Literature DB >> 32097120

Super Learner for Survival Data Prediction.

Marzieh K Golmakani1, Eric C Polley2.   

Abstract

Survival analysis is a widely used method to establish a connection between a time to event outcome and a set of potential covariates. Accurately predicting the time of an event of interest is of primary importance in survival analysis. Many different algorithms have been proposed for survival prediction. However, for a given prediction problem it is rarely, if ever, possible to know in advance which algorithm will perform the best. In this paper we propose two algorithms for constructing super learners in survival data prediction where the individual algorithms are based on proportional hazards. A super learner is a flexible approach to statistical learning that finds the best weighted ensemble of the individual algorithms. Finding the optimal combination of the individual algorithms through minimizing cross-validated risk controls for over-fitting of the final ensemble learner. Candidate algorithms may range from a basic Cox model to tree-based machine learning algorithms, assuming all candidate algorithms are based on the proportional hazards framework. The ensemble weights are estimated by minimizing the cross-validated negative log partial likelihood. We compare the performance of the proposed super learners with existing models through extensive simulation studies. In all simulation scenarios, the proposed super learners are either the best fit or near the best fit. The performances of the newly proposed algorithms are also demonstrated with clinical data examples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CoxBoost; Regularized Cox regression; concordance index; cross-validation; gradient boosted machines; super learner

Year:  2020        PMID: 32097120     DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2019-0065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  9 in total

1.  Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study.

Authors:  Leila R Zelnick; Michael G Shlipak; Elsayed Z Soliman; Amanda Anderson; Robert Christenson; James Lash; Rajat Deo; Panduranga Rao; Farsad Afshinnia; Jing Chen; Jiang He; Stephen Seliger; Raymond Townsend; Debbie L Cohen; Alan Go; Nisha Bansal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 10.614

Review 2.  A scoping methodological review of simulation studies comparing statistical and machine learning approaches to risk prediction for time-to-event data.

Authors:  Hayley Smith; Michael Sweeting; Tim Morris; Michael J Crowther
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment.

Authors:  Jeph Herrin; Neena S Abraham; Xiaoxi Yao; Peter A Noseworthy; Jonathan Inselman; Nilay D Shah; Che Ngufor
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

4.  Serial circulating tumor DNA to predict early recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Gui-Qi Zhu; Wei-Ren Liu; Zheng Tang; Wei-Feng Qu; Yuan Fang; Xi-Fei Jiang; Shu-Shu Song; Han Wang; Chen-Yang Tao; Pei-Yun Zhou; Run Huang; Jun Gao; Hai-Xiang Sun; Zhen-Bin Ding; Yuan-Fei Peng; Zhi Dai; Jian Zhou; Jia Fan; Ying-Hong Shi
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Predictors of Covid-19 level of concern among older adults from the health and retirement study.

Authors:  Hind A Beydoun; May A Beydoun; Jordan Weiss; Rana S Gautam; Sharmin Hossain; Brook T Alemu; Alan B Zonderman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Individual dynamic prediction of clinical endpoint from large dimensional longitudinal biomarker history: a landmark approach.

Authors:  Anthony Devaux; Robin Genuer; Karine Peres; Cécile Proust-Lima
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.612

Review 7.  The promise of automated machine learning for the genetic analysis of complex traits.

Authors:  Elisabetta Manduchi; Joseph D Romano; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.881

8.  Uncertainty in lung cancer stage for survival estimation via set-valued classification.

Authors:  Savannah Bergquist; Gabriel A Brooks; Mary Beth Landrum; Nancy L Keating; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Determinants of COVID-19 Outcome as Predictors of Delayed Healthcare Services among Adults ≥50 Years during the Pandemic: 2006-2020 Health and Retirement Study.

Authors:  Hind A Beydoun; May A Beydoun; Brook T Alemu; Jordan Weiss; Sharmin Hossain; Rana S Gautam; Alan B Zonderman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.614

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.