| Literature DB >> 32099003 |
Siyu Zhao1, Shuang Xue2, Jinming Zhang1, Zhaohong Zhang1, Jijun Sun1.
Abstract
Toxicity and transformation process ofEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32099003 PMCID: PMC7042342 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60326-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Photolysis Kinetic Fitting Curves of Anthracene and Pyrene.
Figure 2Fitting curve of PHAs photolysis kinetics before and after DOM addition.
Actual and theoretical values of four kinds of DOM light shielding and quenching effect.
| Solution Category | KDOM(h−1)a | Sλ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMRN | 0.007 | 0.9925 | 0.9637 | 0.0363 |
| SRFA | 0.013 | 0.9951 | 0.9268 | 0.0732 |
| ESHA | 0.022 | 0.9695 | 0.8745 | 0.1255 |
| LHA | 0.034 | 0.9766 | 0.8079 | 0.1921 |
| UMRN | 0.014 | 0.9890 | 0.8687 | 0.1313 |
| SRFA | 0.007 | 0.9917 | 0.9317 | 0.0683 |
| ESHA | 0.011 | 0.9662 | 0.8940 | 0.1060 |
| LHA | 0.011 | 0.9733 | 0.8989 | 0.1011 |
aRepresents the observed rate constant of anthracene and pyrene photodegradation in the presence of DOM.
Figure 3Stem-Volmer plots of ESHA, SRFA, UMRN and LHA.
Correlation analysis parameters between the binding capacity of DOM to anthracene and pyrene and quenching effect.
| Analysis object | P | Pearson correlation |
|---|---|---|
| KDOC and | 0.0816 | −0.099 |
| 0.0592 | 0.225 | |
| KDOC and k | 0.0165 | −0.543 |
Figure 4(a) Photolysis Ultraviolet Spectra of Anthracene and Pyrene. (b) Photolysis ultraviolet of DOM. (c) Photolysis ultraviolet spectra of mixtures of DOM and Anthracene. (d) Photolysis Ultraviolet Spectra of DOM and Pyrene.
Figure 5Infrared Spectra of DOM and Anthracene and Pyrene.