Literature DB >> 32088710

Glycosylated Hemoglobin as a Surrogate for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Cardiovascular Outcome Trials Comparing New Antidiabetic Drugs to Placebo.

Pierre Ambrosi1,2, Aurélie Daumas3, Patrick Villani3, Roch Giorgi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The value of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a surrogate marker for the prevention of cardiovascular outcomes on antidiabetic drugs is debated. The 2008 FDA guidance led to multiple large clinical trials to evaluate the effect of new antidiabetic drugs versus placebo on major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between MACE and HbA1c decrease between antidiabetic drug and placebo across the spectrum of cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT).
METHODS: In this systematic review, we included randomized controlled trials that compared an antidiabetic drug to placebo in addition to current standard of care with the primary intention of demonstrating cardiovascular safety. We investigated the relationship between MACE decrease on antidiabetic drug and HbA1c reduction on antidiabetic drug using the coefficient correlation. We also studied the effects of potential confounders on MACE decrease.
RESULTS: Fourteen eligible trials including 128,149 patients were included, 12,114 of whom experienced MACE. Mean achieved HbA1c absolute reductions on antidiabetic treatment versus placebo varied from 0.29 to 1%. The decrease of MACE on antidiabetic drug was significantly correlated with mean HbA1c reduction (r = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67-0.96, p < 0.001) and weight loss (r = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.46-0.94, p < 0.001). In a bivariate model including weight loss, only HbA1c reduction remained significantly correlated with the decrease of MACE on antidiabetic drug (p = 0.019).
CONCLUSION: Across CVOT, the decrease in MACE incidence on various antidiabetic drugs is significantly correlated with HbA1c reduction. This meta-analysis supports HbA1c as an appropriate surrogate endpoint for cardiovascular events. Our analysis supports that changes in HbA1c should be taken into account while interpreting effects of new antidiabetic drugs on cardiovascular outcomes.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antidiabetic drugs; Diabetes; Glycosylated hemoglobin; Major adverse cardiac events; Placebo

Year:  2020        PMID: 32088710     DOI: 10.1159/000506004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  2 in total

1.  Effect of different antidiabetic medications on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score among patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus: A multicenter non-interventional observational study.

Authors:  Syed Wasif Gillani; Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman; Vineetha Menon; Nazeerullah Rahamathullah; Riham Mohamed Elshafie; Hassaan Anwer Rathore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  Is HbA1c a valid surrogate for mortality in type 2 diabetes? Evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Christina Baechle; Wiebke Scherler; Alexander Lang; Tim Filla; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.087

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.