Literature DB >> 32090758

Exploration of experiences with and understanding of polygenic risk scores for bipolar disorder.

Sophie Putt1, Tatiane Yanes2, Bettina Meiser2, Rajneesh Kaur2, Janice M Fullerton3, Kristine Barlow-Stewart4, Peter R Schofield3, Claudio Toma3, Holly Peay5, Philip B Mitchell6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) summarise genetic risk in complex genetic disorders such as bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this study was to gain in-depth, nuanced information regarding the understanding and experience of receiving a PRS for BD from individuals who already have a BD diagnosis.
METHODS: Participants from a previous genetics study were invited to receive their PRS in a face-to-face consultation with a genetic counsellor or psychiatrist. Four weeks later, semi-structured interviews were conducted, with 14 'acceptors' (those who chose to receive their PRS) and 4 'decliners' (those who did not wish to receive their PRS).
RESULTS: Four themes were developed: (1) An easy decision, (2) A positive experience, (3) The grey area, and (4) The future is exciting and frightening. Despite some reported initial shock and distress, all acceptors described the experience of receiving their PRS as a positive one. It allowed them to better understand their condition and/or reduced feelings of self-blame. Decliners chose not to receive their results because of a lack of perceived usefulness or concern that PRS may hinder personal recovery. LIMITATIONS: Given the qualitative design of the study, statistically valid generalisations cannot be undertaken, nor can causal relationships be established.
CONCLUSIONS: PRS for BD were generally well accepted and understood. Knowledge regarding the impact of PRS for BD ensures that counselling frameworks are responsive to patient needs as well as informing education for psychiatrists and genetic counsellors, who will play pivotal roles in future polygenic testing provision.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Bipolar disorder; Experiences; Genetic testing; Polygenic risk score; Understanding

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32090758     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  2 in total

1.  A qualitative study exploring the consumer experience of receiving self-initiated polygenic risk scores from a third-party website.

Authors:  Kiara Lowes; Kennedy Borle; Lasse Folkersen; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 5.351

2.  Perceptions of causal attribution and attitudes to genetic testing among people with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives.

Authors:  Melissa B R Cullen; Bettina Meiser; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Melissa Green; Paul S Appelbaum; Vaughan J Carr; Murray J Cairns; M S Lebowitz; Rajneesh Kaur
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.351

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.