Literature DB >> 32096585

On the complementarity of DNA barcoding and morphology to distinguish benign endemic insects from possible pests: the case of Dirioxa pornia and the tribe Acanthonevrini (Diptera: Tephritidae: Phytalmiinae) in Australia.

Francesco Martoni1, Isabel Valenzuela1, Mark J Blacket1.   

Abstract

Fruit flies are considered economically important insects due to some species being agricultural pests. However, morphological identification of fruit fly adults and larvae can be difficult requiring a high level of taxonomic expertise, with misidentifications causing problematic false-positive/negative results. While destructive molecular techniques can assist with the identification process, these often cannot be applied where it is mandatory to retain a voucher reference specimen. In this work, we non-destructively (and partial-destructively) processed larvae and adults mostly belonging to the species Dirioxa pornia (Walker, 1849), of the poorly studied nonpest fruit fly tribe Acanthonevrini (Tephritidae) from Australia, to enable molecular identifications whilst retaining morphological vouchers. By retaining the morphological features of specimens, we confirmed useful characters for genus/species-level identification, contributing to improved accuracy for future diagnostics using both molecular and morphological approaches. We provide DNA barcode information for three species of Acanthonevrini known from Australia, which prior to our study was only available for a single species, D. pornia. Our specimen examinations provide new distribution records for three nonpest species: Acanthonevroides variegatus Permkam and Hancock, 1995 in South Australia, Acanthonevroides basalis (Walker, 1853) and D. pornia in Victoria, Australia; as well as new host plant records for D. pornia, from kangaroo apple, apricot and loquat.
© 2020 The Authors. Insect Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; COI; biodiversity; biosecurity; fruit flies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32096585      PMCID: PMC7818419          DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insect Sci        ISSN: 1672-9609            Impact factor:   3.262


  14 in total

1.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  DNA barcoding for biosecurity: case studies from the UK plant protection program.

Authors:  Jennifer Hodgetts; Jozef C Ostojá-Starzewski; Thomas Prior; Rebecca Lawson; Jayne Hall; Neil Boonham
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.166

3.  Barcoding Queensland Fruit Flies (Bactrocera tryoni): impediments and improvements.

Authors:  Mark J Blacket; Linda Semeraro; Mallik B Malipatil
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  Strategies to improve usability and preserve accuracy in biological sequence databases.

Authors:  Johan Bengtsson-Palme; Fredrik Boulund; Robert Edström; Amir Feizi; Anna Johnning; Viktor A Jonsson; Fredrik H Karlsson; Chandan Pal; Mariana Buongermino Pereira; Anna Rehammar; José Sanchez; Kemal Sanli; Kaisa Thorell
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Li; Christina Knyaz; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.

Authors:  O Folmer; M Black; W Hoeh; R Lutz; R Vrijenhoek
Journal:  Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-10

Review 7.  Prospects and challenges of implementing DNA metabarcoding for high-throughput insect surveillance.

Authors:  Alexander M Piper; Jana Batovska; Noel O I Cogan; John Weiss; John Paul Cunningham; Brendan C Rodoni; Mark J Blacket
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org).

Authors:  Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Mol Ecol Notes       Date:  2007-05-01

9.  DNA barcoding and a precise morphological comparison revealed a cryptic species in the Nippolachnus piri complex (Hemiptera: Aphididae: Lachninae).

Authors:  Mariusz Kanturski; Yerim Lee; Jinyeong Choi; Seunghwan Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too "universal"?

Authors:  Monika Mioduchowska; Michał Jan Czyż; Bartłomiej Gołdyn; Jarosław Kur; Jerzy Sell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Disentangling bias for non-destructive insect metabarcoding.

Authors:  Francesco Martoni; Alexander M Piper; Brendan C Rodoni; Mark J Blacket
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Ecological and Morphological Differentiation Among COI Haplotype Groups in the Plant Parasitic Nematode Species Mesocriconema Xenoplax.

Authors:  Julianne N Matczyszyn; Timothy Harris; Kirsten Powers; Sydney E Everhart; Thomas O Powers
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 1.481

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.