Literature DB >> 32092982

Sugar-Sweetened and Diet Beverage Consumption in Philadelphia One Year after the Beverage Tax.

Yichen Zhong1, Amy H Auchincloss1, Brian K Lee1, Ryan M McKenna2, Brent A Langellier2.   

Abstract

In January 2017, Philadelphia (Pennsylvania) implemented an excise tax ($ 0.015/ounce) on sugar-sweetened and diet beverages. This study is a general population-based study to report on the longer-term impacts of the tax on within-person changes in consumption 12 months after implementation. A quasi-experimental difference-in-difference design was used to contrast Philadelphia vs. nearby comparison cities (Trenton, New Jersey; Camden, New Jersey; and Wilmington, Delaware) at baseline (December 2016-January 2017) vs. 12-month follow-up (December 2017-February 2018). A random-digit-dialing phone survey was administered to a population-based cohort. Analyses assessed changes in 30-day consumption frequency and ounces of sugar-sweetened and diet beverages (and a substitution beverage, bottled water) in the analytic sample (N = 515). After 12 months, relative to the comparison group, Philadelphians were slightly more likely to decrease their frequency of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (39.2% vs. 33.5%), and slightly less likely to increase their frequency of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (38.9% vs. 43.0%). The effects of the tax estimated in the adjusted difference-in-difference analysis were very small (for example, changes in monthly sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in Philadelphia relative to comparison cities was -3.03 times or -51.65 ounces) and confidence intervals were very wide. Results suggested that, one year after implementation, there was no major overall impact of the tax on general population-level consumption of sugar-sweetened or diet beverages, or bottled water. Future studies should test whether the tax's effect differs in vulnerable sub-populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; nutrition; public health; public policy; sugar-sweetened beverages

Year:  2020        PMID: 32092982     DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  5 in total

1.  Sustained Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Prices and Sales Over 2 Years.

Authors:  Joshua Petimar; Laura A Gibson; Jiali Yan; Sara N Bleich; Nandita Mitra; Marsha L Trego; Hannah G Lawman; Christina A Roberto
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.604

2.  Outcomes Following Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tatiana Andreyeva; Keith Marple; Samantha Marinello; Timothy E Moore; Lisa M Powell
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Missed Opportunities: The Need to Promote Public Knowledge and Awareness of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.

Authors:  Emily A Altman; Kristine A Madsen; Laura A Schmidt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Secular Trends in Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Adults, Teens, and Children: The California Health Interview Survey, 2011-2018.

Authors:  Matthew M Lee; Emily Altman; Kristine A Madsen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Time to start addressing (and not just describing) the social determinants of diabetes: results from the NEXT-D 2.0 network.

Authors:  Karen R Siegel; Edward W Gregg; Obidiugwu Kenrik Duru; Lizheng Shi; Carol M Mangione; Pamela L Thornton; Steve Clauser; Mohammed K Ali
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2021-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.