Literature DB >> 32088075

Locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures in patients older than 60 years continues to be associated with a high complication rate.

Jonathan D Barlow1, Anthony L Logli2, Scott P Steinmann2, Stephen A Sems2, William W Cross2, Brandon J Yuan2, Michael E Torchia2, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Locking plate technology has increased the frequency of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fractures (PHF). A number of technical pearls have been recommended to lower the complication rate of ORIF. These pearls are particularly relevant for patients aged >60 years, when nonoperative treatment and arthroplasty are alternatives commonly considered. There have been few large, single-center studies on the modern application of this technology.
METHODS: Between 2005 and 2015, a total of 173 PHFs in patients aged >60 years were treated at our institution with ORIF using locking plates. Failure was defined as reoperation or radiographic evidence of failure. Average follow-up was 6.1 years.
RESULTS: There was an overall complication rate of 44%. The overall failure rate was 34% and correlated with fracture type: 26% failure rate in 2-part fractures (16 failures), 39% in 3-part fractures (23 failures), and 45% in 4-part fractures (11 failures). There was no difference between the failure rate with and without fibular allograft (33% vs. 34%). Most patients with radiographic or clinical failure did not undergo reoperation. The overall reoperation rate was 11% (14 patients). Seven percent of 2-part fractures (4 shoulders), 14% of 3-part fractures (8 shoulders), and 18% of 4-part fractures (2 shoulders) required reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: ORIF of PHFs with locking plates in patients aged >60 years resulted in a 44% complication and 34% failure rate. There was a trend toward higher complication and failure rates in older patients and more complex fractures. Refinement in fixation techniques and indications are necessary to optimize the surgical management of PHFs.
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neer classification; Proximal humerus fracture; elderly fracture; locking plates; open reduction internal fixation (ORIF); pathologic fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32088075     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  15 in total

1.  The Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Josef Stolberg-Stolberg; Jeanette Köppe; Robert Rischen; Moritz Freistühler; Andreas Faldum; J Christoph Katthagen; Michael J Raschke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  No change in outcome ten years following locking plate repair of displaced proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Rachel Ranson; Rachel Roller; Nicket Dedhia; Connor P Littlefield; Sanjit Konda; Joseph D Zuckerman; Kenneth Egol
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-20

Review 3.  [Research progress on medial support augmentation of plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures].

Authors:  Zuhao Chang; Wei Zhang; Peifu Tang; Hua Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-03-15

4.  In-hospital Complications Are More Likely to Occur After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Than After Locked Plating for Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Jeanette Köppe; Josef Stolberg-Stolberg; Robert Rischen; Andreas Faldum; Michael J Raschke; J Christoph Katthagen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  PHILOS plate fixation with polymethyl methacrylate cement augmentation of an osteoporotic proximal humerus fracture.

Authors:  Do-Young Kim; Tae-Yeong Kim; Jung-Taek Hwang
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2020-09-01

6.  Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Daniel R Evans; Eliana B Saltzman; Albert T Anastasio; Ndeye F Guisse; Elshaday S Belay; Tyler S Pidgeon; Marc J Richard; David S Ruch; Oke A Anakwenze; Mark J Gage; Christopher S Klifto
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-12-16

7.  Nonsensus in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures: uncontrolled, blinded, comparative behavioural analysis between Homo chirurgicus accidentus and Macaca sylvanus.

Authors:  Sam Razaeian; Birgitt Wiese; Dafang Zhang; Afif Harb; Christian Krettek; Nael Hawi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-12-14

8.  Anatomical study for the treatment of proximal humeral fracture through the medial approach.

Authors:  Hao Xiang; Yan Wang; Yongliang Yang; Fanxiao Liu; Qingsen Lu; Lingpeng Kong; Mingzhen Li; Yong Han; Fu Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Proximal humeral fracture locking plate fixation with anatomic reduction, and a short-and-cemented-screws configuration, dramatically reduces the implant related failure rate in elderly patients.

Authors:  Antonio M Foruria; Natalia Martinez-Catalan; María Valencia; Diana Morcillo; Emilio Calvo
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-08-06

10.  No change in reoperation rates despite shifting treatment trends: a population-based study of 4,070 proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Carl Bergdahl; David Wennergren; Eleonora Swensson-Backelin; Jan Ekelund; Michael Möller
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.