BACKGROUND: Laminar flow ventilation systems were developed to reduce surgical contamination in joint arthroplasty to avoid periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The goals of this study are to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and economic viability of installing and maintaining a laminar flow system in an operating room. METHODS: A Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate the cost effectiveness of laminar flow. The variables included were cost to treat PJI, incidence of PJI, cost of laminar flow, years of operating room use, and arthroplasty volume as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Laminar flow would be financially-justified when 1,217 (SD: 319) TSA cases are performed annually with assumed 10% reduction in PJI from laminar flow and 487 (SD: 127) with assumed 25% reduction. In a high volume OR, laminar flow costs $25.24 per case (assuming 10% reduction) and $8.24 per case (assuming 25% reduction). Laminar flow would need to reduce the incidence of PJI by 35.1% (SD: 9.1) to be a cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates the substantial arthroplasty volume and large reduction in PJI rates required to justify the installation and maintenance costs of this technology. This high cost of implementation should be considered prior to installing laminar flow systems.
BACKGROUND: Laminar flow ventilation systems were developed to reduce surgical contamination in joint arthroplasty to avoid periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The goals of this study are to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and economic viability of installing and maintaining a laminar flow system in an operating room. METHODS: A Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate the cost effectiveness of laminar flow. The variables included were cost to treat PJI, incidence of PJI, cost of laminar flow, years of operating room use, and arthroplasty volume as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Laminar flow would be financially-justified when 1,217 (SD: 319) TSA cases are performed annually with assumed 10% reduction in PJI from laminar flow and 487 (SD: 127) with assumed 25% reduction. In a high volume OR, laminar flow costs $25.24 per case (assuming 10% reduction) and $8.24 per case (assuming 25% reduction). Laminar flow would need to reduce the incidence of PJI by 35.1% (SD: 9.1) to be a cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates the substantial arthroplasty volume and large reduction in PJI rates required to justify the installation and maintenance costs of this technology. This high cost of implementation should be considered prior to installing laminar flow systems.
Authors: Parham Sendi; Markus Rohrbach; Peter Graber; Reno Frei; Peter E Ochsner; Werner Zimmerli Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-09-08 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Benjamin Zmistowski; Joseph A Karam; Joel B Durinka; David S Casper; Javad Parvizi Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Nicholas B Frisch; Andrew M Pepper; Toufic R Jildeh; Jonathan Shaw; Trent Guthrie; Craig Silverton Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Jasvinder A Singh; John W Sperling; Cathy Schleck; William S Harmsen; Robert H Cofield Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Kerryl E Piper; Melissa J Jacobson; Robert H Cofield; John W Sperling; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Douglas R Osmon; Andrew McDowell; Sheila Patrick; James M Steckelberg; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Marta Fernandez Sampedro; Robin Patel Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Diego Villacis; Lakshmanan Sivasundaram; William C Pannell; Nathanael Heckmann; Reza Omid; George F Rick Hatch Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Nazeem A Virani; Christopher D Williams; Rachel Clark; John Polikandriotis; Katheryne L Downes; Mark A Frankle Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Nazeem A Virani; Christopher D Williams; Rachel Clark; John Polikandriotis; Katheryne L Downes; Mark A Frankle Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2013-03-17 Impact factor: 3.019