Literature DB >> 32094127

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes between Analysis Populations in the RESTORE-IMI 1 Phase 3 Trial of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam versus Colistin plus Imipenem-Cilastatin in Patients with Imipenem-Nonsusceptible Bacterial Infections.

Keith S Kaye1, Helen W Boucher2, Michelle L Brown3, Angela Aggrey3, Ireen Khan3, Hee-Koung Joeng3, Robert W Tipping3, Jiejun Du3, Katherine Young3, Joan R Butterton3, Amanda Paschke4.   

Abstract

The RESTORE-IMI 1 phase 3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of imipenem-cilastatin (IMI) combined with relebactam (REL) for treating imipenem-nonsusceptible infections. The objective of this analysis was to compare the outcomes among patients meeting eligibility requirements based on central laboratory susceptibility versus local laboratory susceptibility. Patients with serious infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible, colistin-susceptible, and imipenem-REL-susceptible pathogens were randomized 2:1 to IMI-REL plus placebo or colistin plus IMI for 5 to 21 days. The primary endpoint was a favorable overall response. Key endpoints included the clinical response and all-cause mortality. We compared outcomes between the primary microbiological modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) population, where eligibility was based on central laboratory susceptibility testing, and the supplemental mMITT (SmMITT) population, where eligibility was based on local, site-level testing. The SmMITT (n = 41) and MITT (n = 31) populations had similar baseline characteristics, including sex, age, illness severity, and renal function. In both analysis populations, favorable overall response rates in the IMI-REL treatment group were >70%. Favorable clinical response rates at day 28 were 71.4% for IMI-REL and 40.0% for colistin plus IMI in the mMITT population, whereas they were 75.0% for IMI-REL and 53.8% for colistin plus IMI in the SmMITT population. Day 28 all-cause mortality rates were 9.5% for IMI-REL and 30.0% for colistin plus IMI in the mMITT population, whereas they were 10.7% for IMI-REL and 23.1% for colistin plus IMI in the SmMITT population. The outcomes in the SmMITT population were generally consistent with those in the mMITT population, suggesting that outcomes may be applicable to the real-world use of IMI-REL for treating infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible Gram-negative pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02452047.).
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbapenem resistant; local microbiology data; supplemental analysis population; β-lactamase inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32094127      PMCID: PMC7179630          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02203-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  28 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of two rates.

Authors:  O Miettinen; M Nurminen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1985 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against problem Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the UK, 2015-16.

Authors:  David M Livermore; Danièle Meunier; Katie L Hopkins; Michel Doumith; Robert Hill; Rachel Pike; Peter Staves; Neil Woodford
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Colistin-associated Acute Kidney Injury in Severely Ill Patients: A Step Toward a Better Renal Care? A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lidia Dalfino; Filomena Puntillo; Maria Josephine Mura Ondok; Adriana Mosca; Rosa Monno; Sara Coppolecchia; Maria Luigia Spada; Francesco Bruno; Nicola Brienza
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  In Vitro Activity of Imipenem-Relebactam against Gram-Negative ESKAPE Pathogens Isolated by Clinical Laboratories in the United States in 2015 (Results from the SMART Global Surveillance Program).

Authors:  Sibylle H Lob; Meredith A Hackel; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Katherine Young; Mary R Motyl; James A Karlowsky; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Incidence of and risk factors for colistin-associated nephrotoxicity in a large academic health system.

Authors:  Jason M Pogue; Jiha Lee; Dror Marchaim; Victoria Yee; Jing J Zhao; Teena Chopra; Paul Lephart; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Activity of imipenem/relebactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with antimicrobial-resistant phenotypes from seven global regions: SMART 2015-2016.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Sibylle H Lob; Katherine Young; Mary R Motyl; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 7.  Clinical epidemiology of the global expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases.

Authors:  L Silvia Munoz-Price; Laurent Poirel; Robert A Bonomo; Mitchell J Schwaber; George L Daikos; Martin Cormican; Giuseppe Cornaglia; Javier Garau; Marek Gniadkowski; Mary K Hayden; Karthikeyan Kumarasamy; David M Livermore; Juan J Maya; Patrice Nordmann; Jean B Patel; David L Paterson; Johann Pitout; Maria Virginia Villegas; Hui Wang; Neil Woodford; John P Quinn
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 25.071

8.  Colistin alone versus colistin plus meropenem for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mical Paul; George L Daikos; Emanuele Durante-Mangoni; Dafna Yahav; Yehuda Carmeli; Yael Dishon Benattar; Anna Skiada; Roberto Andini; Noa Eliakim-Raz; Amir Nutman; Oren Zusman; Anastasia Antoniadou; Pia Clara Pafundi; Amos Adler; Yaakov Dickstein; Ioannis Pavleas; Rosa Zampino; Vered Daitch; Roni Bitterman; Hiba Zayyad; Fidi Koppel; Inbar Levi; Tanya Babich; Lena E Friberg; Johan W Mouton; Ursula Theuretzbacher; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  Activity of MK-7655 combined with imipenem against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  David M Livermore; Marina Warner; Shazad Mushtaq
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  In vitro studies evaluating the activity of imipenem in combination with relebactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Katherine Young; Ronald E Painter; Susan L Raghoobar; Nichelle N Hairston; Fred Racine; Douglas Wisniewski; Carl J Balibar; Artjohn Villafania; Rumin Zhang; Daniel F Sahm; Timothy Blizzard; Nicholas Murgolo; Milton L Hammond; Mary R Motyl
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Imipenem-Relebactam.

Authors:  J Nicholas O'Donnell; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.938

Review 2.  Microbial Resistance Movements: An Overview of Global Public Health Threats Posed by Antimicrobial Resistance, and How Best to Counter.

Authors:  Sameer Dhingra; Nor Azlina A Rahman; Ed Peile; Motiur Rahman; Massimo Sartelli; Mohamed Azmi Hassali; Tariqul Islam; Salequl Islam; Mainul Haque
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-04

Review 3.  Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam: A Review in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Young-A Heo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Infectious disease: how to manage Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogen conundrums with dual beta-lactam therapy.

Authors:  Alireza FakhriRavari; Brenda Simiyu; Taylor Morrisette; Yewande Dayo; Jacinda C Abdul-Mutakabbir
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 5.  Treatment options for K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii co-resistant to carbapenems, aminoglycosides, polymyxins and tigecycline: an approach based on the mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems.

Authors:  Stamatis Karakonstantis; Evangelos I Kritsotakis; Achilleas Gikas
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetics of Non-β-Lactam β-Lactamase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Giacomo Luci; Francesca Mattioli; Marco Falcone; Antonello Di Paolo
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 7.  Antibiotics in the pipeline: a literature review (2017-2020).

Authors:  Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Hisham Momattin; Anfal Y Al-Ali; Khalid Eljaaly; Raghavendra Tirupathi; Mohamed Bilal Haradwala; Swetha Areti; Saad Alhumaid; Ali A Rabaan; Abbas Al Mutair; Patricia Schlagenhauf
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Urgent need for novel antibiotics in Republic of Korea to combat multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Hyo-Jin Lee; Dong-Gun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.884

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.