically significant difference between AML patients and normal donors (both Q and P-value < 0.001). Analysis of miRNAs from ILCregs associated genes including id2, id3, sox4, tgfbr1, tgfbr2, il2rb, and il3rg, from normal donors and AML patients demonstrated 34 miRNA from plasma samples and 14 miRNA segments from BM cell samples with a statistically significant difference between AML patients and normal donors (both Q and P-value <0.001). Among them, 4 miRNAs (hsa-miR-193b-3p, hsa-miR-1270, hsa-miR-210-3p, and hsa-miR-486-3p) were detected in both plasma and BM cell samples.
CONCLUSION: Our study enumerated ILCregs, then measured miRNAs from those ILCregs in AML samples for the first time. The results demonstrated the deficiency of ILCreg and differential expression of miRNAs in patients with AML.
© 2019 Yu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AML; FCM; ILCregs; acute myeloid leukemia; flow cytometry; miRNAs; next generation sequence; regulatory innate lymphoid cells

Year:  2019        PMID: 32099460      PMCID: PMC6997219          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S234327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


Introduction

Innate lymphoid cell (ILC) is a kind of innate immune lymphocyte discovered in recent years. Following the traditional classification method of T cells, it has been classified into ILC1, ILC2, and ILC3 subsets: group 1 comprises natural killer (NK) cells and ILC1s, group 2 comprises ILC2, and group 3 comprises ILC3.1 For clarity, the term ILCs will only refer to ILC1, ILC2, and ILC3 not to conventional NK cells. ILCs have been described to have a lymphoid morphology but lack rearranged antigen receptors and can secrete various cytokines.2 Although ILCs express CD127, the cell surface receptors of most hematopoietic lineages (lin) are absent.3 ILC1s are described as CD45+Lin−CD127+CD161+CD117−CRTH2−,4 ILC2s as CD45+Lin−CD127+CD161+CD117±CRTH2+,5 ILC3s as CD45+Lin−CD127+CD161+CD117+CRTH2−,6,7 and NK cells as CD45+Lin−CD161+CD94+CD56+.8 Human ILCs have been identified in various tissues including peripheral blood9 and cord blood.10 Recently, a flow cytometric Optimized Multicolor Immunofluorescence Panel (OMIP) for characterization of human innate lymphoid cells from neonatal and peripheral blood has been suggested.11 In 2017, Wang et al discovered a sub-group of ILC cells with phenotype of Lin-CD45+CD127+IL-10+ by flow cytometry in the intestines of mice and humans and named them regulatory innate lymphoid cells (ILCregs).12,13 While the morphology of these cells has similar characteristics of lymphocytes, they do not express CD4 and FoxP3, and are therefore not Tregs.14 These cells express ILC markers such as CD25 (IL-2Ralpha) and CD90 (Thy1), and over-express IL-2R gamma and SCA-1, but they do not express ILC1 markers (NK1.1, NKp46), ILC2 markers (ST2 and KLRG1), ILC3 markers (NKp46, CD4, and RORγt) and white blood cell markers.15,16 Infusion of ILCregs can prevent congenital colitis, alleviate inflammatory bowel disease, save Rag1 -/-IL10 -/- mice, and amplified in DSS-stimulated models. Flow cytometry assay showed that the highest proportion of the cells in the lamina propria of small intestine was 13.1% and 15.7%, in mice and human, respectively. Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry methods were also used to verify the presence of these cells in human and mouse intestines.12,13 Since newly confirmed ILCregs may exist in both mouse and human intestines and bone marrow, the function and mechanism of ILCregs in patients of acute myeloid leukemia are still unclear and no relevant research reports have been reported yet. Therefore, based on the knowledge of ILCregs and AML, we hypothesize that ILCregs may be deficient in the patients of AML. In this study, we explore the expression levels of the CD45+Lin−CD127+IL-10+ ILCregs population and its CD45+Lin−CD127+IL-10− subset population, evaluating the clinical significance between the normal donors and patients with AML by using the 4 color monoclonal antibody combination detected by flow cytometry. miRNAs are 19–22 nucleotides long non-coding RNAs which regulate the expression of genes by sequence-specific binding to mRNA to either promote or block its translation.17 This is a powerful level of epigenetic control for gene expression that can influence the phenotype of a cell.18 In recent years, regulation of miRNAs is extensively studied for their role in biological processes as well as in the development and progression of various human diseases, miRNAs hold huge potential for diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers as well as predictors of drug response.19 Insights into the roles of miRNAs in development and disease, particularly in cancer have made miRNAs attractive tools and targets for novel therapeutic approaches.20 Some studies have shown miRNAs play a role in blocking differentiation of leukemic cells and promoting their unchecked cell division.21,22 To further explore the importance of miRNA in patients of AML and the relationship of miRNA with the frequency of ILCregs, we used the next-generation sequence (NGS) method to measure the miRNA from both plasma and BM mono-nuclear cell samples. We compared the expression levels of miRNAs from AML patients to normal controls to find a statistically significant increase or decrease in expression levels of approximately 3280 miRNA sequences. Analysis of miRNAs in ILCreg-associated genes yields further information regarding statistically significant changes in expression.

Methods

Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The bone marrow samples were obtained from 42 patients newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia prior to the induction chemotherapy were obtained following written informed consent from patients and/or their legal guardians at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from September 2018 to August 2019. Study protocols were approved by Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, Henan, China) and based on the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects of the Helsinki Declaration. Diagnosis was done according to the standard diagnosis with MICM criteria based on the 2016 WHO AML Classification23 and the 2017 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines.24 All clinical data regarding patients are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical Characteristics of AML Patients

Total Patients=42Mean±SDRange (%)
Age (year-old)4816-74
Gender Males (n, %)2047.62%
WBC (x10*9/L)30.48±48.820.32–230.00
Hb (g/L)82.01±16.6539.00–123.00
Plate (x10*9/L)45.17±42.935.00–210.00
Blast in BM53.10±26.7812.80–96.40
Complex karyotype (%)8/4219.1
Fusion Genes (%)9/4221.4
Gene mutations (%)36/4285.7
Clinical Characteristics of AML Patients

Control Group

In the control group, 12 bone marrow samples from 6 male and 6 female normal donors with the age of 20–55 years old were obtained following written informed consent from healthy volunteers and tested side by side with some of the AML patients’ samples.

Regulatory Innate Lymphoid Cell Immunophenotyping by Multicolor Flow Cytometry

Freshly obtained samples up to 4 hrs from the collection were processed for flow cytometry assay. Bone marrow samples were collected and cultured in media containing 1:1000 BD GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences, USA) for 4 hr at 37°C. Cells were harvested and stained with surface markers CD45-FITC (BD Biosciences, USA, Cat # 555482), Lineage-APC (BD Biosciences, USA, Cat# 562722), CD127-PE-Cy7 (BD Biosciences, USA, Cat # 560822) for 15 mins. Red blood cells were lysed with lysing buffer (BD Biosciences, USA, Cat # 555899). Cells were then fixed and permeablized by BD Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer set (BD Biosciences, USA, Cat# 555028) after surface marker staining, followed by application of anti-IL-10-PE (BD Biosciences, USA, Cat#554498) antibody (JES5-9D7) staining intracellular IL-10 before analysing through flow cytometry. The readout was done with Beckman Coulter Gallios 4-laser and 10-color model flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, USA). Data analysis was done by using FlowJo software (BD Biosciences, USA).

Gating Strategy

Single-cell populations with SSC vs FSC were selected and were further gated on the CD45+Lin− population. Furthermore, gating of CD127+IL-10+ and CD127+IL-10− sub-population was done by different fluorescence-conjugated antibodies combinations. Regulatory innate lymphoid cells were identified as CD45+Lin−CD127+IL-10+ population. At least a total of 1 million cells were collected for analysis of ILCreg cells. A representative example of ILCreg subpopulation is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

ILCregs from normal donors and AML patients.

Notes: The different expression patterns of ILCregs from normal donors (right panel) and AML patients (left panel) are shown in Figure 1. Single-cell populations with SSC vs FSC were selected and were further gated on the CD45+Lin- population. Furthermore, gating of CD127+IL-10+ and CD127+IL-10- sub-population was done by different fluorescence-conjugated antibodies' combinations. Regulatory innate lymphoid cells were identified as CD45+Lin-CD127+IL-10+ population. At least a total of 1 million cells were collected for analysis of ILCreg cells.

ILCregs from normal donors and AML patients. Notes: The different expression patterns of ILCregs from normal donors (right panel) and AML patients (left panel) are shown in Figure 1. Single-cell populations with SSC vs FSC were selected and were further gated on the CD45+Lin- population. Furthermore, gating of CD127+IL-10+ and CD127+IL-10- sub-population was done by different fluorescence-conjugated antibodies' combinations. Regulatory innate lymphoid cells were identified as CD45+Lin-CD127+IL-10+ population. At least a total of 1 million cells were collected for analysis of ILCreg cells.

Samples Preparation for RNA Extraction & miRNA Library Construction

Fresh bone marrow samples from 10 AML patients and 6 normal donors were obtained for miRNA testing. Plasma and mono-nuclear cells were collected with Ficoll-Hypaque centrifugation method. Mono-nuclear cells were collected and washed once with PBS. Plasma and mono-nuclear cell samples were put into RNA preparation tubes and stored at −80°C for batch processing. The RNA samples were centrifuged at 12,000×g for 5mins at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a new 2.0mL tube which was added 0.3mL of Chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24:1) per 1.5mL of Trizol reagent. After the mix was centrifuged at 12,000×g for 10mins at 4°C, the aqueous phase was transferred to a new 1.5mL tube which added equal volume of supernatant of isopropyl alcohol. The mix was centrifuged at 12,000×g for 20mins at 4°C and then removed the supernatant. After washed with 1mL 75% ethanol, the RNA pellet was air-dried in the biosafety cabinet and then dissolved by add 25µL~100µL of DEPC-treated water. Subsequently, total RNA was qualified and quantified using a Nano Drop and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). Library was prepared with 1μg total RNA for each sample. Total RNA was purified by electrophoretic separation on a 15% urea denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gel and small RNA regions corresponding to the 18–30 nt bands in the marker lane (14–30 ssRNA Ladder Marker, TAKARA) were excised and recovered. Then, the 18–30 nt small RNAs were ligated to adenylated 3’ adapters annealed to unique barcodes, followed by the ligation of 5’ adapters. The adapter-ligated small RNAs were subsequently transcribed into cDNA by SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) and then several rounds of PCR amplification with PCR Primer Cocktail and PCR Mix were performed to enrich the cDNA fragments. The PCR products were selected by agarose gel electrophoresis with target fragments 110~130 bp, and then purified by QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). The yield and quality of the RNA samples was assessed using the Agilent Bioanalyzer prior to library construction using the Illumina TruSeq Small RNA Sample Prep protocol (Illumina; San Diego, California). Multiplexed samples of RNA that exceed quality control metrics (RIN > 6.0) were run on an Illumina NextSeq500 instrument at a targeted depth of 10 million reads per sample. After filtering and trimming of index and adapter sequences, whole-genome alignment of the miR FASTQ reads was performed using the Homo sapiens/hg21 reference genome in the SHRiMPS aligner included in the miRNAs analysis application available in BaseSpace (Illumina), as well as the sRNA Toolbox application suite.

Statistical Analysis

Clinical data, laboratory findings from the patients were collected in the spreadsheet constructed in Microsoft Excel software for Windows 10 (Microsoft). Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 17.0 (IBM, USA). For intra-group comparison, Student’s t-test was used. Significance level was p < 0 05. The analysis of the RNA-seq data was performed following the pipeline available from the limma packages in the Bioconductor project. Log2counts per million (logCPM) transformation was applied before normalization and linear model fitting. Empirical Bayes moderation was carried out to obtain robust estimates of gene-wise variability and the final p values from the linear model with appropriately designed contrasts were adjusted by the Benjamin–Hochberg procedure for a targeted false discover rate of 0.05. Volcano plots and box plots were used to graphically examine the differences between groups.

Results

Patient Cohort: Clinical Characteristics

A total of 42 newly diagnosed AML patients, including 20 males and 22 females, were included in this study. The clinical manifestations of these patients were summarized (Table 1). The median age at diagnosis was 48 years (range 16–72 years). 12 normal donors including 6 males and 6 females with the age of 20–55 years old were used for controls.

ILCregs Detection by Flow Cytometry

The percentage of individual subpopulations of ILCregs in the bone marrow from patients with acute myeloid leukemia was determined. Using the 4 color monoclonal antibody combination, we measured the ILCregs defined as CD45+Lin−CD127+IL-10+ in the BM from both normal donor and AML patients. The different expression patterns of ILCregs from normal donors (right panel) and AML patients (left panel) are shown in Figure 1. Comparison of ILCreg numbers in the bone marrow between normal donors and patients with acute myeloid leukemia are shown as box plots below (Figure 2). The average frequencies of ILCregs were 0.8924±1.3791% and 0.2434±0.5344% for normal donors and patients with AML, respectively. In comparison with the normal donors, the frequency of ILCregs cells in AML patients was significantly lower (P<0.01). Interestingly, the average frequency of CD45+Lin−CD127+IL-10− subset was 4.0869±6.7701%and 0.2769±0.2526% for normal donors and AML patients, respectively. In comparison with the normal donors, the frequency of CD45+Lin−CD127+IL-10− cells in AML patients was also significantly lower (P<0.01).
Figure 2

Boxplots showing positive percentages of ILCregs and CD127+IL-10- cells with a statistically significant difference between control and AML patient bone marrow samples.

Notes: In comparison with the normal donors, the frequency of CD45+Lin-CD127+IL-10+ ILCregs and CD45+Lin-CD127+IL-10- cells in AML patients was significantly lower (P<0.01).

Boxplots showing positive percentages of ILCregs and CD127+IL-10- cells with a statistically significant difference between control and AML patient bone marrow samples. Notes: In comparison with the normal donors, the frequency of CD45+Lin-CD127+IL-10+ ILCregs and CD45+Lin-CD127+IL-10- cells in AML patients was significantly lower (P<0.01).

miRNAs Sequenced by NGS

Furthermore, we sequenced miRNAs from both plasma and BM cells samples from 9 patients with newly diagnosed AML and 6 normal donors by using the next-generation sequence method. We obtained sequence for 3280 miRNAs and averaged the amount of each miRNA from 9 AML patients and 6 controls. Levels of miRNA expression were compared with a t-test while the P-values and Q values were calculated for each miRNA. Different miRNA patterns were found from both BM cell samples and plasma samples between the AML patients and normal donors. There were 62 miRNAs up-regulated and 120 miRNAs down-regulated from the AML BM cell samples and 103 miRNAs up-regulated and 273 miRNAs down-regulated from the plasma samples from the box plots shown below (Figure 3). The pathway-related expression patterns were also analyzed and shown below (Figure 4).
Figure 3

Differential miRNA expression in AML patients BM cells versus plasma.

Notes: Up-regulated and down-regulated genes from the AML BM cell and plasma samples comparing to the normal donors as the box plots shown below (Figure 3 box plots).

Figure 4

Kegg pathway-related expression patterns were analyzed and shown in AML patients.

Differential miRNA expression in AML patients BM cells versus plasma. Notes: Up-regulated and down-regulated genes from the AML BM cell and plasma samples comparing to the normal donors as the box plots shown below (Figure 3 box plots). Kegg pathway-related expression patterns were analyzed and shown in AML patients. In our analysis of plasma samples from 9 AML patients with 6 controls, there were 376 miRNAs with expression levels that showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001). Meanwhile, in the BM cell samples from AML patients and normal controls, there were 182 miRNAs with expression levels that showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001). This was also revealed in a heatmap and cluster analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs of AML patients and normal donors (data not shown). The fold change analysis shows the miRNA differential signature between the AML patients BM cell samples and plasma samples. The color pattern describes the level of expression: red shows miRNAs with down-regulated expression, black shows miRNAs with unchanged expression among the samples, and green shows those miRNAs with up-regulated expression. The size of the branches represents the Euclidian distance of the average expression of the miRNAs. In Figure 5–7, miRNA of BM cell samples from 9 AML patients versus 6 control is shown as below. Log2 Fold Change is shown on the x-axis and –log10 p-value is shown on the y-axis. Points in bold font indicate miRNAs with statistically significant log fold change and adjusted p-value, green color indicated down-regulation and red color indicated up-regulation. Figure 5 shows the volcano plot for the BM cell samples of patients versus controls with 1053 miRNAs having statistically significant change in expression, 56 down-regulated and 24 up-regulated. Similarly, Figure 6 shows the difference of plasma samples from AML patients and normal donors with 135 statistically significant changes in miRNA expression, including 16 down-regulated and 18 up-regulated. Figure 7 shows the volcano plot for the difference of plasma samples and BM cell samples from AML patients with 454 statistically significant changes in miRNA expression, including 162 down-regulated and 9 up-regulated. Clearly, the subset analysis identified a greater number of miRNAs with statistically significant changes in expression in the AML patients.
Figure 5

Volcano plot: BM cell samples from AML patients vs normal donors.

Notes: BM cell samples from AML patients vs normal donors. Log2 Fold Change is shown on the x-axis and–log10 p-value is shown on the y-axis. Points in bold font indicate miRNAs with statistically significant log fold change and adjusted p-value, green color indicated down-regulation and red color indicated up-regulation.

Figure 7

Volcano plot: Plasma samples vs BM cell samples from AML patients.

Notes: Difference of plasma samples and BM cell samples from AML patients. Log2 Fold Change is shown on the x-axis and–log10 p-value is shown on the y-axis. Points in bold font indicate miRNAs with statistically significant log fold change and adjusted p-value, green color indicated down-regulation and red color indicated up-regulation.

Figure 6

Volcano plot: Plasma samples from AML patients vs normal donors.

Notes: Log2 Fold Change is shown on the x-axis and–log10 p-value is shown on the y-axis. Points in bold font indicate miRNAs with statistically significant log fold change and adjusted p-value, green color indicated down-regulation and red color indicated up-regulation.

Volcano plot: BM cell samples from AML patients vs normal donors. Notes: BM cell samples from AML patients vs normal donors. Log2 Fold Change is shown on the x-axis and–log10 p-value is shown on the y-axis. Points in bold font indicate miRNAs with statistically significant log fold change and adjusted p-value, green color indicated down-regulation and red color indicated up-regulation. Volcano plot: Plasma samples from AML patients vs normal donors. Notes: Log2 Fold Change is shown on the x-axis and–log10 p-value is shown on the y-axis. Points in bold font indicate miRNAs with statistically significant log fold change and adjusted p-value, green color indicated down-regulation and red color indicated up-regulation. Volcano plot: Plasma samples vs BM cell samples from AML patients. Notes: Difference of plasma samples and BM cell samples from AML patients. Log2 Fold Change is shown on the x-axis and–log10 p-value is shown on the y-axis. Points in bold font indicate miRNAs with statistically significant log fold change and adjusted p-value, green color indicated down-regulation and red color indicated up-regulation. We then performed subset analysis of our data on the miRNAs with the ILCreg associated id2, id3, sox4, tgfbr1, tgfbr2, il2rb and il2rg genes. Results showed 14 miRNAs with a statistically significant difference in expression level (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from BM cell samples between AML patients and normal donors (Table 2). Meanwhile, there were 34 miRNAs with a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001). Figure 9 shows greatest increase from BM cell samples when comparing AML patients to controls.
Table 2

Comparison of BM Cell Sample miRNA Expression Levels Between AML Patients and Normal Donors

Gene IDAMLM2_BMC ExpressionND_BMC ExpressionAMLM2_BMC Average Read CountND_BMC Average Read CountLog2 (ND_BMC/AMLM2_BMC)P value(AMLM2_BMC-Vs-ND_BMC)Q value (AMLM2_BMC-Vs-ND_BMC)
hsa-miR-24-3p17,801.22238,942.523,090.77860,7681.1123200
hsa-miR-370-3p817.167817.3330.83181.40E-045.10E-04
hsa-miR-3074-5p5310.22210,925.667590112,285.50.7742500
hsa-miR-342-5p1158.11123911189.6672472.1670.7715400
hsa-miR-3200-3p7.667168160.716320.001330.00412
hsa-miR-128-1-5p1.3332.8331.4442.8330.688310.192140.33203
hsa-miR-315453.778765476.50.218820.019430.04804
hsa-miR-1275916.1111287.333937.5561318.1670.2078800
hsa-miR-1271-5p233.333311.167236.889317.3330.138110.002310.00682
hsa-miR-1307-3p1155.1111505.6671195.6671555.3330.0957301.00E-05
hsa-miR-18a-3p251318.333261.556330.1670.05240.231420.38122
hsa-miR-212-3p50.3336151.33361.833−0.015190.879270.93717
hsa-miR-339-3p487.111583.167499.556593.333−0.035480.270040.4214
hsa-miR-3187-3p77.33389.83378.88991.5−0.069730.391840.55886
hsa-miR-138-5p24.88938.536.22240−0.140550.247970.39494
hsa-miR-432-5p19.88921.3332021.5−0.179340.276580.43017
hsa-miR-149-5p22.66726.525.66727.333−0.192910.185930.32473
hsa-miR-378e4.778555−0.283680.398060.56686
hsa-miR-25-5p159.556149164.889151.833−0.4026800
hsa-miR-324-3p676.333504.833693.778515.333−0.7126500
hsa-miR-324-5p549.556356.667561.667361.167−0.9207300
hsa-miR-127018.2229.83318.66710−1.1841400
hsa-miR-193b-3p630.778248.833651.333251.167−1.6584300
hsa-miR-210-3p111.22234.667113.11135.5−1.9555300
hsa-miR-34c-5p59.33318.333128.88919−3.0457400
Figure 9

Box plots showing greatest increase from AML patient BM cell samples when comparing to controls.

Notes: Box plots showing greatest increase from AML patient BM cell samples when comparing to controls. Y-axis showed average measurement of relative expression level of miRNAs from AML patients and normal donors.

Box plots showing greatest increase or greatest decrease of miRNAs from plasma samples when comparing AML to controls. Notes: Box plots showing greatest increase (upper panel) or greatest decrease (lower panel) of miRNAs from AML patient plasma samples when comparing to controls. Y-axis showed average measurement of relative expression level of miRNAs from AML patients and normal donors. Box plots showing greatest increase from AML patient BM cell samples when comparing to controls. Notes: Box plots showing greatest increase from AML patient BM cell samples when comparing to controls. Y-axis showed average measurement of relative expression level of miRNAs from AML patients and normal donors. Comparison of BM Cell Sample miRNA Expression Levels Between AML Patients and Normal Donors 34 miRNA from plasma samples and 14 from BM cell samples that showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) between AML patients and normal donors are shown in Table 3. The # indicated miRNAs were segments found in both plasma and BM cell samples. miRNAs that have not previously been associated with AML are indicated with asterisks. Figure 8 showed greatest increase and decrease from plasma samples when comparing AML patients to controls.
Table 3

A Total of 34 miRNA from Plasma Samples and 14 from BM Cell Samples That Showed a Statistically Significant Difference

Gene IDLog2 FC(ND_XJ/AMLM2_XJ)ILCregs Related GenesGene IDLog2 (ND_BMC/AMLM2_BMC)ILCregs Related Genes
hsa-miR-1271-5p*9.34877d2hsa-miR-486-3p#1.53652il2rg
hsa-miR-3200-3p8.85439tgfbr1hsa-miR-23a-5p1.44084il2rg
hsa-miR-193b-3p*#8.55935sox4hsa-miR-584-3p1.36018tgfbr1
hsa-miR-432-5p8.36976tgfbr2hsa-miR-24-3p*1.11232tgfbr1
hsa-miR-3154*6.94874id2, sox4hsa-miR-3194-3p1.07301id3
hsa-miR-18a-3p*6.14571id2hsa-miR-3151-5p−1.11375tgfbr2
hsa-miR-1298-5p5.75325id2hsa-miR-1270*#−1.18414sox4
hsa-miR-324-3p4.59904sox4hsa-miR-210-5p*−1.24805sox4
hsa-miR-1270*#3.3365sox4hsa-miR-193b-3p*#−1.65843sox4
hsa-miR-370-3p*2.59359id2, tgfbr2hsa-miR-210-3p*#−1.95553id2
hsa-miR-3074-5p*2.1621tgfbr2hsa-miR-34c-5p*−3.04574tgfbr2
hsa-miR-138-5p*2.0674id2hsa-miR-6722-3p−4.50607tgfbr1
hsa-miR-212-3p*#1.79612sox4hsa-miR-128-2-5p−4.72552sox4
hsa-miR-210-3p*−1.53215id2hsa-miR-5195-3p−5.28368tgfbr1
hsa-miR-1275−1.6481id2, sox4, tgfbr1
hsa-miR-3187-3p*−1.68836tgfbr1
hsa-miR-491-5p*−3.06053il2rg
hsa-miR-342-5p*−3.0985tgfbr2
hsa-miR-486-3p#−3.17156il2rg
hsa-miR-378d*−3.24956sox4
hsa-miR-101-3p*−3.45966tgfbr1
hsa-miR-1268b−4.92447sox4
hsa-miR-4722-5p−4.961id3, tgfbr1
hsa-miR-1268a−5.92447sox4
hsa-miR-3909*−5.961id2
hsa-miR-181a-2-3p*−5.97892sox4
hsa-miR-339-3p*−7.23575sox4
hsa-miR-193b-5p*−7.41166id2
hsa-miR-1908-5p−7.59423id2
hsa-miR-146b-3p*−8.42697id2
hsa-miR-128-1-5p−9.25745sox4
hsa-miR-6751-5p−9.86823id3
hsa-miR-25-5p−9.9698sox4
hsa-miR-4747-5p−13.08938id2

Notes: *miRNAs that have not previously been associated with AML are indicated with asterisks.  #miRNAs that have been found in both plasma and BM cell samples.

Figure 8

Box plots showing greatest increase or greatest decrease of miRNAs from plasma samples when comparing AML to controls.

Notes: Box plots showing greatest increase (upper panel) or greatest decrease (lower panel) of miRNAs from AML patient plasma samples when comparing to controls. Y-axis showed average measurement of relative expression level of miRNAs from AML patients and normal donors.

A Total of 34 miRNA from Plasma Samples and 14 from BM Cell Samples That Showed a Statistically Significant Difference Notes: *miRNAs that have not previously been associated with AML are indicated with asterisks.  #miRNAs that have been found in both plasma and BM cell samples. Furthermore, we identified each individual ILCregs-associated genes miRNAs from both plasma and BM cell samples that showed a statistical significance (Table 4). Among these ILCregs associated genes include id2, id3, sox4, tgfbr1, tgfbr2, il2rb and il2rg which all comprise miRNAs that had been found in either plasma or BM cell samples or in both with the exception of the il2rb gene. For id2 gene, only hsa-miR-210-3p miRNA showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from BM cell samples between AML patients and normal donors. Consequently, we identified 13 miRNAs related to id2 gene that showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from plasma samples between AML patients and normal donors.
Table 4

ILCregs Associated Genes Related miRNA Expression Patterns from Plasma and BM Cell Samples

GenesSamplesGene Associated miRNAs
SOXBM cell sampleshsa-miR-193b-3p; hsa-miR-128-2-5p; hsa-miR-1270; hsa-miR-210-5p
Plasma sampleshsa-miR-324-3p; hsa-miR-1268b; hsa-miR-128-1-5p; hsa-miR-193b-3p; hsa-miR-181a-2-3p; hsa-miR-1275; hsa-miR-3154; hsa-miR-1268a; hsa-miR-1270; hsa-miR-339-3p; hsa-miR-378d; hsa-miR-25-5p; hsa-miR-212-3p
ID2BM cell sampleshsa-miR-210-3p
Plasma sampleshsa-miR-193b-5p; hsa-miR-3909; hsa-miR-138-5p; hsa-miR-4747-5p; hsa-miR-1275; hsa-miR-1298-5p; hsa-miR-1908-5p; hsa-miR-3154; hsa-miR-18a-3p; hsa-miR-1271-5p; hsa-miR-370-3p; hsa-miR-146b-3p; hsa-miR-210-3p
ID3BM cell sampleshsa-miR-3194-3p
Plasma sampleshsa-miR-6751-5p; hsa-miR-4722-5p
IL2RGBM cell sampleshsa-miR-23a-5p; hsa-miR-486-3p
Plasma sampleshsa-miR-491-5p; hsa-miR-486-3p
TGFBR1BM cell sampleshsa-miR-24-3p; hsa-miR-5195-3p; hsa-miR-584-3p; hsa-miR-6722-3p
Plasma sampleshsa-miR-101-3p; hsa-miR-1275; hsa-miR-3200-3p; hsa-miR-3187-3p; hsa-miR-4722-5p
TGFBR2BM cell sampleshsa-miR-3151-5p; hsa-miR-34c-5p
Plasma sampleshsa-miR-432-5p; hsa-miR-342-5p; hsa-miR-370-3p; hsa-miR-3074-5p
ILCregs Associated Genes Related miRNA Expression Patterns from Plasma and BM Cell Samples For id3 gene-related miRNAs, only hsa-miR-3194-3p miRNA that showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from BM cell samples between AML patients and normal donors. Meanwhile, only hsa-miR-6751-5p and hsa-miR-4722-5p showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from plasma samples between AML patients and normal donors. For il2rg gene-related miRNAs, only hsa-miR-23a-5p and hsa-miR-486-3p miRNAs showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from BM cell samples between AML patients and normal donors. Meanwhile, only hsa-miR-491-5p and hsa-miR-486-3p that showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from plasma samples between AML patients and normal donors. For sox4 gene-related miRNAs, four miRNAs hsa-miR-193b-3p, hsa-miR-128-2-5p, hsa-miR-1270, hsa-miR-210-5p miRNAs showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from BM cell samples between AML patients and normal donors. Meanwhile, there were 13 miRNAs that showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from plasma samples between AML patients and normal donors. For tgfrb1 gene related miRNAs, four miRNAs hsa-miR-24-3p, hsa-miR-5195-3p, hsa-miR-584-3p, hsa-miR-6722-3p miRNAs showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from BM cell samples between AML patients and normal donors. Meanwhile, five hsa-miR-101-3p, hsa-miR-1275, hsa-miR-3200-3p, hsa-miR-3187-3p, hsa-miR-4722-5p miRNAs that showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from plasma samples between AML patients and normal donors. For tgfrb2 gene-related miRNAs, hsa-miR-3151-5p and hsa-miR-34c-5p miRNAs showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from BM cell samples between AML patients and normal donors. Meanwhile, hsa-miR-432-5p, hsa-miR-342-5p, hsa-miR-370-3p, hsa-miR-3074-5p miRNAs that showed a statistically significant difference (both Q value and P-value < 0.001) from plasma samples between AML patients and normal donors. No IL2rb-related miRNAs were found in our test.

Discussion

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal neoplastic disease with the proliferation of leukemic myeloid hematopoietic precursor cells and impaired production of normal hematopoiesis.25–27 Research results have confirmed that AML patients have immune system impairment. Regulatory T cells are the most important part of the immune system, which have numerically and functionally deficiencies in AML patients.28–31 These defects are reported to suppress the proliferation and function of T helper cells.32–34 ILC is a kind of innate immune lymphocyte discovered in recent years.35 ILCregs cells, one of its subpopulation, had been discovered in both human and mouse intestines.12,13 The newly discovered ILCregs share the characteristics of innate immune cells and Tregs while playing an important role in the pathogenesis of intestinal inflammatory diseases and other related immune regulation. The function and mechanism of ILCregs in AML are still unclear. Studies have shown that ILCreg cell populations continuously express Tgfbr1, Tgfbr2, Il2rb, and Il2rg, suggesting that ILCregs could respond to TGF-beta and IL-2 signals. IL-10 and TGF-beta 1 are also highly expressed in human ILCregs. 12,13 Although ILCregs had been studied in the intestines of mice and humans, the frequency and expression patterns in patients with AML had not been explored yet. By using the combination of surface markers of CD45, Lin, CD127, and IL-10 for intracellular staining followed by flow cytometry analysis, we were able to detect ILCregs in BM from both normal donors and patients with AML. The frequency of the CD45+Lin−CD127+IL-10+ ILCregs subset populations was significantly decreased in the patients with AML comparing to normal donors. Our results have shown for the first time the enumeration and deficiency of ILCregs in patients with AML. CD127 had been used by many researchers as the major specific surface marker to distinguish Tregs from normal T cells. Research results have shown that CD25+CD127hi T cells play a role in maintaining non-inflammatory environment by deviating immune responses away from pro-inflammatory Th1 response and encourage an anti-inflammatory Th2-type response.28 A variety of studies have also shown the deficiencies of the regulatory T cells in AML patients.32,34,36,37 CD45+Lin−CD127+IL-10− cell population had not been explored in patients with AML and its function remains unknown. Our results show that in comparison with the normal donors, the frequency of CD45+Lin−CD127+IL-10− cells in AML patients was significantly decreased for BM cells population (P<0.01). ILCreg cell populations have continuously expressed Tgfbr1, Tgfbr2, Il2rb, and Il2rg,12,13 but the miRNAs related to these genes have not yet been explored. We chose to sequence all miRNAs that were obtained in both plasma and BM cell samples from patients with newly diagnosed AML and controls. We quantified expression of 3280 miRNAs from each patient and control and performed statistical analyses to determine which miRNAs were increased or decreased in AML patients. Interestingly, our results demonstrate that several ILCreg miRNAs have been found from both plasma and BM cell samples with either up-regulated or down-regulated variants. This suggested that these miRNAs may play an important role in the development and function of ILCregs. Future studies in ILCreg regulation may give additional information about the role of ILCregs in the pathogenesis of AML. Some of the studies have demonstrated that certain miRNAs play an important role in certain malignant diseases such as AML with NPM1+/FLT3+ mutations.38 One of the miRNAs associated with NPM1+/FLT3+ AML, miR-10a-5p showed the most statistically significant adjusted p-value in the yield as well as the highest fold change. This miRNA had been described in patients with NPM1 mutations. It’s noted that high expression levels are associated with good response to induction chemotherapy.39 More recent studies demonstrate a role for miR-10a/b in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of HL-60 leukemic cells in vitro.40 Other literature demonstrate that high expression of miR-338 is associated with poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia undergoing chemotherapy.41 However, our results show that certain ILCreg genes targeted miRNAs had been found in both plasma and BM cells samples either up-regulated or down-regulated. These miRNAs may play an important role in the ILCregs’s immuno-modulation. MiR-181 family has been shown by others to be consistently increased in AML patients.42–44 There are numerous possible target mRNAs for the miR-181 family leading to its interest as a therapeutic target. However, our results did not show the significant difference between AML patients and normal donors from both plasma and BM cell samples. In addition, there are no reported associations between miRNA-181 family and ILCreg associated genes. Another report has shown that miR-199b is consistently decreased in AML,45 but our results did not show the expression difference between AML patients and normal donors. There was another report of increased expression of miR-223-3p in AML patients;46 however, our results did not show significant difference between AML patients and normal donors from both plasma and BM cell samples. Subset analysis of our data on the miRNAs with the ILCregs associated id2, id3, sox4, tgfbr1, tgfbr2, il2rb and il2rg genes showed that there were 34 miRNA from plasma samples and 14 miRNAs from BM cells samples with expression levels that showed a statistically significant difference between AML patients and normal donors. The first identification of each individual ILCreg miRNA segments with a significant difference from AML patients will be helpful for further research on the ILCregs in AML molecular pathogenesis. However, our data are only a beginning to further studies for large sampling and observation in similar AML patients but at different time points, such as at diagnosis, after complete remission, etc.

Conclusion

Our study enumerates ILCregs, then measures miRNAs from those ILCregs in AML samples. The ILCregs and miRNA deficiencies are detected in patients with AML. Our results demonstrate the deficiency of ILCreg and differential expression of miRNAs in patients with AML.
  46 in total

Review 1.  Innate lymphoid cells: emerging insights in development, lineage relationships, and function.

Authors:  Hergen Spits; Tom Cupedo
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 28.527

Review 2.  MiRNA Biogenesis and Regulation of Diseases: An Overview.

Authors:  Anchal Vishnoi; Sweta Rani
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

3.  Human IL-25- and IL-33-responsive type 2 innate lymphoid cells are defined by expression of CRTH2 and CD161.

Authors:  Jenny M Mjösberg; Sara Trifari; Natasha K Crellin; Charlotte P Peters; Cornelis M van Drunen; Berber Piet; Wytske J Fokkens; Tom Cupedo; Hergen Spits
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Version 3.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Margaret R O'Donnell; Martin S Tallman; Camille N Abboud; Jessica K Altman; Frederick R Appelbaum; Daniel A Arber; Vijaya Bhatt; Dale Bixby; William Blum; Steven E Coutre; Marcos De Lima; Amir T Fathi; Melanie Fiorella; James M Foran; Steven D Gore; Aric C Hall; Patricia Kropf; Jeffrey Lancet; Lori J Maness; Guido Marcucci; Michael G Martin; Joseph O Moore; Rebecca Olin; Deniz Peker; Daniel A Pollyea; Keith Pratz; Farhad Ravandi; Paul J Shami; Richard M Stone; Stephen A Strickland; Eunice S Wang; Matthew Wieduwilt; Kristina Gregory; Ndiya Ogba
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 5.  MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  Rajesha Rupaimoole; Frank J Slack
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  Clonal Hematopoiesis and Evolution to Hematopoietic Malignancies.

Authors:  Robert L Bowman; Lambert Busque; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 7.  Human innate lymphoid cells.

Authors:  Elisa Montaldo; Paola Vacca; Chiara Vitale; Francesca Moretta; Franco Locatelli; Maria Cristina Mingari; Lorenzo Moretta
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.685

8.  Transcriptional programs define molecular characteristics of innate lymphoid cell classes and subsets.

Authors:  Michelle L Robinette; Anja Fuchs; Victor S Cortez; Jacob S Lee; Yaming Wang; Scott K Durum; Susan Gilfillan; Marco Colonna
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 25.606

9.  Increased Regulatory T Cells in Peripheral Blood of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Rely on Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α-TNF Receptor-2 Pathway.

Authors:  Min Wang; Chen Zhang; Tian Tian; Teng Zhang; Ruiqing Wang; Fengjiao Han; Chaoqin Zhong; Mingqiang Hua; Daoxin Ma
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  The distribution of T-cell subsets and the expression of immune checkpoint receptors and ligands in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Patrick Williams; Sreyashi Basu; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Christopher S Hourigan; Karolyn A Oetjen; Jorge E Cortes; Farhad Ravandi; Elias J Jabbour; Zainab Al-Hamal; Marina Konopleva; Jing Ning; Lianchun Xiao; Juliana Hidalgo Lopez; Steve M Kornblau; Michael Andreeff; Wilmer Flores; Carlos Bueso-Ramos; Jorge Blando; Pallavi Galera; Katherine R Calvo; Gheath Al-Atrash; James P Allison; Hagop M Kantarjian; Padmanee Sharma; Naval G Daver
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Harnessing Unconventional T Cells and Innate Lymphoid Cells to Prevent and Treat Hematological Malignancies: Prospects for New Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Alessandro Allegra; Marco Casciaro; Elena Lo Presti; Caterina Musolino; Sebastiano Gangemi
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  miR-155-5p regulates macrophage M1 polarization and apoptosis in the synovial fluid of patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Gui-Shi Li; Lei Cui; Guang-Da Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Myosin 1g and 1f: A Prospective Analysis in NK Cell Functions.

Authors:  David Cruz-Zárate; Carlos Emilio Miguel-Rodríguez; Irving Ulises Martínez-Vargas; Leopoldo Santos-Argumedo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 7.561

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.