Literature DB >> 32097569

Airway Occlusion Pressure As an Estimate of Respiratory Drive and Inspiratory Effort during Assisted Ventilation.

Irene Telias1,2,3, Detajin Junhasavasdikul1,2,4, Nuttapol Rittayamai1,2,5, Lise Piquilloud6, Lu Chen1,2, Niall D Ferguson1,7,3,8, Ewan C Goligher1,3,8, Laurent Brochard1,2.   

Abstract

Rationale: Monitoring and controlling respiratory drive and effort may help to minimize lung and diaphragm injury. Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) is a noninvasive measure of respiratory drive.
Objectives: To determine 1) the validity of "ventilator" P0.1 (P0.1vent) displayed on the screen as a measure of drive, 2) the ability of P0.1 to detect potentially injurious levels of effort, and 3) how P0.1vent displayed by different ventilators compares to a "reference" P0.1 (P0.1ref) measured from airway pressure recording during an occlusion.
Methods: Analysis of three studies in patients, one in healthy subjects, under assisted ventilation, and a bench study with six ventilators. P0.1vent was validated against measures of drive (electrical activity of the diaphragm and muscular pressure over time) and P0.1ref. Performance of P0.1ref and P0.1vent to detect predefined potentially injurious effort was tested using derivation and validation datasets using esophageal pressure-time product as the reference standard.Measurements and Main
Results: P0.1vent correlated well with measures of drive and with the esophageal pressure-time product (within-subjects R2 = 0.8). P0.1ref >3.5 cm H2O was 80% sensitive and 77% specific for detecting high effort (≥200 cm H2O ⋅ s ⋅ min-1); P0.1ref ≤1.0 cm H2O was 100% sensitive and 92% specific for low effort (≤50 cm H2O ⋅ s ⋅ min-1). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for P0.1vent to detect potentially high and low effort were 0.81 and 0.92, respectively. Bench experiments showed a low mean bias for P0.1vent compared with P0.1ref for most ventilators but precision varied; in patients, precision was lower. Ventilators estimating P0.1vent without occlusions could underestimate P0.1ref.Conclusions: P0.1 is a reliable bedside tool to assess respiratory drive and detect potentially injurious inspiratory effort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P0.1; airway occlusion pressure; artificial respiration; diaphragm; myotrauma

Year:  2020        PMID: 32097569     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201907-1425OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  22 in total

1.  ARDS in COVID-19 and beyond: Let's keep our eyes on the goal instead of the straw man.

Authors:  Jarrod Mosier; Bhupinder Natt; Josh Malo
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2020-11-19

Review 2.  Update in Critical Care 2020.

Authors:  Robinder G Khemani; Jessica T Lee; David Wu; Edward J Schenck; Margaret M Hayes; Patricia A Kritek; Gökhan M Mutlu; Hayley B Gershengorn; Rémi Coudroy
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  [Treatment recommendations for mechanical ventilation of COVID‑19 patients].

Authors:  B Neetz; F J F Herth; M M Müller
Journal:  Gefasschirurgie       Date:  2020-09-18

4.  The Respiratory Drive: An Overlooked Tile of COVID-19 Pathophysiology.

Authors:  Luciano Gattinoni; John J Marini; Luigi Camporota
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Non-invasive method to detect high respiratory effort and transpulmonary driving pressures in COVID-19 patients during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Lisanne Roesthuis; Maarten van den Berg; Hans van der Hoeven
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.925

6.  Effect of spontaneous breathing on ventilator-free days in critically ill patients-an analysis of patients in a large observational cohort.

Authors:  Aline Mela Dos Reis; Thais Dias Midega; Rodrigo Octavio Deliberato; Alistair Ew Johnson; Lucas Bulgarelli; Thiago Domingos Correa; Leo Anthony Celi; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama De Abreu; Marcus J Schultz; Ary Serpa Neto
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

7.  Lung- and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation.

Authors:  Ewan C Goligher; Martin Dres; Bhakti K Patel; Sarina K Sahetya; Jeremy R Beitler; Irene Telias; Takeshi Yoshida; Katerina Vaporidi; Domenico Luca Grieco; Tom Schepens; Giacomo Grasselli; Savino Spadaro; Jose Dianti; Marcelo Amato; Giacomo Bellani; Alexandre Demoule; Eddy Fan; Niall D Ferguson; Dimitrios Georgopoulos; Claude Guérin; Robinder G Khemani; Franco Laghi; Alain Mercat; Francesco Mojoli; Coen A C Ottenheijm; Samir Jaber; Leo Heunks; Jordi Mancebo; Tommaso Mauri; Antonio Pesenti; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 30.528

8.  Airway Occlusion Pressure Revisited.

Authors:  Catherine S Sassoon; Magdy Younes
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  High Respiratory Drive and Excessive Respiratory Efforts Predict Relapse of Respiratory Failure in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Pierre Esnault; Michael Cardinale; Sami Hraiech; Philippe Goutorbe; Karine Baumstrack; Eloi Prud'homme; Julien Bordes; Jean-Marie Forel; Eric Meaudre; Laurent Papazian; Christophe Guervilly
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 10.  Clinical strategies for implementing lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation: avoiding insufficient and excessive effort.

Authors:  Ewan C Goligher; Annemijn H Jonkman; Jose Dianti; Katerina Vaporidi; Jeremy R Beitler; Bhakti K Patel; Takeshi Yoshida; Samir Jaber; Martin Dres; Tommaso Mauri; Giacomo Bellani; Alexandre Demoule; Laurent Brochard; Leo Heunks
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 41.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.