Literature DB >> 32095756

Free-Living Physical Activity Monitoring in Adult US Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Using a Consumer Wearable Device.

Pronabesh DasMahapatra1, Emil Chiauzzi1, Rishi Bhalerao1, Jane Rhodes2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Wearable devices have been used to characterize physical activity in multiple sclerosis (MS). The objectives of this study were to advance the literature on the utility of free-living physical activity tracking from secondary analyses of a pilot study in MS patients.
METHOD: The original observational study was conducted in participants with MS at PatientsLikeMe (PatientsLikeMe (www.PatientsLikeMe.com), an online network of patients with chronic diseases. Participants completed a baseline self-assessment, and received a Fitbit One<sup>TM</sup> wearable device with instructions to upload data. Eligible participants (1) self-reported MS, (2) logged on to the PatientsLikeMe website 90 days prior to enrollment, and (3) consented to participate electronically. Participants (1) < 18 years, (2) living outside the United States, and (3) requiring wheelchair assistance for most daily activities were excluded. The secondary analyses were limited to participants with complete data on MS type, disease duration, and Multiple Sclerosis Rating Scale (MSRS) and at least 7 days of wearable data. Step count was used as a measure of physical activity.
RESULTS: The analysis cohort of 114 participants uploaded a mean of 20.1 days of wearable data over the 23-day study (87% adherence); participants averaged 4,393 steps per day. The mean age of participants was 52 years, predominantly female (75%), relapsing-remitting type (79%), with mean disease duration of 16 years. Mean MSRS score within 30-day of baseline was 32; 72% reported mild-moderate walking disability. The reliability of step count measured by intraclass correlation was 0.55 for a single day, ≥0.7 for 2-day average, and ≥0.9 for 7-day average. After controlling for covariates, self-reported disease severity (MSRS quartile) was an independent predictor of step count (p < 0.001). Least square means (LS means) for participants that were least disabled (lowest quartile) was 5,937 steps, which was significantly higher than participants in the second, third, and fourth quartiles (4,570, 3,490, and 3,272, respectively). Similarly, LS means of participants with no ambulatory disability (measured by MSRS walk component) was 6,931 steps, significantly higher than participants with greater disability (4,743, 4,394, 2,727 steps for symptomatic, mild, and moderate disability, respectively, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Using an interactive platform, this study captured free-living mobility data in MS patients. Important metrics such as the use of a minimum of 2-day estimates and self-reported disability were found to be robust indicators and correlates, respectively, of participant activity levels. Further triangulation of such metrics may reduce the burden on patients, clinicians, and researchers when monitoring clinical status.
Copyright © 2018 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity monitors; Biaxial/triaxial accelerometer devices; Conventional wearable devices; Digital devices; Mobility; Multiple sclerosis; Objective data; Patient-reported outcomes; Wearable physical activity monitoring

Year:  2018        PMID: 32095756      PMCID: PMC7015360          DOI: 10.1159/000488040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digit Biomark        ISSN: 2504-110X


  35 in total

1.  The power of social networking in medicine.

Authors:  Catherine A Brownstein; John S Brownstein; David S Williams; Paul Wicks; James A Heywood
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  The bit doesn't fit: Evaluation of a commercial activity-tracker at slower walking speeds.

Authors:  Christopher K Wong; Helena M Mentis; Ravi Kuber
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Steps per day among persons with multiple sclerosis: variation by demographic, clinical, and device characteristics.

Authors:  Deirdre Dlugonski; Lara A Pilutti; Brian M Sandroff; Yoojin Suh; Swathi Balantrapu; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Self-Tracking, Social Media and Personal Health Records for Patient Empowered Self-Care. Contribution of the IMIA Social Media Working Group.

Authors:  C Paton; M Hansen; L Fernandez-Luque; A Y S Lau
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2012

5.  Reliability of daily step activity monitoring in adults with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Saori Ishikawa; Sandy L Stevens; Minsoo Kang; Don W Morgan
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

6.  The effect of walking mobility on the measurement of physical activity using accelerometry in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Erin M Snook; Robert W Motl; Rachael C Gliottoni
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 7.  Biosensing in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Andrew Yousef; Soren Jonzzon; Leena Suleiman; Jennifer Arjona; Jennifer S Graves
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  The multiple sclerosis rating scale, revised (MSRS-R): development, refinement, and psychometric validation using an online community.

Authors:  Paul Wicks; Timothy E Vaughan; Michael P Massagli
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Michelle M Goto; Robert D Furberg
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Exploring Concordance of Patient-Reported Information on PatientsLikeMe and Medical Claims Data at the Patient Level.

Authors:  Gabriel S Eichler; Elisenda Cochin; Jian Han; Sylvia Hu; Timothy E Vaughan; Paul Wicks; Charles Barr; Jenny Devenport
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The Digital Neurologic Examination.

Authors:  Adam B Cohen; Brain V Nahed
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-26

2.  Predicting Participant Compliance With Fitness Tracker Wearing and Ecological Momentary Assessment Protocols in Information Workers: Observational Study.

Authors:  Gonzalo J Martinez; Stephen M Mattingly; Pablo Robles-Granda; Koustuv Saha; Anusha Sirigiri; Jessica Young; Nitesh Chawla; Munmun De Choudhury; Sidney D'Mello; Gloria Mark; Aaron Striegel
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 3.  The Impact of Wearable Technologies in Health Research: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sophie Huhn; Miriam Axt; Hanns-Christian Gunga; Martina Anna Maggioni; Stephen Munga; David Obor; Ali Sié; Valentin Boudo; Aditi Bunker; Rainer Sauerborn; Till Bärnighausen; Sandra Barteit
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Human-Centered Design Strategies for Device Selection in mHealth Programs: Development of a Novel Framework and Case Study.

Authors:  Ashley Marie Polhemus; Jan Novák; Jose Ferrao; Sara Simblett; Marta Radaelli; Patrick Locatelli; Faith Matcham; Maximilian Kerz; Janice Weyer; Patrick Burke; Vincy Huang; Marissa Fallon Dockendorf; Gergely Temesi; Til Wykes; Giancarlo Comi; Inez Myin-Germeys; Amos Folarin; Richard Dobson; Nikolay V Manyakov; Vaibhav A Narayan; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.773

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.