Hayley Christian1, Francis Mitrou2, Rebecca Cunneen3, Stephen R Zubrick2. 1. School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia; Telethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia; Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia. Electronic address: hayley.christian@telethonkids.org.au. 2. Telethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia; Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia. 3. School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the longitudinal association between pet ownership and children's social-emotional development. STUDY DESIGN: Two time-points of data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children were analyzed for children at ages 5 (n = 4242) and 7 (n = 4431) years. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) measured children's social-emotional development. Pet ownership status and type (dog, cat, other) as well as sociodemographic and other potential confounders were collected. Longitudinal panel regression models were used. RESULTS: Overall, 27% of children had abnormal scores on 1 or more SDQ scales. By age 7, 75% of children had pets with ownership highest in single-child households. Owning any type of pet was associated with decreased odds of abnormal scores for emotional symptoms (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99), peer problems (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84), and prosocial behavior (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.38-0.70), compared with non-pet owners. Dog ownership was associated with decreased odds of abnormal scores on any of the SDQ scales (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93). For children without any siblings, only the prosocial behavior scale was significantly associated with pet ownership (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.66). In longitudinal models, cat-only and dog-only groups were associated with fewer emotional symptoms and peer problems compared with non-pet owners. CONCLUSIONS: Early school age is an important period for family pet acquisition. Pets may protect children from developing social-emotional problems and should be taken into account when assessing child development and school readiness. Children without siblings may benefit most in terms of their prosocial behavior.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the longitudinal association between pet ownership and children's social-emotional development. STUDY DESIGN: Two time-points of data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children were analyzed for children at ages 5 (n = 4242) and 7 (n = 4431) years. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) measured children's social-emotional development. Pet ownership status and type (dog, cat, other) as well as sociodemographic and other potential confounders were collected. Longitudinal panel regression models were used. RESULTS: Overall, 27% of children had abnormal scores on 1 or more SDQ scales. By age 7, 75% of children had pets with ownership highest in single-child households. Owning any type of pet was associated with decreased odds of abnormal scores for emotional symptoms (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99), peer problems (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84), and prosocial behavior (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.38-0.70), compared with non-pet owners. Dog ownership was associated with decreased odds of abnormal scores on any of the SDQ scales (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93). For children without any siblings, only the prosocial behavior scale was significantly associated with pet ownership (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.66). In longitudinal models, cat-only and dog-only groups were associated with fewer emotional symptoms and peer problems compared with non-pet owners. CONCLUSIONS: Early school age is an important period for family pet acquisition. Pets may protect children from developing social-emotional problems and should be taken into account when assessing child development and school readiness. Children without siblings may benefit most in terms of their prosocial behavior.
Authors: Michelle Ng; Elizabeth Wenden; Leanne Lester; Carri Westgarth; Hayley Christian Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Lucía Platero; Paula Garcia-Sanchez; Talía Sainz; Cristina Calvo; Irene Iglesias; Fernando Esperon; Ricardo de la Fuente; Esteban Frauca; Antonio Perez-Martinez; Ana Mendez-Echevarria Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-09-08
Authors: Anne Gadomski; Melissa B Scribani; Nancy Tallman; Nicole Krupa; Paul Jenkins; Lawrence S Wissow Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 2.567