| Literature DB >> 32098084 |
Ruslan Z Valiev1,2, Egor A Prokofiev2, Nikita A Kazarinov2, Georgy I Raab1, Timur B Minasov3, Josef Stráský4.
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed much progress in medical device manufacturing and the needs of the medicEntities:
Keywords: enhanced strength and fatigue life; functionality; medical implants with improved design; nanostructured Ti alloys; severe plastic deformation; shape-memory NiTi alloy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32098084 PMCID: PMC7078807 DOI: 10.3390/ma13040967
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Influence of ECAP-C strain on (a) grain boundary (GB) density, (b) yield strength and (c) the contribution of various strengthening mechanisms [21].
Mechanical properties of coarse-grained (CG) and nanostructured CP Grade 4 Ti. Annealed Ti-6Al-4V ELI (extra low interstitials) alloy for comparison.
| State | Processing | UTS, MPa | YS, MPa | Elongation, % | Reduction Area, % | Fatigue Strength at 106 Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Initial CG Ti | 700 | 530 | 25 | 52 | 340 |
| 2 | nanoTi | 1240 | 1200 | 12 | 42 | 620 |
| 3 | Annealed | 940 | 840 | 16 | 45 | 530 |
Figure 2Engineering stress−strain tensile curves of the Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy: coarse-grained material (initial) (1); UFG condition (2) and UFG condition after annealing at 500 °C (3).
Figure 3Fatigue test results of initial coarse-grained material and UFG material after annealing at 500 °C, 1 h.
Figure 4Microstructure of (a) Ti15Mo alloy prepared by HPT and (b) Ti-35Nb-6Ta-7ZZr alloy prepared by ECAP (cross-section).
Figure 5Microstructure of (a) NC and (b) UFG NiTi alloys processed by HPT and ECAP, respectively.
Figure 6Mechanical properties of NiTi alloy in CG condition and after ECAP. (a) Engineering stress–strain curves for tensile tests in CG state (1) and after ECAP using 4 (2), 8 (3) and 12 (4) passes and (b) functional properties (εrmax and σrmax) as a function of number of ECAP passes [61].
Figure 7Geometry of the dental nanoimplant: (a) technical drawing with dimensions in mm; (b) 3D model; (c) enlarged FEM mesh.
Figure 8Maximal principal stress for the UFG Ti implant with a 10% reduced diameter and 67.75 N force.
Figure 9The image of the hip after the insertion of reinforcing implants.
Figure 10Two types of the implant systems used: ((a) a pin; (b) a spiral) and their application using the INSTRON 5982 dynamometer.
Figure 11Testing procedure of the reinforced hip sample.
Service characteristics of the clipping device produced from the NITi alloys.
| Material | Opening Angle of the Jaws, ° | Opening of the Jaws at Reversible Shape Memory Effect, mm | Max Rated Force of the Clipping Device, H |
|---|---|---|---|
| CG | <110 | 2 | 0.44 |
| UFG | 160 | 4 | 0.9 |