| Literature DB >> 32089753 |
Shaozhen Feng1,2, Zhong Zhong1,2, Jinjin Fan1,2, Xiaoyan Li1,2, Dianchun Shi1,2, Lanping Jiang1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It was reported that gut-kidney axis may play an important role in IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Previous five GWASs of different populations for IgAN have discovered several genes related to intestinal immunity, including DEFA gene. However, the roles of the encoded proteins of DEFA5/6 which were called intestinal antimicrobial peptides HD5 and HD6 were not clear in kidney disease, such as IgAN. The purpose of this study was to clarify the association of HD5 and HD6 with IgAN.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32089753 PMCID: PMC7025039 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2078279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.464
Clinical information of IgAN patients and normal controls at baseline.
| Normal controls ( | IgAN patients ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 16/19 | 29/24 | 0.414 |
| Age (years) | 35.93 ± 9.56 | 32.76 ± 10.01 | 0.567 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 114.07 ± 20.18 | 77.13 ± 38.72 | 0.006 |
| Serum creatinine ( | 62.51 (56, 73.5) | 99 (69, 152) | <0.001 |
| Proteinuria range (g/24 h) | 0a | 1.18 (0.67, 3.21) | — |
| WBC (×109/L) | 6.49 ± 1.25 | 7.21 ± 1.79 | 0.047 |
| Neutrophil (×109/L) | 3.56 ± 0.98 | 4.53 ± 1.66 | 0.003 |
| Monocyte (×109/L) | 0.40 ± 0.14 | 0.49 ± 0.22 | 0.032 |
| Lymphocyte (×109/L) | 2.36 ± 0.57 | 1.98 ± 0.55 | 0.003 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | — | 0.83 (0.82, 1.22) | — |
| IgA (g/L) | — | 2.83 ± 0.79 | — |
| IgG (g/L) | — | 10.01 ± 3.33 | — |
| IgM (g/L) | — | 1.40 ± 1.03 | — |
| C3 (g/L) | — | 1.01 ± 0.19 | — |
| C4 (g/L) | — | 0.23 ± 0.07 | — |
|
|
| ||
| M0 | — | 14 (26.42%) | — |
| M1 | — | 39 (73.58%) | — |
| E0 | — | 15 (28.30%) | — |
| E1 | — | 38 (71.70%) | — |
| S0 | — | 47 (88.68%) | — |
| S1 | — | 6 (11.32%) | — |
| T0 | — | 35 (66.04%) | — |
| T1 | — | 13 (24.53%) | — |
| T2 | — | 5 (9.43%) | — |
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) was calculated using the modified MDRD formula as follows: eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 175 × (creatinine, mg/dL)−1.234 × (age, years)−0.179 × (if female, ×0.79) [37]. aNormal controls without proteinuria were included.
Figure 1Scatter dot plots of HD5 and HD6 measurements in IgAN patients. ELISA was used to determine the serum levels of HD5 (a) and HD6 (b), as well as urinary levels of HD5 (c) and HD6 (d) in Chinese IgAN patients and normal controls. Line indicates median with interquartile range. P value analysis: nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U).
Univariate correlations of serum HD5 and HD6 with clinical-pathological variables in IgAN patients at baseline.
| Serum levels | HD5 | HD6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Gender (male/female) | -0.062 | 0.664 |
|
|
| Age (years) |
|
| -0.092 | 0.517 |
| CKD grade |
|
| -0.028 | 0.842 |
| Serum creatinine ( |
|
| 0.020 | 0.889 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) |
|
| 0.101 | 0.480 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 0.131 | 0.409 | 0.187 | 0.236 |
| WBC (×109/L) | -0.065 | 0.653 | 0.283 | 0.047 |
| Neutrophil (×109/L) | 0.001 | 0.992 | 0.257 | 0.072 |
| Monocyte (×109/L) | -0.003 | 0.984 | 0.085 | 0.557 |
| Lymphocyte (×109/L) | -0.166 | 0.249 | 0.041 | 0.776 |
| IgA (g/L) | 0.097 | 0.516 | 0.149 | 0.317 |
| IgG (g/L) | -0.225 | 0.129 | 0.064 | 0.669 |
| IgM (g/L) | -0.126 | 0.399 | -0.158 | 0.288 |
| C3 (g/L) | 0.129 | 0.386 | -0.002 | 0.990 |
| C4 (g/L) | 0.104 | 0.487 | -0.057 | 0.704 |
| Proteinuria (g/24 h) |
|
| -0.126 | 0.388 |
| Mesangial hypercellularity (M) | -0.299 | 0.065 | -0.036 | 0.806 |
| Segmental glomerulosclerosis (S) | 0.218 | 0.183 | 0.018 | 0.900 |
| Endocapillary hypercellularity (E) | -0.112 | 0.435 | -0.227 | 0.109 |
| Tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T) |
|
| -0.069 | 0.631 |
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (Spearman). P value < 0.05 was indicated in bold.
Forward stepwise multivariate regression analysis for predictors of HD5/HD6 in IgAN patients (n = 53).
| Dependent | Variable | B ± SE |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HD5 | eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | ‐0.038 ± 0.011 | -3.355 | 0.002 | 0.806 |
| Tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T) | 2.410 ± 0.760 | 3.171 | 0.004 | ||
| HD6 | Gender | ‐9.053 ± 4.052 | -2.234 | 0.034 | 0.389 |
SE: standard error. Model is adjusted for age, gender, eGFR, log transformed 24 hr proteinuria, log transformed CRP, mesangial hypercellularity (M), and tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T).
Figure 2Scatter dot plot and gender difference of serum HD6 in IgAN patients. ELISA was used to determine the serum levels of HD6 in Chinese IgAN patients as Figure 1. Line indicates median with interquartile range. P value analysis: nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U).
Comparison of the high and low serum HD5 levels in IgAN patients.
| Serum HD5 ≥ 11 ng/mL ( | Serum HD5 < 11 ng/mL ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Age (years) | 34.40 ± 7.50 | 29.11 ± 8.73 | 0.144 |
| Serum creatinine ( | 134.5 (101.75, 191.0) | 76.0 (67.0, 96.0) | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 54.51 ± 34.498 | 100.96 ± 27.204 | <0.001 |
| Proteinuria (g/24 h) | 2.53 (0.732, 4.717) | 0.803 (0.658, 1.742) | 0.007 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 0.836 (0.824, 2.623) | 0.836 (0.824, 1.385) | 0.761 |
| Mesangial hypercellularity | 0.017 | ||
| M0 | 11 (44%) | 3 (10.71%) | |
| M1 | 14 (56%) | 25 (89.29%) | |
| Segmental glomerulosclerosis | 0.648 | ||
| S0 | 22 (88%) | 25 (89.29%) | |
| S1 | 3 (12%) | 3 (10.71%) | |
| Endocapillary hypercellularity | 0.957 | ||
| E0 | 6 (24%) | 9 (32.14%) | |
| E1 | 19 (76%) | 19 (67.86%) | |
| Tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis | 0.023 | ||
| T0 | 11 (44%) | 24 (85.71%) | |
| T1 | 9 (36%) | 4 (14.29%) | |
| T2 | 5 (20%) | 0 (0%) | |
|
| |||
| ARB and/or ACE-I | 20 (80%) | 23 (82.14%) | 0.621 |
| Corticosteroid | 7 (28%) | 8 (28.57%) | 0.897 |
| Immunosuppressive drug | 1 (4%) | 1 (3.57%) | 0.956 |
|
|
|
| |
| Observation period (months) | 30.30 ± 16.94 | 39.21 ± 16.25 | 0.102 |
| Serum creatinine ( | 145 (114, 307.75) | 78 (65, 110) | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 48.03 ± 32.79 | 92.25 ± 33.12 | <0.001 |
All data are mean ± SD or number of patients (%, ratio of group). Two groups are assessed by the t-test, Mann-Whitney test, or chi-square test.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier analysis of cumulative renal survival of patients with IgAN based on the serum HD5 level at renal biopsy. Survival curves significantly differ (log-rank test, chi − square test = 0.870, P = 0.009).
Multivariate Cox regression analysis for renal prognosis according to serum HD5.
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted | 1.373 (1.090, 1.730) | 0.007 |
| Adjusted | ||
| Model 1 | 1.247 (1.070, 1.455) | 0.005 |
| Model 2 | 1.242 (1.062, 1.453) | 0.007 |
| Model 3 | 1.239 (1.022, 1.503) | 0.029 |
Abbreviation: CI: confidence interval. Model 1 was adjusted for age and gender. Model 2 was adjusted as Model 1 plus baseline eGFR log transformed proteinuria (24 hr) and tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis. Model 3 was adjusted as Model 2 plus log transformed CRP.
Figure 4Expression levels of HD5 in the kidney of IgAN. Human kidney labeled for HD5 (red), proximal tubule marker AQP-1 (green), and nuclei (blue). HD5 (red) showed production in the damaged proximal tubules with the exception of normal proximal tubules (arrow). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 5Western blot analysis of serum HD5 in normal controls (N) and IgAN patients (I).