| Literature DB >> 32093440 |
Aida Malek Mahdavi1, Nadereh Rashtchizadeh1, Hadiseh Kavandi1, Mehrzad Hajialilo1, Sousan Kolahi1, Mohammad-Reza Nakhjavani1, Ali-Asghar Ebrahimi1, Seyedmostafa Seyedmardani2, Mansour Salesi3, Mohsen Soroush4, Alireza Khabbazi1.
Abstract
Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the demographic, clinical, angiographic and prognostic characteristics of Takayasu arteritis (TA) in Iran. Materials and methods: A total of 75 patients with TA based on the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for TA classification referred to the Rheumatology Centres, were followed-up from 1989 to 2019. Demographic, clinical, angiographic and prognostic characteristics were collected at baseline and last visit.Entities:
Keywords: Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS); Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS); Takayasu arteritis; Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI); outcome; remission; Iran
Year: 2020 PMID: 32093440 PMCID: PMC7379441 DOI: 10.3906/sag-1910-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Turk J Med Sci ISSN: 1300-0144 Impact factor: 0.973
Demographic characteristics of participants (N = 75).
| Parameters | Number |
|---|---|
| Age at disease onset (years) | 31.9 ± 9.8 (min: 12, max: 66) |
| Time to diagnosis (years) | 4.28 (median 2, min: 0.1, max: 32) |
| Disease duration (years) | 8.58 (median 6.25, min: 0.4, max: 32) |
| Follow-up duration (years) | 5.25 (median 6, min: 0.5, max: 30) |
| Female: Male | 14:1 |
| Family history of TA or other rheumatic diseases | 0 |
| ACR classification criteria |
TA, Takayasu arteritis; ACR, American College of Rheumatology; BP, blood pressure.
Angiographic classification of TA patients at the time of diagnosis and its associations with demographic characteristics and outcome of disease (n = 75).
| Angiographic classification | Number | Age (years) | P- value* | Sex(F:M) | P- value* | Delay diagnosis (years) | P- value* | VDI at the end of follow up | P- value* | ITAS at the diagnosis | P- value* | Remission rate | P- value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type I (%) | 32 (42.7) | 34.59 | 0.05 | 31:1 | 0.278 | 3.49 | 0.740 | 2.1 | 0.436 | 5.5 | 0.178 | 23 (71.9) | 0.668 |
*P values were calculated for angiographic type I versus other types.
Factors associated with delay of >2 years in diagnosis of TA.
| Parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Age at the diagnosis of TA > 30 | 0.26 (0.08–0.86) | 0.028 | 0.34 (0.09–1.23) | 0.100 |
| Female sex | 2.28 (0.22–13.74) | 0.489 | ||
| Clinical manifestations | ||||
| Constitutional symptoms, myalgia, arthralgia, arthritis | 1.47 (0.43–4.99) | 0.557 | ||
| Upper limb claudication or BP discrepancy or pulse discrepancy | 0.72 (0.17–3.10) | 0.659 | ||
| Bruit over subclavian artery | 1.07 (0.33–3.48) | 0.908 | ||
| Bruit over carotid artery | 3.27 (0.95–11.24) | 0.060 | 2.31 (0.59–9.12) | 0.232 |
| CNS symptoms | 2.23 (0.67–7.40) | 0.192 | 1.25 (0.32–4.91) | 0.753 |
| Hypertension | 2.03 (0.64–6.49) | 0.232 | ||
| PAH | 1.05 (0.14–8.13) | 0.965 | ||
| Chest pain, MI and dyspnoea | 2.13 (0.58–7.85) | 0.254 | ||
| High ESR or CRP | 0.95 (0.28–3.24) | 0.938 | ||
| Angiographic type 1 versus others | 0.68 (0.23–1.99) | 0.481 | ||
| Angiographic type 5 versus others | 0.85 (0.63–1.15) | 0.292 | ||
TA, Takayasu arteritis; OR, odds ratio, CI, confidence interval; BP, blood pressure; CNS, central nervous system; PAH, pulmonary artery hypertension; MI, myocardial infarction; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Anatomical distribution and pattern of arterial lesions at the time
| Anatomical distribution | Any lesion | Stenosis | Obstruction | Aneurysm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subclavian artery (%) | 63 (84.0) | 52 (82.5) | 10 (15.9) | 4 (6.3) |
| Carotid artery (%) | 36 (48.0) | 33 (91.7) | 1 (2.8) | 4 (11.1) |
| Aortic arc (%) | 26 (34.7) | 22 (84.6) | 0 | 5 (19.2) |
| Renal artery (%) | 17 (22.7) | 16 (94.1) | 1 (5.9) | 0 |
| Abdominal aorta (%) | 12 (16.0) | 11 (91.7) | 1 (8.3) | 1 (8.3) |
| Brachial artery (%) | 10 (13.3) | 10 (100) | 0 | 1 (1.4) |
| Thoracic aorta (%) | 8 (10.7) | 6 (75.0) | 0 | 4 (50) |
| Vertebral artery (%) | 10 (13.3) | 9 (10.0) | 1 (1.0) | 0 |
| Pulmonary artery (%) | 6 (8.0) | 6 (100) | 0 | 2 (25) |
| Axillary artery (%) | 5 (6.7) | 5 (100) | 1 (20.0) | 0 |
| Ascending aorta (%) | 5 (6.7) | 1 (25.0) | 0 | 4 (75.0) |
| Mesenteric artery (%) | 5 (6.7) | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 |
| Celiac artery (%) | 4 (5.3) | 4 (100) | 0 | 0 |
| Iliac artery (%) | 4 (5.3) | 4 (100) | 0 | 0 |
| Cerebral artery (%) | 4 (5.3) | 4 (100) | 0 | 0 |
| Coronary artery (%) | 1 (1.3) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 0 |
Therapies and outcomes of TA patients (N = 75).
| Parameters | Number |
|---|---|
| Medications | |
| Prednisolone (%) | 66 (88) |
| Methotrexate (%) | 36 (48) |
| Azathioprine (%) | 16 (21.3) |
| Cyclosporine (%) | 2 (2.7) |
| Cyclophosphamide (%) | 5 (6.7) |
| Mycophenolate mofetil (%) | 5 (6.7) |
| Biologics (%) | 9 (12) |
| DMARDs number | |
| Prednisolone dose at the baseline (mg/d) | 34.26 ± 17.9 |
| Prednisolone dose at the end of follow-up (mg/d) | 11.1 ± 4.8 |
| ITAS at the baseline | 5.3 (median = 5.1, min = 0, max = 15) |
| ITAS at the end of follow-up | 1.5 (median = 1, min = 0, max = 5) |
| BVAS at the baseline | 3.8 (median = 3, min = 0, max = 12) |
| BVAS at the end of follow-up | 2.1 (median 3, min = 0, max = 4) |
| VDI at the baseline | 2.5 (median 2, min = 1, max = 4) |
| VDI at the end of follow-up | 2.6 (median 2.5, min = 1, max = 4) |
| Disease course at the end of follow-up | |
| Open surgery (%) | 8 (10.7) |
| Angioplasty (%) | 8 (10.7) |
| Morbidity (%) | 41 (55.4) |
| Job loss (%) | 7 (9.5) |
TA, Takayasu’s arteritis; DMARDs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; BVAS, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score;
Comparison of demographic data, clinical characteristics, angiographic classification, and treatment regimen between TA patients with disease in remission and active disease.
| Parameters | TA in remission(N = 54) | Active TA (N = 21) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at disease presentation (years) | 26.3 ± 9.2 | 32.9 ± 10.7 | 0.042 |
| Female (%) | 48 (88.9) | 18 (85.7) | 0.640 |
| Delay in diagnosis (years) | 4.3 (median = 2) | 1.8 (median = 1.7) | 0.035 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 51.2 (median = 50) | 49.4 (median = 37) | 0.347 |
| Angiographic type 1 versus others | 26 (48.2) | 6 (28.6) | 0.459 |
| Angiographic type 5 versus others | 17 (31.5) | 5 (23.8) | 0.765 |
| Prednisolone dose at the cohort entry (mg/d) | 36.7 (median = 30) | 34.1 (median = 30) | 0.786 |
| Treatment with DMARDs (%) | 32 (59.3) | 12 (57.1) | 0.713 |
| ITAS at the baseline | 5.1 (median = 5) | 5 (median = 5.5) | 0.651 |
| BVAS at the baseline | 1.7 (median = 1) | 5 (median = 4) | 0.026 |
| Surgery or intervention (%) | 10 (18.5) | 3 (14.3) | 0.597 |
TA, Takayasu arteritis; DMARDs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; BVAS, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score; ITAS, Indian Takayasu Activity Score.
Factors associated with remission in TA.
| Parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Age at the diagnosis of TA > 30 | 2.08 (0.49–8.87) | 0.124 | 5.79 (0.68–0.87) | 0.204 |
| Female sex | 0.88 (0.21–7.43) | 0.915 | ||
| Delay in diagnosis >2 years | 2.73 (0.87–9.05) | 0.091 | 1.84 (0.53–10.21) | 0.165 |
| Angiographic type 1 versus others | 1.44 (0.35–5.95) | 0.613 | ||
| Angiographic type 5 versus others | 1.11 (0.98–1.47) | 0.160 | 1.01 (0.98–1.09) | 0.191 |
| Severe activity according NIH criteria at the entry of cohort | 0.47 (0.19–1.13) | 0.092 | 0.34 (0.06–1.19) | 0.067 |
| Prednisolone dose at the entry of cohort > 30 mg/d | 0.71 (0.18–2.73) | 0.613 | ||
| Treatment with DMARDs | 0.86 (0.20–3.64) | 0.834 | ||
TA, Takayasu arteritis; OR, odds ratio, CI, confidence interval; NIH, National Institute of Health; DMARDs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.
Comparison of demographic, clinical and outcome data of TA from literature.
| Study | Number of studied patients | Country | Mean age | Female to male ratio | The mean lag time from symptom onset to diagnosis (months) | Most common involved arteries | Mostcommon angiographic type | Active disease atdiagnosis | Adding DMARDs to treatment regimen | Surgeries and vascular interventions, and outcomes | Sustained remission | Survival rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hata et al. 1996 [4] | 80 | Japan | 37 | 25.7 | - | Carotid, subclavian | Type V (54%) | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hata et al. 1996 [4] | 102 | India | 28 | 1.7 | - | Renal, subclavian | Type V (55%) | - | - | - | - | - |
| Park et al. 2005 [10] | 108 | Korea | 29 | 5.4 | 14 | Subclavian (34%), renal (25%) | Type I (36%) | 84% | 36% | - | 75% | 87.2% at the tenth year |
| Yang et al. 2014 [11] | 556 | China | 29 | 3.8 | 91 | Left subclavian artery (49%), left common carotid artery (31%) | Type III(37.8%) | 23% | 4% | Surgery in 35% | 66% | 94% at the fifth year |
| Li et al. 2017 [12] | 411 | China | 23 | 3.8 | 21 | Subclavian (80%), carotid (79%) | Type V (61%) | - | - | Surgery in 13% and intervention in 11% | - | - |
| Goel et al. 2017 [13] | 251 | India | 29 | 4.6 | 50 | - | Type V (54%) | 5.2% | 94% | Intervention in 72%, surgery in 3% | 46% | 98% at the tenth year |
| Bicakcigil et al. 2009 [14] | 248 | Turkey | 30 | 8.2 | 34 | Subclavian(76%), carotid (52%) | Type V (51%) | 93% | 84% | Surgery or intervention in 26% | 71% | - |
| Karageorgaki et al. 2009 [15] | 42 | Greece | 31 | 7.4 | 24 | Subclavian (97%), carotid (91%) | Type V (70%) | - | 82% | Surgery in 43% and intervention in 21% | 83% (partial in 55% and complete in 28%) | - |
| Vanoli et al. 2005 [16] | 104 | Italy | 29 | 7 | 42 | Subclavian, carotid | - | 54% | - | Surgery in 50% and intervention in 54% | 69% | - |
| Petrovic-Rackov et al. 2009 [17] | 16 | Serbia | 30 | All were female | 24 | Subclavian (88%), carotid (37%) | Type I (50%) | - | 69% | Surgery or intervention in 44%; | 94% | - |
| Gudbrandsson et al. 2016 [18] | 77 | Norway | 32 | 11.5 | 37 | Subclavian, carotid | Type I (47%) | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arnaud et al. 2010 [19] | 82 | France | 33 | 4.8 | - | Carotid, subclavian | Type V (48%) | - | 53% | Surgery or intervention in 49% | - | 100% at 5 years and 95.0% at 10 years |
| Schmidt et al. 2013 [20] | 126 | USA | 29 | 10 | 17.5 | Subclavian (66%), carotid (55%) | Types V (57%) | - | 66% | Surgery or intervention in 55%; with surgical mortality of 3% | 71% | 97% at the tenth year |
| Soto et al. 2007 [21] | 94 | Mexica | 26 | 5.7 | - | Subclavian(65%), carotid (48%) | Type V (69%) | 32% | - | Surgery in 24% and intervention in 7% | - | 73% at the tenth year |
| Sato et al. 1998 [22] | 73 | Brazil | 27 | 5 | - | - | Type V (57%) | 92% | 33% | Surgery or intervention in 11% | - | 93% at the fifth year |
| Present study | 75 | Iran | 32 | 14 | 51 | Subclavian (84%), carotid (46%) | Type I (43%) | 83% | 63% | Surgery in 11% and intervention in 11% | 72% | 90% at the tenth year |
TA, Takayasu’s arteritis; Nasu’s classification of an angiogram in Takayasu arteritis.