Eva A Graham1, Sonya S Deschênes2, Marina N Khalil3, Sofia Danna4, Kristian B Filion5, Norbert Schmitz6. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: eva.graham@mail.mcgill.ca. 2. School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 3. Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 4. Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Depression is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to determine whether the association between depression and incident type 2 diabetes differs by measure of depression. METHODS: Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Web of Science Emerging Sources Citation Index and Conference Proceedings Citation Index, Cochrane Library, the University of York Center for Reviews and Dissemination, abstracts from the PsychoSocial Aspects of Diabetes conference. INCLUSION CRITERIA: comparison of participants with and without depression, depression measured at age 18 or older, longitudinal follow-up with an outcome of type 2 diabetes, effect estimate adjusted for important confounders, full-text available in English or French, and study at overall low or moderate risk of bias. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies reporting twenty-five effect estimates were included. Depressive symptom scales, clinical interviews, physician diagnoses, and use of antidepressants were all associated with an increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes. When all measures of depression were combined, the meta-analyzed risk ratio for type 2 diabetes was 1.18 (95% CI 1.12-1.24, I2=45.4%). Results did not provide conclusive evidence that the association between depression and incident diabetes differs by measure of depression. LIMITATIONS: Results showed heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that various measures of depression may be used to identify individuals at higher risk of type 2 diabetes.
BACKGROUND:Depression is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to determine whether the association between depression and incident type 2 diabetes differs by measure of depression. METHODS: Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Web of Science Emerging Sources Citation Index and Conference Proceedings Citation Index, Cochrane Library, the University of York Center for Reviews and Dissemination, abstracts from the PsychoSocial Aspects of Diabetes conference. INCLUSION CRITERIA: comparison of participants with and without depression, depression measured at age 18 or older, longitudinal follow-up with an outcome of type 2 diabetes, effect estimate adjusted for important confounders, full-text available in English or French, and study at overall low or moderate risk of bias. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies reporting twenty-five effect estimates were included. Depressive symptom scales, clinical interviews, physician diagnoses, and use of antidepressants were all associated with an increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes. When all measures of depression were combined, the meta-analyzed risk ratio for type 2 diabetes was 1.18 (95% CI 1.12-1.24, I2=45.4%). Results did not provide conclusive evidence that the association between depression and incident diabetes differs by measure of depression. LIMITATIONS: Results showed heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that various measures of depression may be used to identify individuals at higher risk of type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Emily A Vargas; Diana A Chirinos; Mandy Wong; Mercedes R Carnethon; Allison J Carroll; Catarina I Kiefe; April P Carson; Kiarri N Kershaw Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2021-10-20
Authors: Raphael S Peter; Andrea Jaensch; Ute Mons; Ben Schöttker; Roman Schmucker; Wolfgang Koenig; Hermann Brenner; Dietrich Rothenbacher Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Elizabeth J Gifford; Stephen H Boyle; Jacqueline Vahey; Kellie J Sims; Jimmy T Efird; Blair Chesnut; Crystal Stafford; Julie Upchurch; Christina D Williams; Drew A Helmer; Elizabeth R Hauser Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Alma Delia Genis-Mendoza; Thelma Beatriz González-Castro; Gisselle Tovilla-Vidal; Isela Esther Juárez-Rojop; Rosa Giannina Castillo-Avila; María Lilia López-Narváez; Carlos Alfonso Tovilla-Zárate; Juan Pablo Sánchez-de la Cruz; Ana Fresán; Humberto Nicolini Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-08-08
Authors: Eva Graham; Tristan Watson; Sonya S Deschênes; Kristian B Filion; Mélanie Henderson; Sam Harper; Laura C Rosella; Norbert Schmitz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 4.379