Literature DB >> 32088923

Smartphone Thermography for Lower Extremity Local Flap Perforator Mapping.

Nicolás Pereira1,2, Geoffrey G Hallock3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The versatile application of local perforator flaps for coverage throughout the lower extremity has already been well proven. Often a "free-style" approach has been used to design these flaps, as conventional imaging devices for perforator identification may be too expensive or unavailable. The recent adaptation of Smartphone thermal digital imaging may now prove to be a cheaper and more readily available means for identifying the requisite perforators that will sustain these local flaps.
METHODS: Over the past year, a prospective study was undertaken of all patients having a local perforator flap for coverage of a lower extremity defect. Twenty-eight local perforator flaps involving all subtypes were utilized in 25 patients. Smartphone thermography was used in all patients preoperatively to identify preferable perforator or vascular network "hot spots" that allowed appropriate flap design. Intraoperative and postoperative monitoring was similarly done for all flaps to determine outcomes.
RESULTS: All local perforator flaps were based on perforators identified using smartphone thermography. All flaps (23 or 82.1%) that the thermal digital image predicted 100% viability totally survived. Five flaps were predicted to have marginal viability, but two nevertheless survived completely while the others required only minor readjustments. Peninsular and keystone variety perforator flaps were those most commonly used.Thermography always facilitated making the correct decision as to whether a proximal- or distal-based peninsular flap would be superior. Subfascial elevation of cool spots in keystone flaps were found to be least likely to interfere with flap perfusion.
CONCLUSION: Smartphone thermography is an inexpensive and expeditious means for identification of "hot spots" that is always used by us to ensure perfusion to lower extremity perforator local flaps. This is a complementary technique for their safer design, harvest, and subsequent monitoring in conjunction with more complex screening tools as indicated. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32088923     DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  6 in total

Review 1.  Smartphone Thermal Imaging Can Enable the Safer Use of Propeller Flaps.

Authors:  Geoffrey G Hallock
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  How to Design and Harvest a Propeller Flap.

Authors:  Marco Pignatti; Valentina Pinto; Ann-Charlott Docherty Skogh; Federico Armando Giorgini; Riccardo Cipriani; Giorgio De Santis; Geoffrey G Hallock
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

Authors:  Mohamed A Ellabban; Ahmed I Awad; Geoffrey G Hallock
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap: A Historical Trek from Ignominious to "Workhorse".

Authors:  Geoffrey G Hallock
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2022-04-06

5.  Stress detection and monitoring based on low-cost mobile thermography.

Authors:  Katarzyna Baran
Journal:  Procedia Comput Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

6.  Application of the Jigsaw Puzzle Flap Based on Freestyle Perforators to Repair Large and Deep Ulcers on the Buttocks.

Authors:  Xiaoming Chen; Biao Huang; Haitao Xiao; Lu An; Wenxing Su; Daojiang Yu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.