| Literature DB >> 32090061 |
Randall Syedd-León1, Rafael Orozco2, Víctor Álvarez1, Yendry Carvajal1, Gerardo Rodríguez1.
Abstract
The cultivation of native corn has decreased in favor of the cultivation of improved commercial corn varieties. This study seeks to evaluate the antioxidant and antibacterial potential of 36 samples of native corn germplasm from the Brunca (BR) and Chorotega (CR) regions of Costa Rica. The main parameters of comparison were the composition of antioxidant compounds, antiradical activity, and microbicidal effect. The total amount of polyphenols in the germplasm (120 mg GAE/100 g d.w.) was not related to the regions from which the samples were obtained. The overall average for antioxidant capacity was 21.20 μmol TE/g d.w. Accessions from the CR region had higher antioxidant capacity. Anthocyanin content was higher in purple accessions and undetectable in white germplasm. Antioxidant capacity was statistically related to polyphenols content (r = 0.714, p < 0.01). The most promising corn accessions in terms of nutraceutical value came from the CR region.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32090061 PMCID: PMC7014556 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2439541
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Figure 1Absolute absorbance of a sample of native corn with different mixed solvent extracts (a) and progressive number of successive extractions (b), using the Folin–Ciocalteu method.
Total polyphenol content present in accessions of native corn from the Brunca and Chorotega regions, using the Folin–Ciocalteu method.
| Germplasm ID | Color | mg GAE /100 g d.w. | Germplasm ID | Color | mg GAE/100 g d.w. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTEC02 | White | 97 ± 6.0d–i | CUNA05 | Purple | 135 ± 15b–e |
| BTEC03 | White | 107 ± 7.0d–i | CUNA08 | White | 80 ± 7.0f–i |
| BTEC04 | White | 101 ± 8.0d–i | CUNA11 | Purple | 172 ± 19bc |
| BTEC05 | White | 102 ± 1.0d–h | CUNA12 | Purple | 88 ± 5.0e–i |
| BTEC06 | White | 112 ± 8.0d–i | CUNA14 | White | 98 ± 4.0d–i |
| BTEC07 | Yellow | 118 ± 8.0def | CUNA15 | Purple | 92 ± 11e–i |
| BTEC08 | White | 180 ± 9.0b | CUNA17 | White | 63 ± 3.0ghi |
| BTEC09 | Yellow | 132 ± 22b–f | CUNA19 | Yellow | 61 ± 6.0hi |
| BTEC10 | Yellow | 129 ± 8.0b–f | CUNA20 | Purple | 274 ± 11a |
| BTEC11 | White | 111 ± 9.0d–i | CUNA24 | Purple | 134 ± 0.1b–e |
| BTEC12 | Yellow | 118 ± 5.0def | CUNA25 | White | 80 ± 5.0f–i |
| BTEC13 | White | 80 ± 1.0b–e | CUNA29 | Yellow | 124 ± 0.1c–f |
| BTEC14 | Yellow | 132 ± 7.0b–f | CUNA31 | Yellow | 112 ± 5.0d–i |
| BTEC15 | Yellow | 117 ± 6.0def | CUNA32 | Yellow | 112 ± 2.0d–i |
| CUCR03 | Purple | 110 ± 1.0d–i | CUNA35 | Purple | 146 ± 14bcd |
| CUCR05 | Purple | 105 ± 6.0d–i | CUNA38 | White | 115 ± 3.0d–g |
| CUNA01 | Purple | 245 ± 12a | CUNA39 | White | 135 ± 6.0b–e |
| CUNA04 | Yellow | 59 ± 1.0i | CUNA44 | Yellow | 149 ± 2.0bcd |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. BTEC comes from the Brunca region, while the rest are from the Chorotega region. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) using the Tukey test in the total set of accessions.
Characterization of antioxidant activity of corn accessions from the Chorotega and Brunca regions, obtained using the ORAC method.
| Germplasm |
| Germplasm |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CUNA11 | 66.49 ± 0.51a | BTEC10 | 16.93 ± 2.69cde |
| CUNA20 | 55.41 ± 8.03ab | CUNA31 | 16.71 ± 2.73def |
| CUNA05 | 48.06 ± 1.93b | CUNA32 | 16.49 ± 1.83def |
| CUNA01 | 43.72 ± 1.25b | CUCR03 | 15.85 ± 0.07def |
| CUNA44 | 28.68 ± 2.38c | BTEC11 | 15.50 ± 0.48def |
| CUNA35 | 24.64 ± 0.28cd | BTEC06 | 15.04 ± 3.19def |
| CUNA39 | 23.46 ± 1.65cd | BTEC07 | 14.66 ± 3.27def |
| CUNA24 | 23.18 ± 0.56cd | BTEC14 | 14.55 ± 2.26def |
| CUCR05 | 23.09 ± 0.52cd | CUNA15 | 13.92 ± 0.41def |
| CUNA04 | 22.88 ± 6.42cd | BTEC02 | 13.72 ± 2.30def |
| CUNA38 | 22.42 ± 3.61cde | BTEC05 | 13.55 ± 2.67def |
| BTEC09 | 20.96 ± 6.36cde | BTEC04 | 13.43 ± 2.43def |
| CUNA29 | 19.95 ± 2.10cde | CUNA12 | 13.18 ± 4.92def |
| BTEC12 | 19.04 ± 1.88cde | BTEC03 | 13.13 ± 2.40def |
| BTEC13 | 18.72 ± 2.76cde | CUNA25 | 12.97 ± 2.32def |
| CUNA14 | 18.69 ± 0.38cde | BTEC15 | 12.90 ± 3.55def |
| CUNA17 | 18.53 ± 1.57cde | CUNA08 | 10.72 ± 0.28ef |
| BTEC08 | 17.11 ± 2.99cde | CUNA19 | 4.81 ± 0.61f |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. BTEC samples come from the Brunca region, while the rest are from the Chorotega region. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in Tukey test in the total set of accessions.
Figure 2Graphical representation of the correlation between total polyphenols and antioxidant activity.
Concentration of total anthocyanins in accessions of native corn from the Brunca and Chorotega regions, obtained using the differential pH method.
| Germplasm | Color | mg E C3G/g d.w. |
|---|---|---|
| CUNA01 | Purple | 3.962 ± 0.068a |
| CUNA31 | Yellow | 3.072 ± 0.264b |
| CUNA20 | Purple | 2.803 ± 0.158bc |
| CUNA11 | Purple | 2.738 ± 0.254bcd |
| CUNA32 | Yellow | 2.670 ± 0.386bcd |
| CUNA44 | Yellow | 2.608 ± 0.118bcd |
| CUCR03 | Purple | 2.597 ± 0.063bcd |
| CUNA35 | Purple | 2.597 ± 0.181bcd |
| CUNA29 | Yellow | 2.382 ± 0.239cde |
| CUNA24 | Purple | 2.253 ± 0.097de |
| CUNA05 | Purple | 2.016 ± 0.229e |
| CUCR05 | Purple | 1.474 ± 0.062f |
| CUNA12 | Purple | 1.161 ± 0.081f |
| CUNA15 | Purple | 1.126 ± ± 0.211f |
| BTEC08 | White | 0.560 ± 0.449g |
| CUNA19 | Yellow | 0.555 ± 0.081g |
| CUNA04 | Yellow | 0.492 ± 0.208g |
| BTEC15 | Yellow | 0.435 ± 0.434g |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. BTEC accessions are from the Brunca region, while the rest are from the Chorotega region. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) found using the Tukey test on the total set of accessions.
Antimicrobial activity expressed as a relative percentage of the diameter of the inhibition zone (mm) of corn germplasm using the Kirby–Bauer method.
| Germplasm | Gram-positive bacteria | Gram-negative bacteria | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| RPDIZ (%) | RPDIZ (%) | RPDIZ (%) | RPDIZ (%) | |
| CUNA32 | 43.18 ± 3.90ab | 75.67 ± 8.94a | — | — |
| CUNA38 | 46.47 ± 1.49ab | 70.19 ± 13.02a | — | — |
| BTEC07 | 52.98 ± 13.64ab | — | — | — |
| BTEC11 | 46.77 ± 0.71ab | — | — | — |
| UCR05 | 60.29 ± 3.04a | — | — | — |
| CUNA11 | 38.92 ± 6.67ab | — | 36.34 ± 17.30 | — |
| CUNA19 | 46.93 ± 13.56ab | — | — | — |
| CUNA24 | 34.42 ± 3.56b | — | — | — |
| CUNA35 | — | 76.26 ± 7.09a | — | — |
| BTEC06 | — | — | — | 43.71 ± 5.29a |
| CUNA04 | — | — | — | 43.35 ± 2.76a |
| CUNA44 | — | — | — | 30.92 ± 0.15b |
|
| ||||
| Control (+) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
|
| ||||
| Control (−) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Different letters in the “Tukey HSD” columns indicate significant differences in each column according to the Tukey Test (p < 0.05). Tukey HSD: Honest Significant Difference. SD: standard deviation.