Literature DB >> 32088995

High Flow Nasal Therapy Use in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD and Bronchiectasis: A Feasibility Study.

Claudia Crimi1, Alberto Noto2, Andrea Cortegiani3, Raffaele Campisi1, Enrico Heffler4,5, Cesare Gregoretti3, Nunzio Crimi1,6.   

Abstract

The efficacy and feasibility of high flow nasal therapy (HFNT) use in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and bronchiectasis is unknown. We performed a single-center, single-arm prospective observational study in patients with AECOPD, documented bronchiectasis, pH ≥ 7.35, respiratory rate (RR) ≥ 26 breaths/minute despite receiving maximal medical treatment and oxygen via face mask up to 10 L/m. Patients received HFNT (Airvo 2, Fisher & Paykel) at a gas flow of 50 L/min and FIO2 adjusted to maintain SpO2 ≥92%. Dyspnea, rated by Borg scale, RR, arterial blood gases and mucus production (ranging from 1 to 3) were collected before and 1 h after starting HFNT and then every 24 h for 3 days. Tolerance was measured using a visual analogic scale (VAS). Fifteen patients were enrolled. After 24 h, patients showed a significant improvement in dyspnea score [Borg scale from 6.7 ± 1.4 to 4.1 ± 1.3 (p<.001)]; RR decreased from 29.6 ± 2.7 breaths/min to 23.2 ± 2.9 breaths/min (p<.001); pCO2 significantly decreased after 24 h [58.4 ± 13 vs. 51.7 ± 8.2 (p=.003)] while quantity of mucus production increased [(1.1 ± 0,6 vs. 2.4 ± 0.7, p<.001)]. No patient received invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Overall VAS score for HFNT tolerance was 6.5. HFNT was effective in improving dyspnea score, decreasing RR, improving gas exchange, and increasing mucus production in patients with AECOPD and coexisting bronchiectasis. Moreover, no safety concerns on its use were detected. Nevertheless, due to the single-arm design, the effect of HFNT could not be isolated from standard pharmacological treatment due to the study design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COPD; High flow nasal cannula; acute respiratory failure; bronchiectasis; humidification; mucus plug; sputum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32088995     DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1728736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  COPD        ISSN: 1541-2563            Impact factor:   2.409


  5 in total

1.  High flow nasal therapy versus noninvasive ventilation as initial ventilatory strategy in COPD exacerbation: a multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial.

Authors:  Andrea Cortegiani; Federico Longhini; Fabiana Madotto; Paolo Groff; Raffaele Scala; Claudia Crimi; Annalisa Carlucci; Andrea Bruni; Eugenio Garofalo; Santi Maurizio Raineri; Roberto Tonelli; Vittoria Comellini; Enrico Lupia; Luigi Vetrugno; Enrico Clini; Antonino Giarratano; Stefano Nava; Paolo Navalesi; Cesare Gregoretti
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  The role of high-flow nasal therapy in bronchiectasis: a post hoc analysis.

Authors:  William R Good; Jeffrey Garrett; Hans U P Hockey; Lata Jayaram; Conroy Wong; Harold Rea
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-02-08

3.  Comparison of Actual Performance in the Flow and Fraction of Inspired O2 among Different High-Flow Nasal Cannula Devices: A Bench Study.

Authors:  Yuyan Zhou; Zhong Ni; Yuenan Ni; Binmiao Liang; Zongan Liang
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.409

4.  The Use of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in the Management of Severe Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Pervin Hancı; Serpil Öcal; Esat Kıvanç Kaya; Arzu Topeli
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2022-09

5.  High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for admitted COPD-patients. A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Pieter Veenstra; Nic J G M Veeger; Ralph J H Koppers; Marieke L Duiverman; Wouter H van Geffen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.