| Literature DB >> 32089931 |
Karen Nishikawa1, Yuka Kimura2, Daisuke Chiba2, Norihiro Sasaki2, Shizuka Sasaki2, Shinji Nishikawa3, Yasuyuki Ishibashi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stress fractures of the metacarpal bones are considered uncommon. We report on 11 adolescent athletes with these stress fractures, successfully treated with cessation of sports activities. Representative case presentation. In case 1, a 15-year-old male tennis player presented with right hand pain of 4-week duration without an acute trauma history. Tenderness existed on palpation along the dorsal and proximal second metacarpal bone. Plain radiographs demonstrated a periosteal reaction on the proximal shaft of the second metacarpal. Racket swinging was suspended. He returned to competitive tennis 2 months after the initial visit and continues to participate without symptoms. In case 2, a 16-year-old male boxer presented with right hand pain of 2-week duration that arose while punching. Acute trauma history was absent. Tenderness existed on palpation over the third metacarpal of the right hand. Plain radiographs demonstrated no periosteal reaction or fracture line. MRI showed a high signal on the third metatarsal bone on fat suppression and a low signal on T2-weighted images. Nonoperative treatment was initiated without external fixation, and punching was suspended. He returned to boxing 1 month after the initial visit without symptoms.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32089931 PMCID: PMC7031721 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5840925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Orthop ISSN: 2090-6757
Figure 1Right hand radiograph showing a periosteal reaction at the ulnar side in the shaft of the second metacarpal.
Figure 2(a) Left hand radiograph showing no periosteal reaction or fracture line in the metacarpal. (b) Fat-suppressed fast spin-echo T2-weighted magnetic resonance showing high signal intensity in the shaft of the left third metacarpal.
Profile and clinical results in the eleven cases of metacarpal stress fracture.
| Case | Age (years) | Sex | Time from onset to initial visit (weeks) | Metacarpal | Location | Sports | Time from initial visit to return to sports (weeks) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | F | 2 | Second | Shaft | Badminton | 4 |
| 2 | 14 | F | 1 | Second | Base | Soft tennis | 12 |
| 3 | 14 | M | 3 | Second | Base | Badminton | 4 |
| 4 | 15 | M | 4 | Second | Base | Tennis | 3 |
| 5 | 16 | M | 2 | Third | Shaft | Boxing | 4 |
| 6 | 16 | M | 2 | Second | Shaft | Tennis | 4 |
| 7 | 16 | F | 3 | Second | Base | Tennis | 10 |
| 8 | 18 | F | 1 | Second | Shaft | Tennis | 4 |
| 9 | 18 | M | 52 | Second | Shaft | Boxing | 5 |
| 10 | 22 | F | 1 | Second | Shaft | Tennis | 4 |
| 11 | 24 | M | 2 | Second | Shaft | Bowling | 4 |
Figure 3(a) Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI showing high signal intensity in the base of the second metacarpal. (b) Finite element analysis showing the stress distribution of the second metacarpal. Maximum stress was present at the base of the second metacarpal bone.
Figure 4(a) Eastern and (b) western grip style.