Bernard H E Jansen1, Pim J van Leeuwen2, Maurits Wondergem3, Tim M van der Sluis4, Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen4, Remco J J Knol3, Reindert J A van Moorselaar4, Henk G van der Poel4, Daniela E Oprea-Lager5, André N Vis4. 1. Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: bh.jansen@amsterdamumc.nl. 2. Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands. 4. Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after curative radiotherapy is defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise of ≥2 ng/ml above the nadir ("Phoenix criteria", 2005). With the introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET), the ability to localise PCa recurrences has increased markedly. Here, we reviewed 315 patients scanned with PSMA-PET after curative radiotherapy in the Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam (2015-2018). Sixty-three patients (20.3%) were scanned below the Phoenix threshold (PSA rise <2.0 ng/ml). In 53 of these patients (84.1%), PSMA-PET-avid lesions were detected nonetheless: 21 patients (33.3%) revealed a local recurrence as a single site of disease, 32 patients (50.8%) harboured metastatic PCa. Besides rising PSA, no predictors were identified that prompted early PSMA-PET imaging. In this communication, we report on the frequent detection of metastatic PCa with PSMA-PET in men below the Phoenix PSA threshold. These findings are a plea for re-evaluation of current diagnostic work-up for rising PSA values after radiotherapy, as early detection of recurrences might refine salvage and/or adjuvant therapies. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study reports on the unexpected detection of prostate cancer (PCa) recurrences with prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in patients treated with radiotherapy. This calls for re-evaluation of the current criteria for recurrent PCa after radiotherapy.
Biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after curative radiotherapy is defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise of ≥2 ng/ml above the nadir ("Phoenix criteria", 2005). With the introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET), the ability to localise PCa recurrences has increased markedly. Here, we reviewed 315 patients scanned with PSMA-PET after curative radiotherapy in the Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam (2015-2018). Sixty-three patients (20.3%) were scanned below the Phoenix threshold (PSA rise <2.0 ng/ml). In 53 of these patients (84.1%), PSMA-PET-avid lesions were detected nonetheless: 21 patients (33.3%) revealed a local recurrence as a single site of disease, 32 patients (50.8%) harboured metastatic PCa. Besides rising PSA, no predictors were identified that prompted early PSMA-PET imaging. In this communication, we report on the frequent detection of metastatic PCa with PSMA-PET in men below the Phoenix PSA threshold. These findings are a plea for re-evaluation of current diagnostic work-up for rising PSA values after radiotherapy, as early detection of recurrences might refine salvage and/or adjuvant therapies. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study reports on the unexpected detection of prostate cancer (PCa) recurrences with prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in patients treated with radiotherapy. This calls for re-evaluation of the current criteria for recurrent PCa after radiotherapy.
Authors: Morgan Michalet; Olivier Riou; Jeremy Cottet-Moine; Florence Castan; Sophie Gourgou; Simon Valdenaire; Pierre Debuire; Norbert Ailleres; Roxana Draghici; Marie Charissoux; Carmen Llacer Moscardo; Marie-Pierre Farcy-Jacquet; Pascal Fenoglietto; David Azria Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Wietske I Luining; Matthijs C F Cysouw; Dennie Meijer; N Harry Hendrikse; Ronald Boellaard; André N Vis; Daniela E Oprea-Lager Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Shafak Aluwini; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Hilda de Barros; Niven Mehra; Herman Stoevelaar; Derya Yakar; Henk van der Poel Journal: BJUI Compass Date: 2021-02-03
Authors: Wei Liu; Andrew Loblaw; David Laidley; Hatim Fakir; Lucas Mendez; Melanie Davidson; Zahra Kassam; Ting-Yim Lee; Aaron Ward; Jonathan Thiessen; Jane Bayani; John Conyngham; Laura Bailey; Joseph D Andrews; Glenn Bauman Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 5.738