| Literature DB >> 32093375 |
Julius O Nyalwidhe1, Agata Jurczyk2, Basanthi Satish3, Sambra Redick2, Natasha Qaisar3, Melanie I Trombly3, Pranitha Vangala4, Riccardo Racicot3, Rita Bortell2, David M Harlan3, Dale L Greiner2, Michael A Brehm2, Jerry L Nadler1,5, Jennifer P Wang3.
Abstract
Enteroviral infections are implicated in islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes (T1D) pathogenesis. Significant β-cell stress and damage occur with viral infection, leading to cells that are dysfunctional and vulnerable to destruction. Human stem cell-derived β (SC-β) cells are insulin-producing cell clusters that closely resemble native β cells. To better understand the events precipitated by enteroviral infection of β cells, we investigated transcriptional and proteomic changes in SC-β cells challenged with coxsackie B virus (CVB). We confirmed infection by demonstrating that viral protein colocalized with insulin-positive SC-β cells by immunostaining. Transcriptome analysis showed a decrease in insulin gene expression following infection, and combined transcriptional and proteomic analysis revealed activation of innate immune pathways, including type I interferon (IFN), IFN-stimulated genes, nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and downstream inflammatory cytokines, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I. Finally, insulin release by CVB4-infected SC-β cells was impaired. These transcriptional, proteomic, and functional findings are in agreement with responses in primary human islets infected with CVB ex vivo. Human SC-β cells may serve as a surrogate for primary human islets in virus-induced diabetes models. Because human SC-β cells are more genetically tractable and accessible than primary islets, they may provide a preferred platform for investigating T1D pathogenesis and developing new treatments.Entities:
Keywords: beta cells; coxsackie B virus; type 1 diabetes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32093375 PMCID: PMC7074978 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8020295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Immunostaining of stem cell-derived β (SC-β) cells revealed abundant insulin (INS)- and glucagon (GCG)-positive cells with viral protein (VP1) predominantly colocalizing with INS. (A) The colocalization of green and red is shown as yellow. Arrows show examples of colocalization between VP1 and INS, and the arrowhead shows colocalization between VP1 and GCG. A representative cell cluster from each condition at 48 h post-infection with coxsackie B virus (CVB)4 (or control uninfected) is shown. INS = green, GCG = white or green, VP1 = red, Hoechst (DNA stain) = blue. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Mander’s overlap coefficients (k1) for VP1 and INS and for VP1 and GCG in infected cells are shown at the indicated time points following infection. VP1 and INS colocalized more frequently than VP1 and GCG. (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, multiple t-test). The coefficient was significantly lower for uninfected controls for which the median value is shown as the horizontal dashed line (p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney test). Each point represents one field of view.
Proteins with >1.5-fold (log2) difference in CVB4-infected compared to uninfected SC-β cells at 24 and 48 h.
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| 7.897847 | 9.588954 | P08292 | |
| 3.013728 | −2.054616 | Q99816 | |
| 3.153537 | −2.260496 | P30519 | |
| 2.616789 | −2.945653 | P43307 | |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.789608 | 9.046398 | P08292 | |
| 3.216631 | 4.741543 | P20591 | |
| 3.350592 | 4.65571 | P12955 | |
| 3.742026 | 3.205037 | Q04941 | |
| 5.440948 | 3.004789 | P62072 | |
| 6.367597 | 2.369012 | P07996 | |
| 4.888743 | 2.081825 | P80162 | |
| 1.863447 | 1.912146 | Q6KCM7 | |
| 3.944867 | 1.822556 | P10145 | |
| 2.789387 | 1.807034 | O95786 | |
| 3.484639 | 1.529275 | P09914 | |
| 2.11946 | 1.525606 | P30480 | |
| 5.962474 | −1.66812 | P22676 | |
| 4.316548 | −1.70801 | P67809 | |
| 3.94315 | −1.72381 | Q13310 | |
| 2.155246 | −1.80032 | P30519 | |
| 2.691352 | −1.98576 | Q9UMX0 | |
| 1.847708 | −2.11509 | Q9UHD9 | |
| 3.702343 | −2.17211 | Q9Y2W2 | |
| 3.326408 | −2.22052 | Q9NX14 | |
| 3.449024 | −2.28579 | P50402 | |
| 2.690032 | −2.39827 | Q9UNH7 | |
| 3.795319 | −2.47833 | Q9H3P7 | |
| 2.292801 | −3.22337 | P43307 | |
Figure 2Ingenuity pathway analysis of SC-β cells infected with CVB4 for 48 h (proteomics). Inflammatory and type I IFN pathways were activated.
Proteomics. Differentially regulated genes in CVB4-infected SC-β cells compared to primary beta cells (results shown are for 72 h post infection).
| Upstream Regulator | Molecule Type | Predicted Activation State | Activation | Target Molecules in Dataset | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFN-α | group | Activated | 2.369 | 3.04E-11 | APOL2, EIF2AK2, GBP1, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, ISG15, PML |
| TLR7 | transmembrane receptor | Activated | 2.433 | 5.28E-09 | ICAM1, IFIT1, IFIT3, ISG15, MX1, STAT1 |
| PRL | cytokine | Activated | 2.236 | 1.88E-07 | EIF2AK2, IFIT1, IFIT3, ISG15, SAMHD1 |
| JAK1 | kinase | Activated | 2 | 2.32E-08 | HLA-A, IFIT2, MX1, STAT1 |
| IL27 | cytokine | Activated | 2.414 | 5.44E-10 | B2M, HLA-A, HLA-B, ICAM1, STAT1, TAP1 |
| IFNL1 | cytokine | Activated | 3.113 | 4.56E-18 | EIF2AK2, GBP1, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, ISG15, MX1, PML, STAT1, UBE2L6 |
| TNF | cytokine | Activated | 2.706 | 5.82E-08 | GBP1, HLA-B, ICAM1, IFIT3, PML, STAT1, TAP1, TAPBP, TYMP |
| TGM2 | enzyme | Activated | 2.646 | 4.99E-08 | HLA-B, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, SAMHD1, STAT1, TAP1 |
| TLR9 | transmembrane receptor | Activated | 2.236 | 2.15E-08 | IFIT1, IFIT3, ISG15, MX1, STAT1 |
| IFNB1 | cytokine | Activated | 2.623 | 1.35E-13 | IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, ISG15, MX1, PML, STAT1 |
| IFNG | cytokine | Activated | 3.096 | 4.58E-17 | EIF2AK2, GBP1, HLA-A, HLA-B, ICAM1, IFIT1, IFIT3, INS, ISG15, MX1, PML, STAT1, TAP1, TYMP |
| IFNA2 | cytokine | Activated | 3.148 | 1.26E-16 | EIF2AK2, GBP1, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, ISG15, MX1, PML, STAT1, UBE2L6 |
| EIF2AK2* | kinase | Activated | 2.412 | 5.44E-10 | EIF2AK2, IFIT1, ISG15, SAMHD1, STAT1, UBE2L6 |
| EBI3 | cytokine | Activated | 2.449 | 9.50E-13 | B2M, HLA-A, HLA-B, ICAM1, STAT1, TAP1 |
| IL1RN | cytokine | Inhibited | -2.433 | 2.16E-09 | GBP1, ICAM1, IFIT3, INS, MX1, PML |
*Expression fold change 1.927.
Figure 3RNA-Seq heatmap showing the top 1000 genes differentially expressed in SC-β cells following CVB4 infection. The genes were filtered to have at least 10 transcripts per million (TPM) at any time point. The 1000 most changing genes were then clustered using k-means; within each cluster, genes were ordered using hierarchal clustering. Specific gene names are shown in red if increased during infection by both proteomic and transcriptome analyses, in blue if decreased with infection by both analyses, and in black if notable transcriptome changes occurred in the absence of significant proteomic changes. Five clusters are depicted and full gene lists are available in Table S2.
Figure 4Gene ontology (GO) analysis of most variable genes 24, 48, and 72 h post CVB infection. Figure shows the GO terms for the top 1000 differentially expressed genes identified by RNA-Seq. GO terms are divided into three categories (A) molecular function, (B) cellular component, and (C) biological process.
Figure 5Assessment of perifusion, cytotoxicity, and total insulin in CVB4-infected SC-β cells. (A) Cells were examined by perifusion analysis at 48 h post-infection to measure insulin secretion. The data were normalized to basal insulin secretion values measured prior to challenge with high glucose. Insulin secretion in response to high glucose (20 mM), high glucose plus exendin-4 (10 nM), and KCl (20 mM) was diminished in CVB4-infected cells compared to uninfected cells (left panel). Perifusion data are also presented as the area under the curve (AUC) for insulin secretion under conditions of high glucose (27–60 min), high glucose + exendin-4 (77–108 min), and KCl (112–121 min) (right panel). The mean ± SD for triplicate samples is shown. * p < 0.05, Student’s t-test. (B) Flow cytometry of cells stained with annexin V and 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) showed 2.7-fold and 2.4-fold increases in late apoptotic populations (i.e., annexin V+ and 7-AAD+) in infected compared to uninfected cells at 48 h and 72 h post-infection, respectively. (C) Total insulin content did not differ between uninfected and CVB4-infected cells at either 48 or 72 h. Error bars indicate the SD of values from triplicate wells measured in duplicate. Differences between uninfected and infected cells were not statistically significant. One of two replicate experiments is shown for each panel, with the replicate experiment having similar trends (see Figure S1).