Jennifer Thomas1, Katie Thirlaway2, Nicola Bowes2, Robert Meyers2. 1. School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University. Electronic address: jethomas@cardiffmet.ac.uk. 2. School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Despite a vast evidence-base advocating the psychological benefits of physical activity, relatively little is understood about how combining physical activity with psychological therapies may influence these positive effects. The aim of this paper is to systematically analyse evidence from studies adopting a combined approach, and identify potential mechanisms of action on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The Embase, PsycINFO and Medline (PubMed and OVID) databases were searched for applicable trials published up to December 2018. Relevant data was extracted from eligible studies, and the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool was utilised to objectively assess the quality of each study. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, seven of which were rated as methodologically `strong'. Combining physical activity with psychological therapy consistently engendered positive effects on outcomes compared with treatment as usual. Similar improvements in psychological outcomes were observed in most (7/8) groups receiving physical activity alone. Increased levels of physical activity were observed in psychologically-informed interventions, however this effect was unrelated to changes in psychological outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded meta-analyses of results, while risk of bias detected in the studies may compromise overall validity of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity interventions may be a viable alternative to psychological therapies, provided psychological approaches are incorporated into the implementation design (i.e. behavioural activation). Improved psychological outcomes may be observed regardless of `dose' received, however further research is required to ascertain whether psychosocial mechanisms of change mediate positive effects. Crown
OBJECTIVE: Despite a vast evidence-base advocating the psychological benefits of physical activity, relatively little is understood about how combining physical activity with psychological therapies may influence these positive effects. The aim of this paper is to systematically analyse evidence from studies adopting a combined approach, and identify potential mechanisms of action on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The Embase, PsycINFO and Medline (PubMed and OVID) databases were searched for applicable trials published up to December 2018. Relevant data was extracted from eligible studies, and the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool was utilised to objectively assess the quality of each study. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, seven of which were rated as methodologically `strong'. Combining physical activity with psychological therapy consistently engendered positive effects on outcomes compared with treatment as usual. Similar improvements in psychological outcomes were observed in most (7/8) groups receiving physical activity alone. Increased levels of physical activity were observed in psychologically-informed interventions, however this effect was unrelated to changes in psychological outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded meta-analyses of results, while risk of bias detected in the studies may compromise overall validity of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity interventions may be a viable alternative to psychological therapies, provided psychological approaches are incorporated into the implementation design (i.e. behavioural activation). Improved psychological outcomes may be observed regardless of `dose' received, however further research is required to ascertain whether psychosocial mechanisms of change mediate positive effects. Crown
Authors: Freya Oswald; Jennifer Campbell; Chloë Williamson; Justin Richards; Paul Kelly Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: José Alberto Benítez-Andrades; Maria-Esther Vidal; Rafael Pastor-Vargas; María Teresa García-Ordás; José-Manuel Alija-Pérez Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2022-02-24
Authors: Ana R Alves; Renata Dias; Henrique P Neiva; Daniel A Marinho; Mário C Marques; António C Sousa; Vânia Loureiro; Nuno Loureiro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rodrigo L Vancini; Marília S Andrade; Ricardo B Viana; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Beat Knechtle; Cássia R V Campanharo; Alexandre A de Almeida; Paulo Gentil; Claudio A B de Lira Journal: Sports Med Health Sci Date: 2021-05-01