| Literature DB >> 32095336 |
Cheng-Long Yang1, Xue-Yan Yuan2,3, Jie Zhang1, Wei-Hong Sun2,3, Zhong-Jian Liu2,3, Shuang-Quan Zou2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quantitativereal-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction is the common method to quantify relative gene expression. Normalizating using reliable genes is critical in correctly interpreting expression data from qRT-PCR. Euscaphis konishii is a medicinal plant with a long history in China, which has various chemical compounds in fruit. However, there is no report describing the selection of reference genes in fruit development of Euscaphis konishii.Entities:
Keywords: Euscaphis konishii; Fruit development; Reference genes; qRT-PCR
Year: 2020 PMID: 32095336 PMCID: PMC7020815 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8474
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Unigenes length distribution.
Analysis of transcriptomeand expression of candidate reference genes.
| #ID | Gene | FPKM Mean | SD | CV | FC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC-1 | FC-2 | FC-3 | |||||||
| c71660.graph_c1 | AT1G13440.1 | 4e−34 | 1,418.24 | 145.33 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.05 | |
| c67439.graph_c2 | AT5G19770.1 | 3e−68 | 165.32 | 18.28 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.08 | |
| c67539.graph_c0 | AT3G01480.1 | 1e−59 | 19.10 | 3.07 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.01 | |
| c67010.graph_c0 | AT2G16920.1 | 2e−158 | 18.30 | 2.05 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.04 | |
| c62586.graph_c0 | AT3G52590.1 | 3e−10 | 230.36 | 21.98 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.18 | |
| c65728.graph_c0 | AT3G15020.2 | 5e−35 | 187.30 | 18.88 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 0.08 | |
| c63030.graph_c0 | AT3G47520.1 | 2e−19 | 19.87 | 1.95 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.03 | |
| c63658.graph_c0 | AT5G09810.1 | 2e−38 | 407.67 | 35.20 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.08 | |
Notes.
Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million fragments mapped; SD
coefficient variation
flod change
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase c-2
Tubulin alpha-3
cyclophilin 38
Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 23
Ubiquitin extension protein 1
Lactate/malate dehydrogenase family protein
malate dehydrogenase
actin 7
Genes and primer sets usedfor qRT-PCR analysis.
| #ID | Gene name | Primer sequence | Length | Distance from 3′ | Anneal temp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c71660.graph_c1 | F:CCGTGTTCCTACTGTTGATGT | 95 | 1,244 | 62.0 | |
| R:CCTCCTTGATAGCAGCCTTAAT | 1,338 | 61.9 | |||
| c67439.graph_c2 | F:GGGTGGTAGCAAACCCTATTAC | 103 | 203 | 62.4 | |
| R:CCGAAGGTGCAGATGATGAA | 305 | 62.2 | |||
| c67539.graph_c0 | F:ATCTGTTGGAACTCCTCCATTC | 114 | 2,251 | 62.0 | |
| R:AGCCCTGAAGCAAGGTAAAG | 2,364 | 62.2 | |||
| c67010.graph_c0 | F:AGCCACATAATCTCCGTGTAAG | 105 | 4,161 | 62.0 | |
| R:GCTGACCATGTTCGAGTAGTT | 4,265 | 62.0 | |||
| c62586.graph_c0 | F:ACGAGCCAAAGCCATCAA | 105 | 1,435 | 62.0 | |
| R:GGCCGAACTCTTGCTGATTA | 1,539 | 62.2 | |||
| c65728.graph_c0 | F:CATCGTAAGTCCCTGCTTTCT | 104 | 956 | 61.9 | |
| R:TGCCAAGTACTGCCCTAATG | 1,059 | 62.0 | |||
| c63030.graph_c0 | F:ATGAAGAAGTCCACGAGCTAAC | 97 | 995 | 62.1 | |
| R:GCCATAGACAGAGTAGCAGAAC | 1,091 | 62.0 | |||
| c63658.graph_c0 | F:GATCTGGCATCACACCTTCTAC | 112 | 394 | 62.3 | |
| R:CTGAGTCATCTTCTCCCTGTTG | 505 | 62.0 |
Notes.
forward primer
reverse primer
Target genes and primers.
| Locus | Primer sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|
| c50541.graph_c0 (CHS) | F:GGAACTCGCTGTTCTGGATAG/R:CCTTGTGGCCCTTAACTTCT |
| c59825.graph_c0 (CHS) | F:GCATGTGTTGTGCGAGTATG/R:CCTTCCCTTCTTCCAGAGATTT |
| c60763.graph_c0 (ANS) | F:CAGCTTGAGTGGGAAGACTATT/R:TACTCGCTTGTTGCCTCTATG |
| c64532.graph_c1 (F3H) | F:GGTTCAAGATTGGCGTGAAATAG/R:CATCAGCTTCCCACTGTACTC |
| c69442.graph_c0 (CHI) | F:TCTTGCTGAGGATGATGACTTT/R:TCTCTAGCTGCACTCCATACT |
| c69862.graph_c1 (UFGT) | F:ACCGCTAATCCCAACTCTTTC/R:GTGGTTCGGTGTGCCTATT |
| c71357.graph_c2 (FLS) | F:CGACAATCGCTCCATCTTCT/R:ATGGCCTCCTTCCTGTATTAAC |
| c72659.graph_c0 (CHS) | F:TTGGTGACGCCGAAGATAAA/R:GAGGTCCAGCTACAGTTCTTG |
| c72737.graph_c0 (CHI) | F:CTCTTGTCCAGCAGCATTCTA/R:CAGAGTTTGGCTGCAAGAATATC |
| c58939.graph_c0(SS3) | F: TGAATGGATGCAGGTGACTGGAAC/R: CCACACTTGCTGAGTTGCTCTTTC |
Notes.
forward primer
reverse primer
Figure 2Quantification cycle(Cq) value of eight candidate reference genes across all the experimentalsamples.
The green line across the box depicts the median. Whiskers represent the local maximum and minimum values, and points beyond the end of each whisker mark the outliers. The box indicates the 25% and 75% percentiles.
Figure 3Expression stablility analysis of reference genes by NormFinder (A), geNorm (B), BestKeeper (C) and ReFinder (D).
Analysis was performed after pooling Cq data across all three growth conditions. The designation of the analyses were perfomed on all eight candidate reference genes. Gene were ranked from the least stable (on the left) to the most stable (on the right). (A) Genes were ranked according to their NormFinder SV value. (B) Genes were ranked according to their geNorm M value. (C) Genes were ranked according to their BestKeeper SD value. (D) Genes were ranked according to their ReFinder Ranking value.
Figure 4The suitability of reference gene.
(A–I) Genes related to the anthocyanin synthesis pathway were chosen as target genes. Those genes were normalized to UBC23 and GAPDH2, respectively. Error bars represent standard deviation from theree independent biological replicates. “G”, “T” and “R” mean green stage, turning stage and red stage in fruit, respectively.