| Literature DB >> 32098553 |
Hikmettullah Batgi1, Alparslan Merdin1, Mehmet Sinan Dal1, Merih Kızıl Çakar1, Jale Yıldız1, Semih Başçı1, Bahar Uncu Ulu1, Tuğçe Nur Yiğenoğlu1, Tahir Darçın1, Derya Şahin1, Mehmet Bakırtaş1, Ayşegül Tetik1, Dicle İskender1, Fevzi Altuntaş1.
Abstract
The optimal choice of salvage therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Hodgkin lymphoma remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to share our experience in relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients who received GDP/R-GDP as salvage chemotherapy in our center. Data of 47 relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who received GDP or R-GDP as salvage chemotherapy in our center between July 2014 and October 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma patients were divided into two groups as primary refractory and relapsed. The one-year overall survival was 100% (for relapsed) and 36.9% (for refractory) in the non-Hodgkin lymphoma groups, and 82.5% (for relapsed) and 80% (for refractory) in the Hodgkin lymphoma group. The one-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 72.7% (for relapsed) and 38.5% (for refractory) in patients with NHL, and 41% (for relapsed) and 18.2% (for refractory) in patients with HL. GDP/R-GDP seems to be a well-tolerated out-patient salvage regimen for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. Although proven efficacy, negative toxicity profile, and ease of administration, the application of gemcitabine-based therapy for patients with primary refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma provided limited success.Entities:
Keywords: GDP; relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma; relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32098553 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220905654
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oncol Pharm Pract ISSN: 1078-1552 Impact factor: 1.809