Literature DB >> 32091397

Effects of coronary sinus Reducer implantation on oxygen kinetics in patients with refractory angina.

Carlo Zivelonghi1, Maayan Konigstein, Alessia Azzano, Pierfrancesco Agostoni, Yan Topilski, Shmuel Banai, Stefan Verheye.   

Abstract

AIMS: Refractory angina is still a major public health problem. The coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) has recently been introduced as an alternative treatment to reduce symptoms in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate objective improvements in effort tolerance and oxygen kinetics as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients suffering from refractory angina undergoing CSR implantation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this multicentre prospective study, patients with chronic refractory angina undergoing CSR implantation were scheduled for CPET before the index procedure and at six-month follow-up. The main endpoints of this analysis were improvements in VO2 max and in VO2 at the anaerobic threshold (AT). Clinical events and improvements in symptoms were also recorded. A total of 37 patients formed the study population. The CSR implantation procedure was successful and without complications in all. At follow-up CPET, significant improvement in VO2 max (+0.97 ml/kg/min [+11.3%]; 12.2±3.6 ml/kg/min at baseline vs 13.2±3.7 ml/kg/min, p=0.026), and workload (+12.9 [+34%]; 68±28 W vs 81±49 W, p=0.05) were observed, with non-significant differences in VO2 at the AT (9.84±3.4 ml/kg/min vs 10.74±3.05 ml/kg/min, p=0.06). Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grade improved from a mean of 3.2±0.5 to 1.6±0.8 (p<0.01), and significant benefits in all Seattle Angina Questionnaire variables were shown.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with obstructive coronary artery disease suffering from refractory angina, the implantation of a CSR was associated with objective improvement in exercise capacity and oxygen kinetics at CPET, suggesting a possible reduction of myocardial ischaemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32091397     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  3 in total

1.  The Coronary Sinus Reducer; 5-year Dutch experience.

Authors:  M J M Silvis; M Dekker; C Zivelonghi; P Agostoni; P R Stella; P A Doevendans; D P V de Kleijn; J P van Kuijk; G E Leenders; L Timmers
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation - A multicenter study.

Authors:  Maayan Konigstein; Francesco Ponticelli; Carlo Zivelonghi; Ilan Merdler; Miri Revivo; Stefan Verheye; Francesco Giannini; Shmuel Banai
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.287

3.  Coronary sinus reducer transfemoral extraction after intraprocedural device migration: A case report.

Authors:  Matjaz Bunc; Miha Sustersic; Crt Langel; Dimitrij Kuhelj; Shmuel Banai
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.