| Literature DB >> 32098907 |
Thomas Ploug1, Søren Holm2,3.
Abstract
In this response to Neil Manson's latest intervention in our debate about the best consent model for biobank research we show, contra Manson that the 'expiry problem' that affects broad consent models because of changes over time in methods, purposes, types of data used and governance structures is a real and significant problem. We further show that our preferred implementation of meta consent as a national consent platform solves this problem and is not subject to the cost and burden objections that Manson raises. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Keywords: genetic information; informed consent; research ethics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32098907 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903