Yan Ning Neo1, Claire Gilmour2, Caroline J MacEwen3, Una O'Colmain4. 1. Moorfields Eye Hospital, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 162 City Road, EC1V 2PD, London, UK. 2. Department of Orthoptics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK. uocolmain@nhs.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study reports the long-term visual and treatment outcomes in a whole-population, orthoptic-delivered pre-school visual screening (PSVS) programme in Scotland and further examines their associations with socioeconomic backgrounds and home circumstances. METHODS: Retrospective case review was conducted on 430 children who failed PSVS. Outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), severity of amblyopia (mild, moderate and severe), binocular vision (BV) (normal, poor and none), ophthalmic diagnosis and treatment modalities. Parameters at discharge were compared to those at baseline and were measured against the Scottish index of multiple deprivation (SIMD) and Health plan indicator (HPI), which are indices of deprivation and status of home circumstances. RESULTS: The proportion of children with amblyopia reduced from 92.3% (373/404) at baseline to 29.1% (106/364) at discharge (p < 0.001). Eighty percent (291/364) had good BV at discharge compared to 29.2% (118/404) at baseline (p < 0.001). Children from more socioeconomically deprived areas (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.01-4.30, p = 0.003) or adverse family backgrounds (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.99-7.74, p = 0.002) were more likely to attend poorly and/or become lost to follow-up. Children from worse home circumstances were five times more likely to have residual amblyopia (OR 5.37, 95% CI 3.29-10.07, p < 0.001) and three times more likely to have poor/no BV (OR 3.41, 95% CI 2.49-4.66, p < 0.001) than those from better home circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: Orthoptic-delivered PSVS is successful at screening and managing amblyopia. Children from homes requiring social care input are less likely to attend and are more likely to have poorer visual outcomes.
BACKGROUND: This study reports the long-term visual and treatment outcomes in a whole-population, orthoptic-delivered pre-school visual screening (PSVS) programme in Scotland and further examines their associations with socioeconomic backgrounds and home circumstances. METHODS: Retrospective case review was conducted on 430 children who failed PSVS. Outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), severity of amblyopia (mild, moderate and severe), binocular vision (BV) (normal, poor and none), ophthalmic diagnosis and treatment modalities. Parameters at discharge were compared to those at baseline and were measured against the Scottish index of multiple deprivation (SIMD) and Health plan indicator (HPI), which are indices of deprivation and status of home circumstances. RESULTS: The proportion of children with amblyopia reduced from 92.3% (373/404) at baseline to 29.1% (106/364) at discharge (p < 0.001). Eighty percent (291/364) had good BV at discharge compared to 29.2% (118/404) at baseline (p < 0.001). Children from more socioeconomically deprived areas (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.01-4.30, p = 0.003) or adverse family backgrounds (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.99-7.74, p = 0.002) were more likely to attend poorly and/or become lost to follow-up. Children from worse home circumstances were five times more likely to have residual amblyopia (OR 5.37, 95% CI 3.29-10.07, p < 0.001) and three times more likely to have poor/no BV (OR 3.41, 95% CI 2.49-4.66, p < 0.001) than those from better home circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: Orthoptic-delivered PSVS is successful at screening and managing amblyopia. Children from homes requiring social care input are less likely to attend and are more likely to have poorer visual outcomes.
Authors: George Moussa; Dimitrios Kalogeropoulos; Soon Wai Ch'ng; Kim Son Lett; Arijit Mitra; Ajai K Tyagi; Ash Sharma; Walter Andreatta Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 3.240