Literature DB >> 32095281

Gender Differences and Obesity Influence on Pulmonary Function Parameters.

Mahmood Dhahir Al-Mendalawi1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32095281      PMCID: PMC7026805          DOI: 10.5001/omj.2020.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oman Med J        ISSN: 1999-768X


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor,

It was with great interest that I read the study by Zakaria et al. published in the January 2019 issue of the Oman Medical Journal.[1] The authors studied the gender differences in pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters and examined the relationship between the body mass index (BMI) and PFT parameters in a Malaysian cohort.[1] Using spirometry, they found that female patients exhibited lower mean values for all PFT parameters compared to male patients. The forced vital capacity (FVC) predicted was less than 80% for all patients, while the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/FVC was higher with increased BMI. BMI was positively correlated with peak expiratory flow in all patients, and with FEV1/FVC ratio in males but not in females.[1] The authors ultimately concluded that males had higher mean values of PFT parameters than females, and the higher BMI seemed to be associated with a restrictive pattern on spirometry.[1] I presume that these results ought to be taken cautiously due to the presence of the following methodological limitation. It is worthy of mentioning that the evaluation of PFT in a given population is usually accomplished by examining the absolute values of various PFT parameters, comparing them with the predicted values, and examining the shape of the curves. Such a precise interpretation of PFT necessitates the employment of population-specific reference values (RV). It is explicit that the normal lung function tends to be controlled by genetic, physiological, nutritional, environmental, psychological, socioeconomic, and ethnic determinants.[2] Accordingly, many population-specific RV of PFT have been constructed to be employed in the clinical settings and researches.[3,4] The authors mentioned in the study methodology that "spirometry was performed to measure pulmonary function by experienced laboratory technicians using automated testing equipment (Cosmed Pony FX Desktop Spirometer, USA) according to recommended standards by the American Thoracic Society".[1] However, they did not mention exactly which RV they employed in their study. To the best of my knowledge, Malaysian population-specific prediction equations for RV of PFT have been already constructed.[5] I presume that if the national RV of PFT were employed in the study[1] more precise results might be yielded.
  5 in total

1.  Spirometry reference values for population aged 7-80 years in China.

Authors:  Jingzhou Zhang; Xiao Hu; Guangliang Shan
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.424

2.  Spirometric studies in Malaysians between 13 and 69 years of age.

Authors:  R Singh; H J Singh; R G Sirisinghe
Journal:  Med J Malaysia       Date:  1993-06

Review 3.  Pulmonary function testing.

Authors:  Gregg L Ruppel; Paul L Enright
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.258

4.  Spirometry reference values in the Brazilian population.

Authors:  R Rufino; C H Costa; A J Lopes; A I Maiworm; K Maynard; L M R A Silva; R M Dias
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Gender Differences and Obesity Influence on Pulmonary Function Parameters.

Authors:  Rahimah Zakaria; Noraini Harif; Badriya Al-Rahbi; Che Badariah Abdul Aziz; Asma Hayati Ahmad
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2019-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.