| Literature DB >> 32098179 |
Bao-Linh Tran1, Wei-Chun Tseng1, Chi-Chung Chen1, Shu-Yi Liao1.
Abstract
Climate change is regarded as one of the major factors enhancing the transmission intensity of dengue fever. In this study, we estimated the threshold effects of temperature on Aedes mosquito larval index as an early warning tool for dengue prevention. We also investigated the relationship between dengue vector index and dengue epidemics in Taiwan using weekly panel data for 17 counties from January 2012 to May 2019. To achieve our goals, we first applied the panel threshold regression technique to test for threshold effects and determine critical temperature values. Data were then further decomposed into different sets corresponding to different temperature regimes. Finally, negative binomial regression models were applied to assess the non-linear relationship between meteorological factors and Breteau index (BI). At the national level, we found that a 1°C temperature increase caused the expected value of BI to increase by 0.09 units when the temperature is less than 27.21 °C, and by 0.26 units when the temperature is greater than 27.21 °C. At the regional level, the dengue vector index was more sensitive to temperature changes because double threshold effects were found in the southern Taiwan model. For southern Taiwan, as the temperature increased by 1°C, the expected value of BI increased by 0.29, 0.63, and 1.49 units when the average temperature was less than 27.27 °C, between 27.27 and 30.17 °C, and higher than 30.17 °C, respectively. In addition, the effects of precipitation and relative humidity on BI became stronger when the average temperature exceeded the thresholds. Regarding the impacts of climate change on BI, our results showed that the potential effects on BI range from 3.5 to 54.42% under alternative temperature scenarios. By combining threshold regression techniques with count data regression models, this study provides evidence of threshold effects between climate factors and the dengue vector index. The proposed threshold of temperature could be incorporated into the implementation of public health measures and risk prediction to prevent and control dengue fever in the future.Entities:
Keywords: climate; dengue; negative binomial regression model; threshold effect; vector index
Year: 2020 PMID: 32098179 PMCID: PMC7068348 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Descriptive statistics of variables used in analyses
| Region | Dengue Fever (Cases) | BI |
| Humidity (%) | Precipitation (mm) | Population Density (per km2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nationwide | Mean | 9.65 | 1.51 | 23.457 | 77.06 | 5.59 | 1225.36 |
| St. Dev | 118.81 | 1.93 | 4.77 | 6.78 | 10.47 | 2233.55 | |
| Max | 3416 | 30.44 | 32.56 | 98.86 | 123.14 | 9956.10 | |
| Min | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46.86 | 0 | 61.79 | |
| Southern | Mean | 52.55 | 3.48 | 25.44 | 74.25 | 5.56 | 719.15 |
| St. Dev | 278.95 | 3.16 | 3.77 | 5.73 | 12.99 | 299.13 | |
| Max | 3416 | 30.44 | 31.33 | 94.43 | 105.86 | 995.42 | |
| Min | 0 | 0 | 13.21 | 55.86 | 0 | 296.20 |
Note: St. Dev denotes standard deviation, Max denotes maximum value, Min denotes minimum value.
Tests for threshold effects.
| Nationwide | Southern | |
|---|---|---|
| Test for single threshold | ||
|
| 108.48 | 28.56 |
| 0.060 | 0.000 | |
| Critical values (10 | 92.34, 120.63, 153.91 | 15.83, 15.93, 17.37 |
| Test for double threshold | ||
|
| 17.58 | 9.31 |
| 0.52 | 0.000 | |
| Critical values (10 | 34.83, 41.12, 54.98 | 7.40, 7.74, 8.04 |
| Test for triple threshold | ||
|
| 18.76 | 7.21 |
| 0.45 | 0.92 | |
| Critical values (10 | 35.65, 43.37, 64.02 | 12.62, 12.74, 14.03 |
Temperature threshold estimates.
| Region | Threshold Effect | Estimates | 95% Confidence Intervals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nationwide | Single threshold | [27.09, 27.24] | |
| Southern | Double threshold | [26.92, 27.29] | |
| [29.74, 30.19] |
Figure 1Confidence interval construction for (a) Nationwide (single) and (b) Southern region (double) thresholds. Note: The dash lines denote the critical value (7.35) at the 95% confidence level.
Likelihood ratio test results.
| Assumption: Poisson Nested in NB | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Panel Poisson | LR-chi2(1) = 37.22 | 6545 | −8680.7 | 5 | 17,352.55 | 17,389.49 |
| Panel NB | 6545 | −8652.2 | 6 | 17,316.33 | 17,357.05 | |
|
| ||||||
| Panel Poisson | LR-chi2(1) = 116.88 | 1155 | −2489.1 | 5 | 4986.18 | 5006.39 |
| Panel NB | 1155 | −2357.9 | 6 | 4727.49 | 4758.29 | |
Estimation results of the effects of weather factors on Breteau index.
| Region | Temperature Range | Variable | Coefficient | Marginal Effect | Std. Err | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nationwide | Temp | Temp. | 0.069*** | 0.087 | 0.004 | [0.060, 0.075] |
| Precip. | 0.006*** | 0.007 | 0.001 | [0.003, 0.008] | ||
| Humid. | −0.009*** | −0.011 | 0.004 | [−0.014, 0.005] | ||
| Constant | −0.642*** | 0.202 | [−1.041, −0.243] | |||
| Temp | Temp. | 0.087*** | 0.261 | 0.017 | [0.073, 0.143] | |
| Precip. | 0.008*** | 0.023 | 0.001 | [0.006, 0.010] | ||
| Humid. | 0.042*** | 0.122 | 0.003 | [0.035, 0.047] | ||
| Constant | −4.762*** | 1.023 | [−6.783, −2.751] | |||
| Southern | Temp | Temp. | 0.098*** | 0.288 | 0.011 | [0.078, 0.119] |
| Precip. | 0.011*** | 0.032 | 0.002 | [0.005, 0.016] | ||
| Humid. | −0.005 | −0.147 | 0.005 | [−0.016, 0.006] | ||
| Constant | −1.191*** | 0.455 | [−2.085, 0.296] | |||
| 27.27 | Temp. | 0.112*** | 0.625 | 0.006 | [0.096, 0.122] | |
| Precip | 0.006*** | 0.035 | 0.001 | [0.002, 0.008] | ||
| Humid. | 0.024*** | 0.134 | 0.004 | [0.014, 0.032] | ||
| Constant | −3.431*** | 0.326 | [−4.073, −2.789] | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Temp | Temp. | 0.453** | 1.487 | 0.208 | [0.005, 0.801] | |
| Precip. | −0.004 | −0.013 | 0.014 | [−0.032, 0.024] | ||
| Humid. | 0.068*** | 0.225 | 0.019 | [0.030, 0.106] | ||
| Constant | −17.565** | 7.506 | [−32.297, −2.874] |
Note: Std. Err. denotes standard errors and *, **, and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.
Likelihood ratio test results.
| Assumption: Poisson Nested in NB | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Test Statistic | Observation | LL (model) | df | AIC | BIC |
|
| ||||||
| Panel Poisson | LR-chi2(1) = 306,944 | 6511 | −160,726.3 | 4 | 321,460.7 | 321,487.8 |
| Panel NB | 6511 | −7253.8 | 5 | 14,517.7 | 14,551.6 | |
|
| ||||||
| Panel Poisson | LR-chi2(1) = 308,356 | 1149 | −160,726.3 | 4 | 132,471.2 | 132,723.4 |
| Panel NB | Prob > chi2 = 0.000 | 1149 | −2986.2 | 5 | 5982.3 | 6007.5 |
Estimation results for the effects of Breteau index and population density on dengue cases.
| Variable | Coefficient | Std. Err. | Marginal Effect | IRR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nationwide | |||||
| BI | 0.028*** | 0.008 | 0.013 | 1.028*** | [1.008, 1.047] |
| Pop._Den. | 0.001** | 0.000 | 0.0005 | 1.000*** | [0.999, 1.001] |
| Constant | −2.015*** | 0.049 | |||
| Southern | |||||
| BI | 0.075*** | 0.009 | 0.016 | 1.077*** | [1.056, 1.097] |
| Pop._Den. | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.0002 | 1.001*** | [0.998, 1.002] |
| Constant | −2.515*** | 0.174 |
Note: Std. Err. denotes standard errors and *, **, and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.
Percentage change in Breteau index under climate change projections.
| Scenarios | Year | Nationwide | Southern | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCP 2.6 | RCP 4.5 | RCP 6.0 | RCP 8.5 | RCP 2.6 | RCP 4.5 | RCP 6.0 | RCP 8.5 | ||
| Temperature Change Projection | 2021–2040 | 0.63 (2.69%) | 0.67 (2.86%) | 0.61 (2.60%) | 0.77 (3.28%) | 0.62 (2.44%) | 0.66 (2.59%) | 0.66 (2.59%) | 0.76 (2.99%) |
| 2041–2060 | 0.92 (3.92%) | 1.14 (4.86%) | 0.93 (3.96%) | 1.48 (6.31%) | 0.90 (3.54%) | 1.13 (4.44%) | 0.92 (3.62%) | 1.46 (5.74%) | |
| 2061–2080 | 0.87 (3.71%) | 1.43 (6.10%) | 1.42 (6.05%) | 2.30 (9.81%) | 0.86 (3.38%) | 1.41 (5.54%) | 1.40 (5.50%) | 2.27 (8.92%) | |
| 2081–2100 | 0.77 (3.28%) | 1.54 (6.57%) | 1.94 (8.27%) | 3.08 (13.1%) | 0.76 (2.99%) | 1.52 (5.98%) | 1.91 (7.51%) | 3.03 (11.9%) | |
| Change in Expected Value of BI | 2021–2040 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
| 2041–2060 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.42 | |
| 2061–2080 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 1.42 | |
| 2081–2100 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 1.19 | 1.89 | |
| Percentage Change in BI | 2021–2040 | 3.63 | 3.86 | 3.51 | 4.44 | 5.13 | 5.46 | 5.13 | 6.29 |
| 2041–2060 | 5.30 | 6.57 | 5.36 | 8.53 | 7.45 | 9.35 | 7.61 | 12.08 | |
| 2061–2080 | 5.01 | 8.24 | 8.18 | 13.25 | 7.12 | 11.67 | 11.59 | 40.77 | |
| 2081–2100 | 4.44 | 8.87 | 11.18 | 17.75 | 6.29 | 12.58 | 34.30 | 54.42 | |
Panel unit root test results, using Levin–Lin–Chu test, Im–Pesaran–Shin test and Fisher-PP test at I(0).
| Variables | LLC Test | IPS Test | PP-Fisher Chi-Sq. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breteau Index (BI) | −47.58*** | −54.06*** | 131.73*** |
| Dengue Cases (DF) | −28.81*** | −48.65*** | 118.41*** |
| Average Temperature (Temp) | −2.49** | −13.27*** | 27.93*** |
| Precipitation (Precp) | −72.06*** | −66.60*** | 144.49*** |
| Relative Humidity (Humid) | −48.37*** | −47.13*** | 140.77*** |
Note: table displays the results of panel unit root tests where ** and ***, respectively, denote significance at the 5% and 1% levels.