Literature DB >> 32095208

Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma-associated Genetic Polymorphisms in Northeast Iran.

Ali Yousefian1, Saeed Shokoohi-Rad1, Mohammad Reza Abbaszadegan2, Dorsa Morshedi Rad3, Selma Zargari2, Saman Milanizadeh2, Negar Morovatdar4, Ramin Daneshvar1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of five different polymorphisms from a genome-wide-associated study with susceptibility to glaucoma in the northeast Iranian population.
METHODS: Hundred and thirty patients with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and 130 healthy controls were genotyped for the polymorphic regions with the aid of tetra-amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction. The association of these variants with the disease susceptibility was measured statistically with the logistic regression method.
RESULTS: Hundred and thirty patients with PACG (53 males, 77 females) with a mean age of 64.5 ± 6.2 years and 130 healthy control subjects (51 males, 79 females) with a mean age of 64.0 ± 5.7 years were selected for evaluation. There was a significant association between rs3816415 (P = 0.005), rs736893 (P < 0.001), rs7494379 (P < 0.001), and rs1258267 (P = 0.02) with PACG susceptibility. This association could not be shown for rs3739821.
CONCLUSION: It was revealed that studied variants in GLIS3, EPDR1, FERMT2, and CHAT genes can contribute to the incidence of PACG. Additional studies in other populations are needed to evaluate DPM2-FAM102A.
Copyright © 2020 Yousefian et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma; rs1258267; rs3816415; rs736893; rs7494379; Polymorphism

Year:  2020        PMID: 32095208      PMCID: PMC7001019          DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res        ISSN: 2008-322X


INTRODUCTION

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Approximately 70 million people are affected and it is predicted that by 2020, this number will rise to around 79.6 million globally.[ The incidence of glaucoma varies in different populations and geographic regions. While primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common type, primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) is associated with a more severe presentation and bilateral blindness.[ The visual function in PACG could be saved if early and proper treatments are adopted.[ PACG is characterized by apposition between the peripheral iris and trabecular meshwork, which can ultimately lead to compromised outflow and high intraocular pressure (IOP).[ Stress induced by IOP on optic disc results in compression, deformation, and remodeling of the lamina cribrosa with subsequent mechanical axonal damage and disruption of axonal transport or ischemic damage to the neural tissue.[ PACG is a complex disease influenced by a combination of environmental and genetic risk factors. Recently, COL18A1, which encodes collagen type XVIII, has been identified as a gene that affects angle closure in humans and can lead to PACG.[ An unusually higher incidence among first-degree relatives of affected patients compared with the general population suggests that genetic risk factors may play an important role in the development of PACG.[ Another factor indicating a genetic influence in PACG development is the heritability for narrow-angle and a shallow anterior chamber (two important causes of disease) that are approximately 49% and 93%, respectively.[ Although several genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for PACG revealed multiple genetic variants correlated with disease susceptibility, these results demonstrate that the exact mechanisms by which the culprit gene could cause PACG is not completely understood and the association of different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with glaucoma are still controversial.[ Among different reported variants, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping databases indicate that rs7494379 on chromosome 14 position 53,411,391, gene locus FERMT2, rs736893 on chromosome 9 position 4,217,028, gene locus GLIS3, rs1258267 on chromosome 10 position 50,895,770, gene locus CHAT, rs3816415 on chromosome 7 position 37,988,311, gene locus EPDR1, and rs3739821 on chromosome 9 position 130,702,477, gene locus DPM2-FAM102A are significantly expressed in ocular anterior segment tissues such as iris, ciliary body, and trabecular meshwork,[ which mark them as potential variants for PACG incidence. The current study aimed to evaluate the association of these five SNPs evaluated in GWAS with PACG susceptibility in the northeast of Iran.

Population study

This case-control study was conducted on subjects that were following up for PACG at Khatam Eye Hospital, a referral eye center in Mashhad, northeast of Iran, between 2017 and 2018. The case group included 130 patients with PACG that were diagnosed and followed by a glaucoma-trained ophthalmologist according to optic nerve exam, gonioscopy, IOP, and visual field changes and completed the interview of competency (53 males and 77 females). Individuals with primary angle closure and primary angle closure suspect (with only obstructed angle and/or increased IOP with no obvious optic nerve cupping or visual field defect) were not selected for the study and only patients with established optic nerve, head damage, or glaucomatous perimetric changes due to PACG were considered for evaluation. Control subjects were 130 healthy individuals (51 males and 79 females)[ without any glaucoma findings or signs of angle closure in gonioscopy. Clinical information including age and sex was gathered. The Ethics Committee of the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences approved the study.

SNP selection criteria

The analyzed polymorphisms were selected on the basis of recent GWAS analysis and the databases prepared on the National Center for Biotechnology Information SNP Database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/) (Access date: Dec 20, 2018) and literature searches. We selected five validated SNPs with a minor allele frequency 1%.[

Genotyping

DNA was extracted from the whole blood using the standard salting-out method which was previously described by Miller et al.[ Genotyping was carried out by tetra-amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (tetra-ARMS PCR). For amplification of the sequences containing polymorphic site, compatible and specified primers were designed using GeneRunner v3.01 (http://generunner.net/) and NCBI BLAST was used (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) for ensuring the specificity. Properties of designed primers are listed in Table 1. Tetra-ARMS primer details. Characteristics of the study groups Genotype frequencies Genotype frequencies in male and female groups PCR reaction was performed in a final volume of 15 l consisting 100 ng genomic DNA, 8 l of PCR master mix (Ampliqon A/S, Stenhuggervej 22, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark), 0.5 M of inner primers, and 0.25 M of outer primers. Amplified products were visualized by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. To confirm the results, 10% of samples were randomly re-genotyped by direct sequencing on ABI3130xl genetic analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and the results were reproducible, with no discrepancy.

Statistical analysis

Chi-square test was used for determining the statistical significance of non-association between different variables. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between polymorphism variants and the risk of PACG in different genders. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were adjusted. Reported P-values were two-sided and the significance level was considered 0.05. The SPSS, version 23.0 program (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

This study included 130 patients with PACG (mean age: 64.5 6.2 years) and 130 healthy control subjects (mean age: 64.0 5.7 years). Age and sex of the participants were comparable between the two groups (P 0.05). Detailed properties of the study subjects are demonstrated in Table 2. The tetra-ARMS PCR method was successfully applied to genotype five different SNPs. The association of genotypes and allelic frequencies of five polymorphisms with PACG was determined. Genotype frequencies of all tested polymorphisms were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Genotype frequencies of analyzed SNPs are demonstrated in Table 3. As evident in Table 3, a highly significant association and perhaps predisposing effect was found for G/A genotype of rs736893 in the GLIS3 gene and T/T genotype of rs7494379 in the FERMT2 gene (P 0.001). Statistically meaningful association of rs1258267 in the CHAT gene and rs3816415 in the EPDR1 gene with PACG was also confirmed, but rs3739821 in the DPM2-FAM102A genes did not have any significant association with PACG frequency in our study population. The correlation of rs736893, rs1258267, and rs7494379 with the disease was stronger in males than in females, and rs3816415 had more association with the disease in females [Table 4]. Overall, a highly significant (P 0.001) predisposing effect for the C/T genotype of rs3816415 in the EPDR1 gene and G/A genotype of rs736893 in the GLIS3 was observed [Table 3]. Genotype frequency analysis revealed that heterozygote genotype in rs736893, A/A genotype in rs1258267, C/C genotype in rs3816415, and heterozygote genotype in rs3739821 were more frequent. However, genotype distribution in rs7494379 was not consistent and C/C genotype and C/T genotype were more frequent in cases and controls, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The results of the present study reveal significant differences in the frequencies of genotypes of EPDR1, GLIS3, CHAT, and FERMT2 polymorphisms between PACG patients and controls. The significantly higher frequencies of genotype G/A of GLIS3 and C/T of EPDR1 in patients with PACG than those in the controls indicated that these genotypes may be associated with a susceptibility to this disease. Previous studies showed controversial results on the association of PACG with genetic variants investigated in the current study. Zhuang et al found that only SNPs rs3753841 in COL11A1, rs1258267 in CHAT, and rs736893 in GLIS3 are associated with PACG in northern Chinese people; however, other studies demonstrated EPDR1, GLIS3, CHAT, FERMT2, and DPM2-FAM102A polymorphisms contribution to the disease susceptibility.[ FERMT2 encodes a protein called pleckstrin-homology-domain-containing family C member 1 (PLEKHC1), a component of the extracellular matrix, and could thus have a role in cell adhesion; cell–cell adhesion has been proposed as an important process in the pathogenesis of PACG.[ GLIS3 is a member of the GLI-similar subfamily of Krüppel-like zinc-finger proteins.[ Earlier studies have shown that mutations in GLIS3 cause neonatal diabetes and congenital hypothyroidism.[ SNP markers mapping close to GLIS3 have been observed to be significantly associated with type 1 diabetes in Europeans (rs7020673),[ type 2 diabetes in East Asians (rs7041847),[ and fasting plasma glucose levels in a large meta-analysis of European collections (rs7034200);[ however, metabolic pathways through which zinc-finger activation could contribute to pathogenesis of PACG is not well understood.[ CHAT on chromosome 10 encodes choline acetyltransferase, an enzyme responsible for the synthesis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, which has a role in pupillary constriction. Anticholinergic medications can precipitate acute PACG through pupillary dilatation mechanisms and subsequent pupillary block. Therefore, it is plausible that natural genetic variation in a gene influencing acetylcholine metabolism could alter the risk for PACG.[ EPDR1 encodes a glycosylated type II transmembrane protein known as ependymin-related 1. It potentially has a role in cell adhesion, and it has some similarity to protocadherins and ependymins.[ As mentioned earlier, disturbance in cell–cell adhesion could have some roles in the pathogenesis of PACG.[ SNP rs3739821 is located in an intergenic region between DPM2 and FAM102A, a gene yet to be fully characterized. Mutations in DPM2 have been linked to congenital defects in glycosylation,[ leading to severe pathological neurological phenotypes. Although not much is known about FAM102A, except that its expression is sensitive to the addition of -estradiol, the nearby PIP5KL1 gene has been reported to be involved in cell proliferation[ and potentially in tumorigenesis. Expression analysis revealed that all three genes (FAM102A, DPM2, and PIP5KL1) were expressed in all eye tissues tested, thus providing biological support for their potential role in PACG development.[ The expression of all these genes in the cornea, lens, retina, choroid, and optic nerve head confirms the function of these genes in these tissues.[ The activity of these genes products in the ocular system can explain how different variations in these genes may contribute to the PACG. In conclusion, characterizations of these variations suggest that they can contribute to PACG susceptibility; however, the penetrance of the alleles may be low. Being able to divide the population into risk categories would allow tailored screening, prognosis, and treatment programs according to the risk of each individual. Additional studies in other populations with more participants should be considered to evaluate the association of DPM2-FAM102A with the disease.

Financial Support and Sponsorship

The authors would like to thank the Vice Chancellor of Research, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashahd, Iran (Grant # 950495).

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
Table 1

Tetra-ARMS primer details.


SNP Sequence Product length (nucleotide) Tm (degree centigrade)
rs736893 forward 5'TGCTACCAGGACTTGTGGTTGTG3'24057
reverse 5'CTATGTTCTTCCCAGCACACATTC3'
forward 5'ACAATAGCCTAAGAGCACAGAGG3'130
reverse 5'GGAACCATGACTCTTGGATTTAAA3'
rs1258267 forward 5'GAGGAAGGCTCATTGCGATGG3'32761
reverse 5'TCCTGACTCAAATCTCCTGCCTTC3'
forward 5'TGAGATTCTGATGAGCAAGTGCATG3'130
reverse 5'CCAGGTTGCCTGCACCTGCT3'
rs3816415 forward 5'TGGTGGCTTGGTCAATCTG3'21657
reverse 5'TCATGTGCCTAGTGTTTATAAACA3'
forward 5'ATTACTAGCTAGGCAATCACTTTAC3'96
reverse 5'ATGCTCGGTCTGACCTGTG3'
rs3739821 forward 5'AGAAGATCGTTACCTGCCAGCC3'21561
reverse 5'GGGAACACACTCACACCTCGTG3'
forward 5'CGAGTGTGCAGCCTGACCAGT3'145
reverse 5'AGTGACTTGCCTGTCCCAGAGAG3'
rs7494379 forward 5'GCACCATTCCACCAAATAAGCAC3'28660
reverse 5'CTTAACGTGATCATTAAGTATGGTATTCA3'
forward 5'TCCACTTCTGTGAGATGCAATGTAC3'155
reverse 5'CATTTATGTTGGAGTTGCATGTTAGG3'
SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism
Table 2

Characteristics of the study groups


Study Groups PACG patients Control Group P -value
Number of Subjects 130130
Gender 0.450
Male, n (%) 53(40.8)51(39.2)
Female, n (%) 77(59.2)79(60.8)
Age (years)
Mean (SD) 64.5(6.2)64.0(5.7)0.657
n, number; PACG, primary angle closure glaucoma; SD, standard deviation
Table 3

Genotype frequencies


Genotypes Snps PACG patients N (%) Controls N (%) OR (95%CI) P-value
rs736893 < 0.001
G/G10(7.6)46(35.3)ReferenceReference
G/A120(92.4)84(64.7)6.77(3.2–14.2) < 0.001
A/A00
rs1258267 0.02
A/A97(74.6)113(86.9)ReferenceReference
A/G30(23)17(13.1)2(1–3.9)0.033
G/G3(2.4)01.5(1.3–1.7)0.078
rs3816415 0.005
C/C120(92.3)129(99.2)ReferenceReference
C/T10(7.7)1(0.8)10.75(1.3-85.4)0.025
T/T00
rs3739821 0.42
T/T28(21.5)23(17.6)ReferenceReference
T/C79(60.7)76(58.4)1.69(0.7–3.7)0.18
C/C23(17.8)31(24)1.46(0.7–2.7)0.23
rs7494379 < 0.001
C/C48(36.9)80(61.5)ReferenceReference
C/T50(38.4)37(28.4)2.28(1.3-3.9)0.004
T/T32(24.7)13(10.1)4.08(1.9-8.5) < 0.001
Table 4

Genotype frequencies in male and female groups


Genotypes Gender PACG patients N (%) Controls N (%) OR (95%CI) P-value
rs736893 <0.001
G/G Male5(9)19(37)ReferenceReference
G/A 48(91)32(63)5(1.5–16.5)0.007
A/A 0(0)0(0)
G/G Female5(7)27(34)ReferenceReference
G/A 72(93)52(66)7(2.5–22.2)0.01
A/A 0(0)0(0)
rs1258267 0.02
A/A Male39(74)43(84)ReferenceReference
A/G 12(22)8(16)2.7(0.8–9.2)0.1
G/G 2(4)0(0)10(0.1–11.1)0.98
A/A Female58(75)70(89)ReferenceReference
A/G 18(23)9(11)1.5(0.6–4)0.3
G/G 1(2)0(0)11(0.6–27.4)0.8
rs3816415 0.005
C/C Male47(89)51(11)ReferenceReference
C/T 6(11)0(0)18(0.2–23.4)0.98
T/T 0(0)0(0)
C/C Female73(95)78(99)ReferenceReference
C/T 4(5)1(1)3.6(0.3–25.4)0.2
T/T 0(0)0(0)
rs3739821 0.42
T/T Male12(23)5(10)ReferenceReference
T/C 28(53)31(61)0.4(0.1–1.5)0.19
C/C 13(24)15(29)0.3(0.1–1.3)0.11
T/T Female16(21)18(23)ReferenceReference
T/C 15(66)45(57)1(0.4–2.6)0.83
C/C 10(13)16(20)0.7(0.2–2.4)0.66
rs7494379 < 0.001
C/C Male16(31)32(63)ReferenceReference
C/T 22(41)14(27)2.6(0.9–7.4)0.063
T/T 15(75)5(10)8.4(2.2–32.1)0.002
C/C Female32(42)48(61)ReferenceReference
C/T 28(36)23(29)1.6(0.7–3.5)0.2
T/T 17(22)7(10)3(1–8.8)0.04
  28 in total

Review 1.  The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: a new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP-related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damage.

Authors:  Claude F Burgoyne; J Crawford Downs; Anthony J Bellezza; J-K Francis Suh; Richard T Hart
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Mutations in GLIS3 are responsible for a rare syndrome with neonatal diabetes mellitus and congenital hypothyroidism.

Authors:  Valérie Senée; Claude Chelala; Sabine Duchatelet; Daorong Feng; Hervé Blanc; Jack-Christophe Cossec; Céline Charon; Marc Nicolino; Pascal Boileau; Douglas R Cavener; Pierre Bougnères; Doris Taha; Cécile Julier
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-05-21       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. II. The site of injury and susceptibility to damage.

Authors:  H A Quigley; E M Addicks; W R Green; A E Maumenee
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-04

4.  Prevalence of angle closure in siblings of patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Shahin Yazdani; Shadi Akbarian; Mohammad Pakravan; Mohsen Afrouzifar
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  COL18A1 is a candidate eye iridocorneal angle-closure gene in humans.

Authors:  Fatemeh Suri; Shahin Yazdani; Marjan Chapi; Iman Safari; Paniz Rasooli; Narsis Daftarian; Mohammad Reza Jafarinasab; Saghar Ghasemi Firouzabadi; Elham Alehabib; Hossein Darvish; Brandy Klotzle; Jian-Bing Fan; Casey Turk; Elahe Elahi
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yih-Chung Tham; Xiang Li; Tien Y Wong; Harry A Quigley; Tin Aung; Ching-Yu Cheng
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies eight new loci for type 2 diabetes in east Asians.

Authors:  Yoon Shin Cho; Chien-Hsiun Chen; Cheng Hu; Jirong Long; Rick Twee Hee Ong; Xueling Sim; Fumihiko Takeuchi; Ying Wu; Min Jin Go; Toshimasa Yamauchi; Yi-Cheng Chang; Soo Heon Kwak; Ronald C W Ma; Ken Yamamoto; Linda S Adair; Tin Aung; Qiuyin Cai; Li-Ching Chang; Yuan-Tsong Chen; Yutang Gao; Frank B Hu; Hyung-Lae Kim; Sangsoo Kim; Young Jin Kim; Jeannette Jen-Mai Lee; Nanette R Lee; Yun Li; Jian Jun Liu; Wei Lu; Jiro Nakamura; Eitaro Nakashima; Daniel Peng-Keat Ng; Wan Ting Tay; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Tien Yin Wong; Mitsuhiro Yokota; Wei Zheng; Rong Zhang; Congrong Wang; Wing Yee So; Keizo Ohnaka; Hiroshi Ikegami; Kazuo Hara; Young Min Cho; Nam H Cho; Tien-Jyun Chang; Yuqian Bao; Åsa K Hedman; Andrew P Morris; Mark I McCarthy; Ryoichi Takayanagi; Kyong Soo Park; Weiping Jia; Lee-Ming Chuang; Juliana C N Chan; Shiro Maeda; Takashi Kadowaki; Jong-Young Lee; Jer-Yuarn Wu; Yik Ying Teo; E Shyong Tai; Xiao Ou Shu; Karen L Mohlke; Norihiro Kato; Bok-Ghee Han; Mark Seielstad
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  COL11A1 Polymorphisms Are Associated with Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Severity.

Authors:  Yani Wan; Shengjie Li; Yanting Gao; Li Tang; Wenjun Cao; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-27       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations.

Authors:  Harm-Jan Westra; Marjolein J Peters; Tõnu Esko; Hanieh Yaghootkar; Claudia Schurmann; Johannes Kettunen; Mark W Christiansen; Bruce M Psaty; Samuli Ripatti; Alexander Teumer; Timothy M Frayling; Andres Metspalu; Joyce B J van Meurs; Lude Franke; Benjamin P Fairfax; Katharina Schramm; Joseph E Powell; Alexandra Zhernakova; Daria V Zhernakova; Jan H Veldink; Leonard H Van den Berg; Juha Karjalainen; Sebo Withoff; André G Uitterlinden; Albert Hofman; Fernando Rivadeneira; Peter A C 't Hoen; Eva Reinmaa; Krista Fischer; Mari Nelis; Lili Milani; David Melzer; Luigi Ferrucci; Andrew B Singleton; Dena G Hernandez; Michael A Nalls; Georg Homuth; Matthias Nauck; Dörte Radke; Uwe Völker; Markus Perola; Veikko Salomaa; Jennifer Brody; Astrid Suchy-Dicey; Sina A Gharib; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Thomas Lumley; Grant W Montgomery; Seiko Makino; Holger Prokisch; Christian Herder; Michael Roden; Harald Grallert; Thomas Meitinger; Konstantin Strauch; Yang Li; Ritsert C Jansen; Peter M Visscher; Julian C Knight
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk.

Authors:  Josée Dupuis; Claudia Langenberg; Inga Prokopenko; Richa Saxena; Nicole Soranzo; Anne U Jackson; Eleanor Wheeler; Nicole L Glazer; Nabila Bouatia-Naji; Anna L Gloyn; Cecilia M Lindgren; Reedik Mägi; Andrew P Morris; Joshua Randall; Toby Johnson; Paul Elliott; Denis Rybin; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir; Peter Henneman; Harald Grallert; Abbas Dehghan; Jouke Jan Hottenga; Christopher S Franklin; Pau Navarro; Kijoung Song; Anuj Goel; John R B Perry; Josephine M Egan; Taina Lajunen; Niels Grarup; Thomas Sparsø; Alex Doney; Benjamin F Voight; Heather M Stringham; Man Li; Stavroula Kanoni; Peter Shrader; Christine Cavalcanti-Proença; Meena Kumari; Lu Qi; Nicholas J Timpson; Christian Gieger; Carina Zabena; Ghislain Rocheleau; Erik Ingelsson; Ping An; Jeffrey O'Connell; Jian'an Luan; Amanda Elliott; Steven A McCarroll; Felicity Payne; Rosa Maria Roccasecca; François Pattou; Praveen Sethupathy; Kristin Ardlie; Yavuz Ariyurek; Beverley Balkau; Philip Barter; John P Beilby; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Rafn Benediktsson; Amanda J Bennett; Sven Bergmann; Murielle Bochud; Eric Boerwinkle; Amélie Bonnefond; Lori L Bonnycastle; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Yvonne Böttcher; Eric Brunner; Suzannah J Bumpstead; Guillaume Charpentier; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Peter Chines; Robert Clarke; Lachlan J M Coin; Matthew N Cooper; Marilyn Cornelis; Gabe Crawford; Laura Crisponi; Ian N M Day; Eco J C de Geus; Jerome Delplanque; Christian Dina; Michael R Erdos; Annette C Fedson; Antje Fischer-Rosinsky; Nita G Forouhi; Caroline S Fox; Rune Frants; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Pilar Galan; Mark O Goodarzi; Jürgen Graessler; Christopher J Groves; Scott Grundy; Rhian Gwilliam; Ulf Gyllensten; Samy Hadjadj; Göran Hallmans; Naomi Hammond; Xijing Han; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Neelam Hassanali; Caroline Hayward; Simon C Heath; Serge Hercberg; Christian Herder; Andrew A Hicks; David R Hillman; Aroon D Hingorani; Albert Hofman; Jennie Hui; Joe Hung; Bo Isomaa; Paul R V Johnson; Torben Jørgensen; Antti Jula; Marika Kaakinen; Jaakko Kaprio; Y Antero Kesaniemi; Mika Kivimaki; Beatrice Knight; Seppo Koskinen; Peter Kovacs; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik; G Mark Lathrop; Debbie A Lawlor; Olivier Le Bacquer; Cécile Lecoeur; Yun Li; Valeriya Lyssenko; Robert Mahley; Massimo Mangino; Alisa K Manning; María Teresa Martínez-Larrad; Jarred B McAteer; Laura J McCulloch; Ruth McPherson; Christa Meisinger; David Melzer; David Meyre; Braxton D Mitchell; Mario A Morken; Sutapa Mukherjee; Silvia Naitza; Narisu Narisu; Matthew J Neville; Ben A Oostra; Marco Orrù; Ruth Pakyz; Colin N A Palmer; Giuseppe Paolisso; Cristian Pattaro; Daniel Pearson; John F Peden; Nancy L Pedersen; Markus Perola; Andreas F H Pfeiffer; Irene Pichler; Ozren Polasek; Danielle Posthuma; Simon C Potter; Anneli Pouta; Michael A Province; Bruce M Psaty; Wolfgang Rathmann; Nigel W Rayner; Kenneth Rice; Samuli Ripatti; Fernando Rivadeneira; Michael Roden; Olov Rolandsson; Annelli Sandbaek; Manjinder Sandhu; Serena Sanna; Avan Aihie Sayer; Paul Scheet; Laura J Scott; Udo Seedorf; Stephen J Sharp; Beverley Shields; Gunnar Sigurethsson; Eric J G Sijbrands; Angela Silveira; Laila Simpson; Andrew Singleton; Nicholas L Smith; Ulla Sovio; Amy Swift; Holly Syddall; Ann-Christine Syvänen; Toshiko Tanaka; Barbara Thorand; Jean Tichet; Anke Tönjes; Tiinamaija Tuomi; André G Uitterlinden; Ko Willems van Dijk; Mandy van Hoek; Dhiraj Varma; Sophie Visvikis-Siest; Veronique Vitart; Nicole Vogelzangs; Gérard Waeber; Peter J Wagner; Andrew Walley; G Bragi Walters; Kim L Ward; Hugh Watkins; Michael N Weedon; Sarah H Wild; Gonneke Willemsen; Jaqueline C M Witteman; John W G Yarnell; Eleftheria Zeggini; Diana Zelenika; Björn Zethelius; Guangju Zhai; Jing Hua Zhao; M Carola Zillikens; Ingrid B Borecki; Ruth J F Loos; Pierre Meneton; Patrik K E Magnusson; David M Nathan; Gordon H Williams; Andrew T Hattersley; Kaisa Silander; Veikko Salomaa; George Davey Smith; Stefan R Bornstein; Peter Schwarz; Joachim Spranger; Fredrik Karpe; Alan R Shuldiner; Cyrus Cooper; George V Dedoussis; Manuel Serrano-Ríos; Andrew D Morris; Lars Lind; Lyle J Palmer; Frank B Hu; Paul W Franks; Shah Ebrahim; Michael Marmot; W H Linda Kao; James S Pankow; Michael J Sampson; Johanna Kuusisto; Markku Laakso; Torben Hansen; Oluf Pedersen; Peter Paul Pramstaller; H Erich Wichmann; Thomas Illig; Igor Rudan; Alan F Wright; Michael Stumvoll; Harry Campbell; James F Wilson; Richard N Bergman; Thomas A Buchanan; Francis S Collins; Karen L Mohlke; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Timo T Valle; David Altshuler; Jerome I Rotter; David S Siscovick; Brenda W J H Penninx; Dorret I Boomsma; Panos Deloukas; Timothy D Spector; Timothy M Frayling; Luigi Ferrucci; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson; Cornelia M van Duijn; Yurii S Aulchenko; Antonio Cao; Angelo Scuteri; David Schlessinger; Manuela Uda; Aimo Ruokonen; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Dawn M Waterworth; Peter Vollenweider; Leena Peltonen; Vincent Mooser; Goncalo R Abecasis; Nicholas J Wareham; Robert Sladek; Philippe Froguel; Richard M Watanabe; James B Meigs; Leif Groop; Michael Boehnke; Mark I McCarthy; Jose C Florez; Inês Barroso
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-01-17       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Updates on Genes and Genetic Mechanisms Implicated in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma.

Authors:  Altaf A Kondkar
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2021-03-09

Review 2.  Molecular Genetics of Glaucoma: Subtype and Ethnicity Considerations.

Authors:  Ryan Zukerman; Alon Harris; Alice Verticchio Vercellin; Brent Siesky; Louis R Pasquale; Thomas A Ciulla
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.096

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.