Literature DB >> 32097295

Obesity and Breast Reconstruction: Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Study.

Dhivya R Srinivasa1, Mark W Clemens1, Ji Qi1, Jennifer B Hamill1, Hyungjin M Kim1, Andrea L Pusic1, Edwin G Wilkins1, Charles E Butler1, Patrick B Garvey1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors' purpose was to evaluate the effects of body mass index, as defined by World Health Organization criteria, on complications and patient-reported outcomes in implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Complications and BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes were analyzed 2 years after breast reconstruction for women from 11 participating sites. Separate mixed-effects regressions were performed to assess body mass index effects on outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 2259 patients (1625 implant-based and 634 autologous) were included. Women with class II/III obesity had higher risks of any complication in both the implant (OR, 1.66; p = 0.03) and autologous (OR, 3.35; p < 0.001) groups, and higher risks of major complications in both the implant (OR, 1.71, p = 0.04) and autologous (OR, 2.72; p = 0.001) groups, compared with underweight/normal weight patients. Both class I (OR, 1.97; p = 0.03) and class II/III (OR, 3.30; p = 0.001) obesity patients experienced higher reconstructive failures in the implant cohort. Class I obesity implant patients reported significantly lower Satisfaction with Breasts scores (mean difference, -5.37; p = 0.007). Body mass index did not significantly affect patient-reported outcomes for autologous reconstruction patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Obesity was associated with higher risks for complications in both implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction; however, it only significantly affected reconstruction failure and patient-reported outcomes in the implant reconstruction patients. Quality-of-life benefits and surgical risk should be presented to each patient as they relate to her body mass index, to optimize shared decision-making for breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32097295     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  The investigation of the relation between expansion strategy and outcomes of two-stage expander-implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Min Ji Kim; Woo Beom Lee; Il Jae Lee; Hyung Min Hahn; Duy Quang Thai; Ji Young Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

2.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Does Saving the Nipple Impact Short- and Long-Term Patient Satisfaction?

Authors:  Bridget N Kelly; Heather R Faulkner; Barbara L Smith; Jenna E Korotkin; Conor R Lanahan; Carson Brown; Michele A Gadd; Michelle C Specht; Kevin S Hughes; T Salewa Oseni; Amy S Colwell; Suzanne B Coopey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Restoring Breast Volume in High BMI Patients: A Single-Center Review of Breast Reconstruction Using Hyperinflated Saline Implants.

Authors:  Milind D Kachare; Swapnil D Kachare; Bradley J Vivace; Omar Elfanagely; Brooke Barrow; Adam O'Toole; Alyssa M Simpson; Rachel Safeek; Joshua H Choo; Terry M McCurry; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-07-21

4.  Mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: Results of a mono-centric 4-years cohort.

Authors:  Olivia Quilichini; Julien Barrou; Marie Bannier; Sandrine Rua; Aurore Van Troy; Laura Sabiani; Eric Lambaudie; Monique Cohen; Gilles Houvenaeghel
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-12-31

5.  BMI Specific Complications Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy.

Authors:  Helena Sophie Leitner; Reinhard Pauzenberger; Ines Ana Ederer; Christine Radtke; Stefan Hacker
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Salvage of infected implant-based breast reconstructions in morbidly obese patients with explantation and replacement with an autologous muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap.

Authors:  Jean-Claude D Schwartz
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-03-08

7.  Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Toni L Storm-Dickerson; Vivian Chan; Rob Lord; Erin O'Rorke; G Patrick Maxwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-04-13

8.  Breast Reconstruction Completion in the Obese: Does Reconstruction Technique Make a Difference in Its Achievement?

Authors:  Christine Velazquez; Robert C Siska; Ivo A Pestana
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 9.  Submuscular and Pre-Pectoral ADM Assisted Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Roberto Cuomo
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Muscle-sparing Latissimus Dorsi: A Safe Option for Postmastectomy Reconstruction in Extremely Obese Patients.

Authors:  Jean-Claude D Schwartz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.