Literature DB >> 32092343

Radiation Dose Escalation or Longer Androgen Suppression to Prevent Distant Progression in Men With Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: 10-Year Data From the TROG 03.04 RADAR Trial.

David Joseph1, James W Denham2, Allison Steigler3, David S Lamb4, Nigel A Spry5, John Stanley6, Tom Shannon7, Gillian Duchesne8, Chris Atkinson9, John H L Matthews10, Sandra Turner11, Lizbeth Kenny12, David Christie13, Keen-Hun Tai8, Nirdosh Kumar Gogna14, Rachel Kearvell15, Judy Murray4, Martin A Ebert16, Annette Haworth17, Brett Delahunt4, Christopher Oldmeadow18, John Attia18.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify the relative effects of duration of androgen suppression (AS) and radiation dose escalation (RDE) on distant progression (DP) in men with locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Participants with locally advanced prostate cancer in the TROG 03.04 RADAR trial were randomized to 6 or 18 months AS ± 18 months zoledronic acid (Z). The trial incorporated a RDE program by stratification at randomization and dosing options were 66, 70, or 74 Gy external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), or 46 Gy EBRT plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDRB). The primary endpoint for this study was distant progression (DP). Secondary endpoints included local progression, bone progression, prostate cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. Effect estimates for AS duration and RDE were derived using Fine and Gray competing risk models adjusting for use of Z, age, tumor stage, Gleason grade group, prostate-specific antigen, and treatment center. Cumulative incidence at 10 years was estimated for each RDE group.
RESULTS: A total of 1051 out of 1071 randomized subjects were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Compared with 6 months AS, 18 months AS significantly reduced DP independently of radiation dose (subhazard ratio 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.87; P = .002). No statistically significant interaction between effect of AS duration and RT dose was observed (Wald test P = .76). In subgroup analyses, DP was significantly reduced by the longer duration of AS in the 70 Gy and HDRB groups but not in the 66 Gy and 74 Gy. Compared with 70 Gy, HDRB significantly reduced DP (subhazard ratio 0.68 [95% CI, 0.57-0.80]; P < .0001) independently of AS duration. At 10 years, adjusted cumulative incidences were 26.1% (95% CI, 18.9%-33.2%), 26.7% (22.9%-30.6%), 24.9% (20.0%-29.8%) and 19.7% (15.5%-23.8%) for DPs in the respective radiation dose groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 6 months AS, 18 months AS reduced DP independently of radiation dose. Men treated with HDRB gained a significant benefit from a longer duration of AS. Evidence of improved oncologic outcomes for HDRB compared with dose-escalated EBRT needs to be confirmed in a randomized trial.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32092343     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of brachytherapy boost and androgen deprivation therapy on survival outcomes for patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Neal Andruska; Temitope Agabalogun; Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck; Randall J Brenneman; Yi Huang; Hiram A Gay; Jeff M Michalski; Ruben Carmona; Brian C Baumann
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 2.  Stereotactic Radiation Therapy versus Brachytherapy: Relative Strengths of Two Highly Efficient Options for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Manon Kissel; Gilles Créhange; Pierre Graff
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Association of Increased Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels After Treatment and Mortality in Men With Locally Advanced vs Localized Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Martin T King; Ming-Hui Chen; Laurence Collette; Anouk Neven; Michel Bolla; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

4.  Long-Term Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0321: A Phase II Trial of Combined High Dose Rate Brachytherapy and External Beam Radiation Therapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate.

Authors:  I-Chow Hsu; Joseph P Rodgers; Katsuto Shinohara; James Purdy; Jeff Michalski; Mack Roach; Eric Vigneault; Robert A Ivker; Rodger M Pryzant; Michael Kuettel; Daniel Taussky; Gary S Gustafson; Adam Raben; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 8.013

5.  Reply to L. C. Mendez et al and M. A. Kollmeier et al.

Authors:  William C Jackson; Holly E Hartman; Robert T Dess; Daniel E Spratt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 50.717

6.  Phase I/IIa trial of androgen deprivation therapy, external beam radiotherapy, and stereotactic body radiotherapy boost for high-risk prostate cancer (ADEBAR).

Authors:  Yeon Joo Kim; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim; Young Seok Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Lung Subregion Partitioning by Incremental Dose Intervals Improves Omics-Based Prediction for Acute Radiation Pneumonitis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Bing Li; Xiaoli Zheng; Jiang Zhang; Saikit Lam; Wei Guo; Yunhan Wang; Sunan Cui; Xinzhi Teng; Yuanpeng Zhang; Zongrui Ma; Ta Zhou; Zhaoyang Lou; Lingguang Meng; Hong Ge; Jing Cai
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Comparison of Multimodal Therapies and Outcomes Among Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Adverse Clinicopathologic Features.

Authors:  Amar U Kishan; R Jeffrey Karnes; Tahmineh Romero; Jessica K Wong; Giovanni Motterle; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Eric A Klein; Bradley J Stish; Robert T Dess; Daniel E Spratt; Avinash Pilar; Chandana Reddy; Rebecca Levin-Epstein; Trude B Wedde; Wolfgang A Lilleby; Ryan Fiano; Gregory S Merrick; Richard G Stock; D Jeffrey Demanes; Brian J Moran; Michelle Braccioforte; Hartwig Huland; Phuoc T Tran; Santiago Martin; Rafael Martínez-Monge; Daniel J Krauss; Eyad I Abu-Isa; Ridwan Alam; Zeyad Schwen; Albert J Chang; Thomas M Pisansky; Richard Choo; Daniel Y Song; Stephen Greco; Curtiland Deville; Todd McNutt; Theodore L DeWeese; Ashley E Ross; Jay P Ciezki; Paul C Boutros; Nicholas G Nickols; Prashant Bhat; David Shabsovich; Jesus E Juarez; Natalie Chong; Patrick A Kupelian; Anthony V D'Amico; Matthew B Rettig; Alejandro Berlin; Jonathan D Tward; Brian J Davis; Robert E Reiter; Michael L Steinberg; David Elashoff; Eric M Horwitz; Rahul D Tendulkar; Derya Tilki
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01

9.  Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis.

Authors:  Amit Roy; Randall J Brenneman; Jacob Hogan; Justin M Barnes; Yi Huang; Robert Morris; Sreekrishna Goddu; Michael Altman; Jose Garcia-Ramirez; Harold Li; Jacqueline E Zoberi; Arnold Bullock; Eric Kim; Zachary Smith; Robert Figenshau; Gerald L Andriole; Brian C Baumann; Jeff M Michalski; Hiram A Gay
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13

Review 10.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Rationale, current applications, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Iosif Strouthos; Efstratios Karagiannis; Nikolaos Zamboglou; Konstantinos Ferentinos
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-06-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.