Literature DB >> 32089473

Intramedullary nailing versus a locking compression plate for humeral shaft fracture (AO/OTA 12-A and B): A retrospective study.

Ruipeng Zhang1, Yingchao Yin1, Shilun Li1, Zhiyong Hou1, Lin Jin1, Yingze Zhang2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There has been great progress in surgical techniques for treating humeral shaft fractures over the past few decades. The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locking compression plate (LCP) for humeral shaft fractures (AO/OTA 12-A and B). HYPOTHESIS: Compared with LCP, better therapeutic effects could be obtained with less invasive IMN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a humeral shaft fracture who received anterograde IMN or LCP fixation in our institution from December 2011 to June 2016 were reviewed in this study. They were divided into two groups according to the different fixation methods: Group A (IMN) and Group B (LCP). The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications of the patients were reviewed. Fracture healing was evaluated by radiographs performed at each follow-up. The functional outcome was assessed by the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) scoring system at the final follow-up.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients in Group A and forty-six patients in Group B were included in this study. Mean incision length and blood loss in Group B were greater than those in Group A (p<0.001). The average surgical times were 118.53minutes in Group A and 128.91minutes in Group B (p=0.114). The mean DASH scores were 23.76±16.78 in Group A and 22.37±15.18 in Group B (p=0.609). The complication rates were 8/34 in Group A and 7/46 in Group B, respectively (p=0.887). DISCUSSION: The study hypothesis was partially confirmed. Although IMN was a less invasive technique, similar therapeutic results were obtained for humeral shaft fractures (AO/OTA 12-A and B) fixed with two surgical methods. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparison; Humeral shaft fracture; Intramedullary nail (IMN); Locking compression plate (LCP)

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32089473     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  3 in total

1.  WHICH SURGICAL TREATMENT IS PREFERABLE IN HUMERAL DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Authors:  Michela Saracco; Camillo Fulchignoni; Fabrizio Fusco; Giandomenico Logroscino
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-25

Review 2.  Complications in humeral shaft fractures - non-union, iatrogenic radial nerve palsy, and postoperative infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Anna Smolle; Sandra Bösmüller; Paul Puchwein; Martin Ornig; Andreas Leithner; Franz-Josef Seibert
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 3.  Open plate fixation versus nailing for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised clinical trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Frank Joseph Paulus Beeres; Nicole van Veelen; Roderick Marijn Houwert; Björn Christian Link; Marilyn Heng; Matthias Knobe; Rolf Hendrik Herman Groenwold; Reto Babst; Bryan Joost Marinus van de Wall
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.374

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.