Literature DB >> 32096022

A scoping review and network meta-analysis for efficacy and safety of glaucoma medication in Japanese patients.

Kenji Inoue1, Kyoko Ishida2, Goji Tomita2, Hisashi Noma3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of glaucoma medication in Japanese patients, network meta-analysis (NMA) of an intraocular pressure(IOP) reduction, adverse reaction rates and conjunctival congestion rates of major glaucoma drugs used in clinical practice in Japan were conducted using the new drug application (NDA) data. STUDY
DESIGN: Scoping network meta-analysis.
METHODS: Out of all clinical trials in the interview forms of major glaucoma drugs approved in Japan as of July 2015, active-control clinical trials with Japanese patients were identified through screening with specific criteria. The details of IOP reduction, adverse reaction rates and conjunctival hyperemia rates of the trials were collected from published articles, package inserts, interview forms and Summary basis of approval made by Japan Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). The mean difference in IOP reduction, adverse reaction rates, and conjunctival hyperemia rates of eligible trials were assessed using NMA as referenced to those of timolol maleate 0.5%.
RESULTS: Eleven multicenter trials of ten medications in total, (five prostaglandin (PG) analogs, three β-blockers, one α-1 blocker, and one α-2 stimulator) were selected. The mean difference in IOP reduction in mmHg with 95% confidence intervals were as follows: bimatoprost -3.00 (-3.71; -2.29), tafluprost -2.45 (-3.65; -1.25), travoprost -2.35 (-3.41; -1.29), and latanoprost -2.05 (-2.72; -1.38). The highest IOP reduction was achieved by PG analogs. Adverse reaction rates and conjunctival hyperemia rates were significantly larger with PG analogs than with other medications.
CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of glaucoma medications were assessed by NMA as reference to those of timolol maleate 0.5% in Japanese patients. PG analogs were the most efficacious in reducing IOP. However, PG analogs were also associated with higher rates of adverse reactions and conjunctival hyperemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficacy; Glaucoma medications; Japanese patients; Network meta-analysis; Safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32096022     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-019-00708-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  13 in total

1.  The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  H C Bucher; G H Guyatt; L E Griffith; S D Walter
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool.

Authors:  Georgia Salanti
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.273

3.  The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing timolol with brimonidine in the treatment of glaucoma.

Authors:  Seng Chee Loon; Gerald Liew; Adrian Fung; Sharon E Reid; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 5.  Comparative Effectiveness of First-Line Medications for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tianjing Li; Kristina Lindsley; Benjamin Rouse; Hwanhee Hong; Qiyuan Shi; David S Friedman; Richard Wormald; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.

Authors:  Brian Hutton; Georgia Salanti; Deborah M Caldwell; Anna Chaimani; Christopher H Schmid; Chris Cameron; John P A Ioannidis; Sharon Straus; Kristian Thorlund; Jeroen P Jansen; Cynthia Mulrow; Ferrán Catalá-López; Peter C Gøtzsche; Kay Dickersin; Isabelle Boutron; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies.

Authors:  J P T Higgins; D Jackson; J K Barrett; G Lu; A E Ades; I R White
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.273

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of different regimens for primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei Li; Wenbin Huang; Xiulan Zhang
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Efficacy and safety of prostaglandin analogues in patients with predominantly primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oghenowede Eyawo; Jean Nachega; Pierre Lefebvre; David Meyer; Beth Rachlis; Chia-Wen Lee; Steven Kelly; Edward Mills
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-03

Review 10.  Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence.

Authors:  Deborah M Caldwell; A E Ades; J P T Higgins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-15
View more
  2 in total

1.  Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Omidenepag Isopropyl in Patients with Normal-Tension Glaucoma.

Authors:  Kenji Inoue; Junji Inoue; Shiho Kunimatsu-Sanuki; Norie Nozaki; Kosuke Shimizu; Kyoko Ishida; Goji Tomita
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-30

2.  Visual cortex damage in a ferret model of ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Megumi Honjo; Hiroshi Kawasaki; Makoto Aihara
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.447

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.