Syed Faisal Afaque1, Ajai Singh1, Rajiv Maharjan2, Rahul Ranjan3, Anil Kumar Panda1, Amitosh Mishra1. 1. Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Supracondylar fracture of humerus (SFH) is frequently encountered in the immature skeleton, [1] predominantly in the non-dominant extremity. AIM: This study compared the clinic-radiological outcome between cross pinning with lateral pinning for fixation of displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All eligible patients were randomized into two groups, group I for lateral pinning and group II for cross pinning. Before passing medial pin in group II a stab incision was given to visualise the medial epicondyle. Patients were followed up on 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months. Final outcome was measured in terms of clinic-radiological union, Baumann angle, loss of reduction, stability of fracture fixation, incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury and Flynn's score. Results: There were 37 patients in group I and 40 in group II. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic details. At the final outcome there were no difference in between the groups in terms of all radiological and clinical outcome. Two patients of group I developed delay ulnar neuritis, which resolve completely in subsequent follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both techniques provide stable fixation, union and good functional outcome without iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury provided that small incision sufficient enough to identify the medial epicondyle is given with passing of medial pin.
INTRODUCTION: Supracondylar fracture of humerus (SFH) is frequently encountered in the immature skeleton, [1] predominantly in the non-dominant extremity. AIM: This study compared the clinic-radiological outcome between cross pinning with lateral pinning for fixation of displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All eligible patients were randomized into two groups, group I for lateral pinning and group II for cross pinning. Before passing medial pin in group II a stab incision was given to visualise the medial epicondyle. Patients were followed up on 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months. Final outcome was measured in terms of clinic-radiological union, Baumann angle, loss of reduction, stability of fracture fixation, incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury and Flynn's score. Results: There were 37 patients in group I and 40 in group II. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic details. At the final outcome there were no difference in between the groups in terms of all radiological and clinical outcome. Two patients of group I developed delay ulnar neuritis, which resolve completely in subsequent follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both techniques provide stable fixation, union and good functional outcome without iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury provided that small incision sufficient enough to identify the medial epicondyle is given with passing of medial pin.
Authors: Irena Krusche-Mandl; Silke Aldrian; Julia Köttstorfer; Astrid Seis; Gerhild Thalhammer; Alexander Egkher Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2012-06-23 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Joseph M Queally; Natasha Paramanathan; James C Walsh; Cathal J Moran; Fintan J Shannon; Lester G D'Souza Journal: Injury Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Ben A Marson; Adeel Ikram; Simon Craxford; Sharon R Lewis; Kathryn R Price; Benjamin J Ollivere Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-06-09