| Literature DB >> 32096088 |
O Guillaume1,2, B Pérez-Köhler3,4,5, B Schädl6,7,8, C Keibl6,7, N Saxenhuber6,7, P Heimel6,7,8, E Priglinger6,7, S Wolbank6,7, H Redl6,7, A Petter-Puchner6,9, R Fortelny6,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The interest in non-manipulated cells originating from adipose tissue has raised tremendously in the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The resulting stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells have been successfully used in numerous clinical applications. The aim of this experimental work is, first to combine a macroporous synthetic mesh with SVF isolated using a mechanical disruption process, and to assess the effect of those cells on the early healing phase of hernia.Entities:
Keywords: Abdominal hernia; Adipose tissue; Angiogenesis; Mesh; Stromal vascular fraction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32096088 PMCID: PMC7701131 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02135-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hernia ISSN: 1248-9204 Impact factor: 4.739
Fig. 1Onlay model used to evaluate the healing response of SVF-coated mesh. Hernia defects of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 were created on each side of the linea alba of the abdominal wall of nude rats (defect is shown with the blue arrow, a). The created defects were either covered with SVF-coated mesh or with cell-free fibrin-coated mesh as control group (the yellow arrow denotes the SVF covering the hernia defect, b and c). Scale bars represent 1 cm in a and b
Fig. 2Processing fat tissue and mesh coating. Following liposuction, adipose tissue is processed through mechanical disruption in sterile condition (a). After centrifugation of the resulting fluid at 1200g for 7 min, only the SVF was collected (b), and subsequently washed. SVF cells were mixed with fibrin gel and used to cover the surface of a synthetic macroporous mesh (c and d)
Fig. 3SVF cell behavior on 2D and 3D culture systems and viability over time. Illustration of the SVF cell adhesion kinetic at day 1, 7, and 10 (a, b and c, respectively) after plating onto tissue-culture polystyrene (two dimension). Appreciation of the cell viability in vitro using Live/Dead staining after coating 1 cm2 of mesh with 400,000 cells (three dimension), at day 2 (e and f) and 21 (h and i). Corresponding bright-field views are shown in d and g for day 2 and 21, respectively. Living cells appear in green fluorescence (e and h) and dead cells appear in red fluorescence (f and i). Scale bars represent 100 µm
Fig. 4Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging of the SVF-coated meshes. SEM was conducted at day 2 (a and b) and at day 21 (c and d) after SVF seeding. Scale bars represent 100 µm for pictures a, c and d and 10 µm for picture b
Morphological assessment of the macroscopic mesh integration and other complications at 10 days and 21 days post-operatively
| Macroscopic observation | Day 10 | Day 10 | Day 21 | Day 21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesh shrinkage (in %) | 0, 30, 0, 0, 0, 0 | 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 | 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 | 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 |
| Tissue integration (in %) | 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100 | 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100 | 100, 100, 100, 90, 100, 100, 100 | 85, 100, 90, 100, 100, 100, 100 |
| Complications | None | None | None | None |
Fig. 5Effect of SVF coating on the degree of vascularization. Doppler analysis of the mesh vascularization conducted after 21 days of implantation for control (in black symbols) compared to SVF-coated meshes (in red symbols) for every animals (a). Illustration of the intensity of the vascular flow mapped using the doppler system, given as example for the rat 1 with the corresponding macroscopic observation of the two groups. The dash lines delineate the area of the abdominal wall covered with the mesh (b). Illustration of H&E staining revealing vascularization of fibrin-coated mesh (c, day 21, the black arrows point the vessels and the star denotes the mesh cross section), along with the quantification of vessel cross sections (d, $ denotes significance between control group day 10 versus day 21). Illustration of 3D reconstruction of perfused vascular branches using high-resolution microCT of SVF-coated mesh (e) with the resulting ratio volume vessel to volume tissue expressed in percentage for three animals of each group per time point, calculated form the middle of the explanted graft (1 cm2, f). The mean values for both group at both time point is shown with the bars with a grid pattern, with $ denoting significance between SVF and fibrin-coated mesh at only day 21
Fig. 6Quality of the mesh integration. Appreciation of the fiber density of the peri-prosthetic neoformed tissue (a, 1-very loose; 2-loose; 3-dense; 4-very dense, no statistic difference was observed between the groups). Intensity of the immune response was analyzed by counting the foreign-body giant cells (no statistical difference was noted between control and SVF-coated group, but only between day 10 and day 21 for control- ($) and SVF-coated group (!), b). H&E staining of SVF-coated group day 21 (scale bar represents 50 µm, black star denotes the mesh cross section, black arrows point the foreign-body giant cells and blue triangles show the vessels, c)
Fig. 7Human SVF cells were detected 10 days post-surgery at the implantation site. Positive anti-human mitochondrial immunostaining was detected by the brown color (denoted with the black arrows) between the filaments of the mesh (denoted with the black stars). Scale bars represent 100 µm