| Literature DB >> 32095630 |
A Lachenmayer1, D Gebbers1, B Gottstein2, D Candinas1, G Beldi1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Recent experimental data has revealed that the course of alveolar echinococcosis (AE) depends on adaptive immunity. For this study, we aimed to analyze the incidence and outcome of AE in immunocompromised humans.Entities:
Keywords: Alveolar echinococcosis, (AE); Benzimidazole; Echinoccocosis; Echinococcus multilocularis; Echinococcus multilocularis, (E. multilocularis); Immunosuppression; alveolar_echinococcosis; benzimidazole, (BZM); immunocompetent, (ICT); immunocompromised, (ICR)
Year: 2019 PMID: 32095630 PMCID: PMC7034048 DOI: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Waterborne Parasitol ISSN: 2405-6766
Clinical data.
| n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Patients | 131 |
| Female gender | 68 (52%) |
| Mean age at diagnosis (range) | 54 (18–88) |
| Patients with incidental diagnosis | 65 (50%) |
| Patients with potential risk factors | 16/65 (25%) |
| Immunocompromised patients | 41 (31%) |
Information was only available for 65 patients.
Fig. 1Distribution of the different immune system compromising conditions of the patients.
Fig. 2Incidence of new cases of immunocompetent (ICT) and immunocompromised (ICR) patients organized by decades showing a significant increase of new cases over time (p = 0.0273) and from the second last to the last decade for ICT patients (p = 0.0004) and ICR patients (p = 0.005).
Fig. 3Levels of antibodies against EgHF, Em2 and Em18 at initial diagnosis and 1st follow-up in immunocompetent (ICT) and immunocompromised (ICR) patients. Horizontal bars represent the median. The figure shows a significant decrease of the antibody levels against all 3 antigens after treatment for ICR and for ICT patients (Fig. 3, p ≤ 0.001, Wilcoxon sign-ranktest).
Histopathological data.
| Immunocompetent patients | Immunocompromised patients | |
|---|---|---|
| Median tumor diameter (range) | 8 ± 4.5 (0.6–20) cm | 7 ± 3.7 (1–15.2) cm |
| P1 | 40/59 (68%) | 14/19 (74%) |
| P2 | 21/59 (36%) | 3/19 (16%) |
| P3 | 10/59 (17%) | 2/19 (11%) |
| P4 | 7/59 (12%) | 0/19 (0%) |
| N0 | 44/65 (68%) | 15/19 (79%) |
| N1 | 21/65 (32%) | 4/19 (21%) |
| R0 | 45/63 (71%) | 17/18 (94%) |
| R1 | 17/63 (29%) | 1/18 (6%) |
| Parasite activity | 25/50 (50%) | 11/18 (61%) |
(P = parasitic mass in the liver, N = involvement of neighbouring organs, and R = resection status).
Fig. 4Recurrence-free survival Kaplan-Meier curves comparing (A) resection status RO with R1 (B) adjuvant treatment with BZM for <1 year with treatment ≥2 years and, (C) adjuvant treatment with BZM <2 years with treatment ≥2 years post resection. Statistical differences were calculated by the log rank test.
Fig. 5Overall survival Kaplan-Meier curves comparing (A) surgical treatment with conservative treatment with BZM and (B) immunocompetent with IC conditions. Statistical differences were calculated by the log rank test.