Literature DB >> 32090813

Estimation of abatement potentials and costs of air pollution emissions in China.

Fenfen Zhang1, Jia Xing2, Yang Zhou3, Shuxiao Wang4, Bin Zhao5, Haotian Zheng1, Xiao Zhao6, Huanzhen Chang6, Carey Jang7, Yun Zhu8, Jiming Hao1.   

Abstract

Understanding the air pollution emission abatement potential and associated control cost is a prerequisite to design cost efficient control policies. In this study, a linear programming algorithm model, International Control Cost Estimate Tool, was updated with cost data for applications of 56 types of end-of-pipe technologies and five types of renewable energy in 10 major sectors namely power generation, industry combustion, cement production, iron and steel production, other industry processes, domestic combustion, transportation, solvent use, livestock rearing, and fertilizer use. The updated model was implemented to estimate the abatement potential and marginal cost of multiple pollutants in China. The total maximum abatement potentials of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), primary particulate matter (PM2.5), non-volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs), and ammonia (NH3) in China were estimated to be 19.2, 20.8, 9.1, 17.2 and 8.6 Mt, respectively, which accounted for 89.7%, 89.9%, 94.6%, 74.0%, and 80.2% of their total emissions in 2014, respectively. The associated control cost of such reductions was estimated as 92.5, 469.7, 75.7, 449.0, and 361.8 billion CNY in SO2, NOx, primary PM2.5, NMVOCs and NH3, respectively. Shandong, Jiangsu, Henan, Zhejiang, and Guangdong provinces exhibited large abatement potentials for all pollutants. Provincial disparity analysis shows that high GDP regions tend to have higher reduction potential and total abatement costs. End-of-pipe technologies tended be a cost-efficient way to control pollution in industries processes (i.e., cement plants, iron and steel plants, lime production, building ceramic production, glass and brick production), whereas such technologies were less cost-effective in fossil fuel-related sectors (i.e., power plants, industry combustion, domestic combustion, and transportation) compared with renewable energy. The abatement potentials and marginal abatement cost curves developed in this study can further be used as a crucial component in an integrated model to design optimized cost-efficient control policies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abatement potential; Cost estimation; End-of-pipe control measures; Marginal abatement cost; Multiple pollutants; Multiple sectors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32090813      PMCID: PMC8336370          DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  13 in total

1.  Cost-effective control of SO2 emissions in Asia.

Authors:  J Cofala; M Amann; F Gyarfas; W Schoepp; J C Boudri; L Hordijk; C Kroeze; Li Junfeng; Dai Lin; T S Panwar; S Gupta
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline.

Authors:  Jason Hill; Stephen Polasky; Erik Nelson; David Tilman; Hong Huo; Lindsay Ludwig; James Neumann; Haochi Zheng; Diego Bonta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Role of sectoral and multi-pollutant emission control strategies in improving atmospheric visibility in the Yangtze River Delta, China.

Authors:  Kan Huang; Joshua S Fu; Yang Gao; Xinyi Dong; Guoshun Zhuang; Yanfen Lin
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Intra-annual variations of regional aerosol optical depth, vertical distribution, and particle types from multiple satellite and ground-based observational datasets.

Authors:  Bin Zhao; Jonathan H Jiang; David J Diner; Hui Su; Yu Gu; Kuo-Nan Liou; Zhe Jiang; Lei Huang; Yoshi Takano; Xuehua Fan; Ali H Omar
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 6.133

5.  Public Health Costs of Primary PM2.5 and Inorganic PM2.5 Precursor Emissions in the United States.

Authors:  Jinhyok Heo; Peter J Adams; H Oliver Gao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Estimation of health and economic costs of air pollution over the Pearl River Delta region in China.

Authors:  Xingcheng Lu; Teng Yao; Jimmy C H Fung; Changqing Lin
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  A fresh look at the benefits and costs of the US acid rain program.

Authors:  Lauraine G Chestnut; David M Mills
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 8.  Particulate matter pollution over China and the effects of control policies.

Authors:  Jiandong Wang; Bin Zhao; Shuxiao Wang; Fumo Yang; Jia Xing; Lidia Morawska; Aijun Ding; Markku Kulmala; Veli-Matti Kerminen; Joni Kujansuu; Zifa Wang; Dian Ding; Xiaoye Zhang; Huanbo Wang; Mi Tian; Tuukka Petäjä; Jingkun Jiang; Jiming Hao
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Use of satellite observations for long-term exposure assessment of global concentrations of fine particulate matter.

Authors:  Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Michael Brauer; Brian L Boys
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Historical Trends in PM2.5-Related Premature Mortality during 1990-2010 across the Northern Hemisphere.

Authors:  Jiandong Wang; Jia Xing; Rohit Mathur; Jonathan E Pleim; Shuxiao Wang; Christian Hogrefe; Chuen-Meei Gan; David C Wong; Jiming Hao
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Large-scale optimization of multi-pollutant control strategies in the Pearl River Delta region of China using a genetic algorithm in machine learning.

Authors:  Jinying Huang; Yun Zhu; James T Kelly; Carey Jang; Shuxiao Wang; Jia Xing; Pen-Chi Chiang; Shaojia Fan; Xuetao Zhao; Lian Yu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Predicting the Nonlinear Response of PM2.5 and Ozone to Precursor Emission Changes with a Response Surface Model.

Authors:  James T Kelly; Carey Jang; Yun Zhu; Shicheng Long; Jia Xing; Shuxiao Wang; Benjamin N Murphy; Havala O T Pye
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.110

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.