| Literature DB >> 32094402 |
Xiangli Zhang1, Ting Wang1, Jiefei Ji1, Huanjie Wang1, Xinghao Zhu1, Pengfei Du1, Yao Zhu1, Yanqun Huang2, Wen Chen1.
Abstract
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number reflects the abundance of mitochondria in cells and is dependent on the energy requirements of tissues. We hypothesized that the mtDNA copy number in poultry may change with age and tissue, and feed restriction may affect the growth and health of poultry by changing mtDNA content in a tissue-specific pattern. TaqMan real-time PCR was used to quantify mtDNA copy number using three different segments of the mitochondrial genome (D-loop, ATP6, and ND6) relative to the nuclear single-copy preproglucagon gene (GCG). The effect of sex, age, and dietary restriction (quantitative, energy, and protein restriction) on mtDNA copy number variation in the tissues of broilers was investigated. We found that mtDNA copy number varied among tissues (P < 0.01) and presented a distinct change in spatiotemporal pattern. After hatching, the number of mtDNA copies significantly decreased with age in the liver and increased in muscle tissues, including heart, pectoralis, and leg muscles. Newborn broilers (unfed) and embryos (E 11 and E 17) had similar mtDNA contents in muscle tissues. Among 42 d broilers, females had a higher mtDNA copy number than males in the tissues examined. Feed restriction (8-21 d) significantly reduced the body weight but did not significantly change the mtDNA copy number of 21 d broilers. After three weeks of compensatory growth (22-42 d), only the body weight of broilers with a quantitatively restricted diet remained significantly lower than that of broilers in the control group (P < 0.05), while any type of early feed restriction significantly reduced the mtDNA copy number in muscle tissues of 42 d broilers. In summary, the mtDNA copy number of broilers was regulated in a tissue- and age-specific manner. A similar pattern of spatiotemporal change in response to early feed restriction was found in the mtDNA content of muscle tissues, including cardiac and skeletal muscle, whereas liver mtDNA content changed differently with age and dietary restriction. It seems that early restrictions in feed could effectively lower the mtDNA content in muscle cells to reduce the tissue overload in broilers at 42 d to some degree.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32094402 PMCID: PMC7039872 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60123-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Variation in mtDNA copy number in various tissues of 21 d broilers. mt/nucDNA = mtDNA relative to nuclear DNA (GCG) copy number. Different letters indicate P < 0.05, and the same or no letter indicates P > 0.05. n = 3.
Figure 2Change in mtDNA copy number with age in different tissues from broilers. (A) Heart; (B) liver; (C) pectoralis; (D) leg muscle. mt/nucDNA= mtDNA relative to nuclear DNA (GCG) copy number. Different letters indicate P < 0.05, and the same or no letter indicates P > 0.05. n = 3.
Figure 3Variation in mtDNA copy number among tissues from broilers of different ages. (A) E11; (B) E17; (C) 1 d; (D) 21 d; (E) 42 d; (F) 60 d. mt/nucDNA = mtDNA relative to nuclear DNA (GCG) copy number. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), and the same or no letter indicates P > 0.05. n = 3.
Figure 4MtDNA copy number of male and female broilers. mt/nucDNA= mtDNA relative to nuclear DNA (GCG) copy number. The P values for sex and tissue determined by two-way ANOVA are presented in the figure. Comparisons between sexes in certain tissues were based on one-way ANOVA. **Indicates P ≤ 0.01, and no * indicates P > 0.01. Abbreviations: F, female; M, male. n = 3.
Effects of feed restriction on the body weight and tissue weight of broilers (unit: g).
| Age | Groupa | Body weightb | Heart weightc | Liver weightc | Pectoralis weightc | Leg muscle weightc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 d | Control | 824.13 ± 11.55a | 5.37 ± 0.21ab | 20.93 ± 0.63b | 147.23 ± 4.40a | 102.28 ± 3.84a |
| QR | 474.13 ± 6.80d | 2.81 ± 0.05c | 11.49 ± 0.45d | 65.31 ± 2.21c | 57.80 ± 1.74b | |
| ER | 730.50 ± 685c | 4.69 ± 0.24ab | 16.56 ± 0.88c | 131.85 ± 4.18b | 92.37 ± 3.04a | |
| PR | 789.13 ± 7.16b | 7.20 ± 1.30a | 25.03 ± 2.19a | 138.10 ± 4.91ab | 100.07 ± 4.15a | |
| 42 d | Control | 2519.25 ± 67.27a | 9.54 ± 0.67 | 49.51 ± 3.70 | 525.60 ± 2.86 | 384.45 ± 14.62 |
| QR | 2318.50 ± 69.38b | 9.75 ± 0.63 | 44.30 ± 2.59 | 455.37 ± 16.00 | 357.22 ± 13.43 | |
| ER | 2371.75 ± 53.29ab | 8.99 ± 0.88 | 42.94 ± 2.02 | 492.85 ± 29.07 | 356.35 ± 15.41 | |
| PR | 2341.12 ± 56.45ab | 10.24 ± 0.48 | 49.00 ± 1.82 | 502.62 ± 25.59 | 362.90 ± 13.57 |
Note: a-ddifferent lowercase letters in different groups of the same age indicate P < 0.05.
aIn 8–21 d, the control group was fed a conventional diet ad libitum, the QR group was fed a conventional diet between 8:00–13:00, the ER group was fed a 15% energy-restricted diet, and the PR group was fed a 15% protein-limited diet. At 22–42 d, the four groups of broilers were transferred to the same conventional diet ad libitum.
bBody weight refers to the average live weight of each group of broilers (n = 20).
cTissue weight refers to the tissue weight of the slaughtered broilers (n = 3).
Figure 5Effects of feed restriction on the mtDNA copy number of 21 d broilers in different tissues. (A) Heart; (B) liver; (C) pectoralis; (D) leg muscle. P group = 0.229; mt/nucDNA= mtDNA relative to nuclear DNA (GCG) copy number. P group × tissue = 0.453. The control group was fed a conventional diet ad libitum, the QR group was fed a conventional diet between 8:00–13:00 from 8–21 d, the ER group was fed a 15% energy-restricted diet ad libitum from 8–21 d, and the PR group was fed a 15% protein-limited diet ad libitum from 8–21 d. n = 3.
Figure 6Effects of feed restriction on the mtDNA copy number of 42 d broilers in different tissues. (A) Heart; (B) liver; (C) pectoralis; (D) leg muscle. mt/nucDNA= mtDNA relative to nuclear DNA (GCG) copy number. P group = 0.002; P group × tissue = 0.472. Different letters indicate P < 0.05, and the same or no letter indicates P > 0.05. The control group was fed a conventional diet ad libitum, the QR group was fed a conventional diet between 8:00–13:00 from 8–21 d, the ER group was fed a 15% energy-restricted diet ad libitum from 8–21 d, and the PR group was fed a 15% protein limited diet ad libitum from 8–21 d. n = 3.
The primers and probes used for qPCR.
| Gene Name | Primer and Probe Sequence (5′ to 3′) | Amplicon Size (bp) | Annealing Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
F: 5′ACCCCTGCCTGTAATGTACTTC3′ R: 5′CACGGACTAAAGAGGGGAAGAT3′ Probe: 5′TTCTTTCCCCCTACACCCCTCGCCCT3′ | 183 | 60 | |
F: 5′ATTCTCAAGCCCCTGCCTAC3′ R: 5′TCAGAGTTGGATGGTGGAGAGG3′ Probe: 5′CCTCCCATCACTCCTTCTTCCAGCCCTC3′ | 124 | 60 | |
F: 5′TAACAACAAACCTCACCCAGCC3′ R: 5′GTGTGTCTTTTGCTCGGTTGGA3′ Probe: 5′AGCCACCAAAAACAACCCAACCCCAC3′ | 95 | 60 | |
F: 5′GTGGAGGGCTGATAAAACACAAT3′ R: 5′TCCAACTCCTTGACCTCTATCC3′ Probe: 5′TTCAGCCCTCAGCATTCAGTCCCATT3′ | 205 | 60 |