| Literature DB >> 32095443 |
Hyunju Yun1, Bora Lee1, Sung Jae Lee2, Clara Yongjoo Park1.
Abstract
Menopausal symptoms can persist or worsen even years after menopause and affect women's quality of life. We investigated whether menopausal symptoms were alleviated through a marine healing program and if sea mustard intake additionally benefits these symptoms. A total of 42 menopausal women self-selected to participate as the marine (n = 22) or city group (n = 20). The marine group participated in a 5-day marine healing program consisting of a balanced diet, exercise, and mind-body practices using ocean resources. The city group continued one's daily routine without any intervention. Within the marine group, participants were randomly assigned to consume sea mustard (Undaria pinnatifida) (15.4 g dry weight/day; n = 11) or control (n = 11). Changes in menopausal symptoms were measured using the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) before, immediately after, and 2 weeks after the end of the marine healing program. The city group completed the MRS at baseline and on day 20. Within subject differences of menopausal symptoms between baseline and immediately after the marine healing program were assessed using paired t-test. Intervention effects were assessed by mixed analysis of variance. Somatic, psychological, and urogenital symptoms were immediately alleviated after the marine healing program. No effect of sea mustard was detected in the marine group. After 2 weeks, the effect of marine healing persisted in physical and mental exhaustion only. A 5-day integrated marine healing program, but not additional sea mustard intake, temporarily alleviated menopausal symptoms. The reduction in physical and mental exhaustion after marine healing can be maintained for 2 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0004025.Entities:
Keywords: Marine healing; Menopause; Quality of life; Seaweed; Undaria
Year: 2019 PMID: 32095443 PMCID: PMC7015728 DOI: 10.7762/cnr.2020.9.1.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Nutr Res ISSN: 2287-3732
Figure 1Study design. The marine group participated in a 5-day marine healing program. Diet was controlled for these 5 days. Within the marine group, the marine seaweed group additionally consumed sea mustard during the controlled feeding period (day 0–5, 15.4 g [dry weight]/day) and free-living period (8 packets of seaweed noodles per 13 days [180 g/packet]). The city group did not receive any intervention.
▲, menopause rating scale survey.
Marine healing program schedule
| Day | Program schedule |
|---|---|
| Day 1 | • Watsu |
| • Walking the beach | |
| Day 2 | • Local tour |
| • Cranial sacral therapy | |
| • Seawater sauna | |
| Day 3 | • Gyrokinesis |
| • Foot reflexology | |
| • Hangul vocalization | |
| Day 4 | • Hangul vocalization |
| • Nordic walking | |
| • Seawater sauna | |
| • Spine stretching exercise | |
| Day 5 | • Hangul vocalization |
| • Neck and shoulder strengthening |
Figure 2Marine group implementing the marine healing program. (A) ‘Watsu’ using sea water and (B) mind and body relaxation exercise using sea sand and sea breeze.
Subject characteristics*
| Characteristics | Marine seaweed (n = 11) | Marine control (n = 11) | p value | Marine group (n = 22) | City group (n = 20) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, year | 53.45 ± 5.35 | 55.64 ± 5.12 | 0.34 | 54.55 ± 5.23 | 52.65 ± 3.59 | 0.18 | |
| Menarche age, year | 15.27 ± 1.62 | 15.18 ± 2.09 | 0.91 | 15.23 ± 1.82 | 14.89 ± 1.41 | 0.52 | |
| Menopause age, year | 51.33 ± 2.65 | 49.70 ± 4.55 | 0.36 | 50.47 ± 3.76 | 50.25 ± 1.61 | 0.82 | |
| Height, cm | 155.9 ± 5.53 | 156.8 ± 4.29 | 0.67 | 156.4 ± 4.85 | 160.3 ± 4.95 | 0.01 | |
| Weight, kg | 54.9 ± 4.53 | 58.7 ± 10.16 | 0.28 | 56.80 ± 7.92 | 60.34 ± 9.34 | 0.19 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.69 ± 2.77 | 23.92 ± 4.45 | 0.45 | 23.31 ± 3.67 | 23.45 ± 3.28 | 0.89 | |
| Marital state | 1.00 | 0.69 | |||||
| Married | 10 (90.9) | 9 (81.8) | 19 (86.4) | 16 (80) | |||
| Single/divorced/widowed | 1 (9.1) | 2 (18.2) | 3 (13.6) | 4 (20) | |||
| Person living together | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
| Alone | 1 (9.1) | 1 (9.1) | 2 (9.1) | 2 (10) | |||
| Not alone | 10 (90.9) | 10 (90.9) | 20 (90.9) | 18 (90) | |||
| Education | 1.00 | 0.69 | |||||
| ≤ High school graduate | 7 (63.6) | 6 (54.5) | 13 (59.1) | 13 (65) | |||
| ≥ College graduate | 4 (36.4) | 5 (45.5) | 9 (40.9) | 7 (35) | |||
| Sleep time | 5.91 ± 1.76 | 6.27 ± 1.19 | 0.58 | 6.09 ± 1.48 | 6.43 ± 0.94 | 0.39 | |
| Employment status | 1.00 | 0.03 | |||||
| Yes | 4 (36.4) | 3 (27.3) | 7 (31.8) | 13 (65) | |||
| No | 7 (63.6) | 8 (72.7) | 15 (68.2) | 7 (35) | |||
| Income | 1.00 | 0.36 | |||||
| ≤ 3,000,000, Korean won | 3 (30) | 3 (30) | 6 (30) | 8 (44.4) | |||
| ≥ 3,000,000, Korean won | 7 (70) | 7 (70) | 14 (70) | 10 (55.6) | |||
| Exercise | 1.00 | 0.75 | |||||
| Yes | 6 (54.5) | 5 (45.5) | 11 (50) | 11 (55) | |||
| No | 5 (45.5) | 6 (54.5) | 11 (50) | 9 (45) | |||
Values are mean ± standard deviation or number (%).
*Comparisons between the marine seaweed and marine control, and between the marine and city group were made by Students t-test or χ2 test. The number of participants missing data for age at menarche: n = 1, age at menopause: n = 3, and income: n = 2.
Mean nutrient intakes of the marine control group and marine seaweed group during the 5-day controlled feeding period
| Variables | Marine control | Marine seaweed | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy, kcal | 1,669.80 ± 194.44 | 1,678.18 ± 183.29 | 0.95 |
| Carbohydrate, g | 238.18 ± 24.29 | 243.33 ± 27.26 | 0.76 |
| Fat, g | 43.91 ± 25.84 | 44.23 ± 25.73 | 0.99 |
| Protein, g | 76.54 ± 12.03 | 78.66 ± 11.89 | 0.98 |
| Fiber, g | 21.45 ± 3.45 | 28.20 ± 4.96 | 0.04 |
| Vitamin A, µg RAE | 501.02 ± 186.12 | 548.55 ± 187.96 | 0.70 |
| Retinol, µg | 131.79 ± 115.85 | 132.66 ± 115.36 | 0.99 |
| Beta carotene, µg | 4,430.81 ± 1,508.85 | 4,990.66 ± 1,422.38 | 0.56 |
| Vitamin E, mg | 11.39 ± 2.64 | 11.72 ± 2.10 | 0.83 |
| Vitamin C, mg | 104.15 ± 56.93 | 105.90 ± 55.04 | 0.96 |
| Thiamin, mg | 1.62 ± 0.45 | 1.60 ± 0.44 | 0.95 |
| Riboflavin, mg | 1.37 ± 0.38 | 1.43 ± 0.38 | 0.81 |
| Niacin, mg | 12.05 ± 2.39 | 12.43 ± 2.22 | 0.80 |
| Vitamin B6, mg | 1.68 ± 0.32 | 1.67 ± 0.32 | 0.97 |
| Folic acid, µg | 560.32 ± 163.24 | 553.79 ± 149.44 | 0.95 |
| Calcium, mg | 457.75 ± 48.37 | 551.43 ± 46.97 | 0.01 |
| Phosphorus, mg | 1,046.72 ± 96.79 | 1,084.62 ± 95.84 | 0.55 |
| Sodium, mg | 3,095.17 ± 360.47 | 3,613.00 ± 640.74 | 0.15 |
| Potassium, mg | 3,088.46 ± 694.11 | 3,504.40 ± 858.02 | 0.42 |
| Iron, mg | 19.43 ± 6.30 | 19.54 ± 6.32 | 0.98 |
| Zinc, µg | 11.48 ± 2.81 | 11.64 ± 2.79 | 0.93 |
| Cholesterol, mg | 357.55 ± 64.28 | 361.51 ± 62.49 | 0.92 |
Intake of one subject (2,000 kcal/day) was excluded from the analyses. All other participants were aimed to provide 1,600 kcal/day. Comparisons between the marine control and marine seaweed groups were assessed using Student's t-test.
Figure 3Total MRS scores of participants that participated in marine healing by status of sea mustard consumption and time point. The thick lines represent the means of each group (marine control and marine seaweed).
MRS, Menopause Rating Scale.
Mean MRS scores of participants that participated in marine healing (marine group) and city controls by time point*
| MRS score | Marine group (n = 22) | City group (n = 20) | Treatment | Time | Treatment × time | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T1 | T3 | ||||
| MRS_1 | 1.68 ± 1.13 | 1.09 ± 0.87† | 1.41 ± 1.18 | 1.75 ± 1.12 | 1.50 ± 1.19 | 0.80 | 0.07 | 0.94 |
| MRS_2 | 1.36 ± 1.00 | 0.82 ± 1.01 | 1.14 ± 1.13 | 1.00 ± 0.92 | 0.90 ± 0.91 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| MRS_3 | 1.86 ± 1.49 | 1.32 ± 1.21 | 1.32 ± 1.21 | 2.00 ± 1.12 | 1.70 ± 0.98 | 0.44 | 0.01 | 0.46 |
| MRS_4 | 1.59 ± 1.10 | 0.68 ± 1.04† | 1.14 ± 0.89 | 1.40 ± 0.82 | 1.35 ± 0.67 | 0.96 | 0.11 | 0.20 |
| MRS_5 | 1.64 ± 1.14 | 0.95 ± 0.95† | 1.23 ± 1.15 | 1.60 ± 0.88 | 1.45 ± 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.10 | 0.45 |
| MRS_6 | 1.27 ± 1.12 | 0.68 ± 1.04† | 0.95 ± 0.95 | 1.15 ± 0.67 | 1.00 ± 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.10 | 0.54 |
| MRS_7 | 2.19 ± 1.08 | 1.14 ± 1.28† | 1.45 ± 1.18 | 1.80 ± 1.06 | 1.75 ± 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| MRS_8 | 1.50 ± 1.19 | 0.86 ± 1.17† | 1.18 ± 1.30 | 1.90 ± 1.37 | 1.50 ± 1.19 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.83 |
| MRS_9 | 1.45 ± 1.01 | 1.10 ± 1.04 | 1.09 ± 0.81 | 1.45 ± 1.23 | 0.95 ± 0.94 | 0.78 | 0.01 | 0.66 |
| MRS_10 | 1.55 ± 1.22 | 1.14 ± 1.39 | 1.10 ± 1.22 | 1.70 ± 1.26 | 1.10 ± 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.002 | 0.61 |
| MRS_11 | 1.95 ± 1.21 | 1.23 ± 1.19† | 1.59 ± 1.22 | 1.70 ± 1.22 | 1.30 ± 0.86 | 0.39 | 0.009 | 0.90 |
| Somatic | 6.86 ± 3.97 | 4.45 ± 3.20† | 5.45 ± 4.00 | 6.45 ± 3.02 | 5.40 ± 3.02 | 0.82 | 0.003 | 0.65 |
| Psychological | 6.59 ± 3.85 | 3.45 ± 3.69† | 4.77 ± 3.77 | 5.95 ± 2.42 | 5.55 ± 2.37 | 0.94 | 0.02 | 0.13 |
| Urogenital | 4.50 ± 2.82 | 3.05 ± 2.87† | 3.32 ± 2.78 | 5.05 ± 3.09 | 3.55 ± 2.42 | 0.60 | 0.002 | 0.70 |
| Total | 17.95 ± 9.08 | 10.95 ± 8.81† | 13.55 ± 9.41 | 17.45 ± 7.13 | 14.50 ± 6.92 | 0.92 | 0.0008 | 0.47 |
MRS, Menopause Rating Scale.
*Analyses were performed by mixed analysis of variance to compare T1 and T3 of the marine and city group. Within the marine group, paired t-test was used to assessed the difference between T1 and T2; †p < 0.05.