| Literature DB >> 32087722 |
Katherine J Whitman1, James L Bono2, Michael L Clawson3, John D Loy4, Joseph M Bosilevac3, Terrance M Arthur3, Jeff D Ondrak5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In a beef cattle facility an outbreak of abortions occurred over a 36-day period and included samples from two aborted (non-viable) fetuses and 21 post-abortion clinical cases. There are numerous etiologies, including clinical listeriosis. At the species level, Listeria monocytogenes is ubiquitous in cattle production environments, including soil, feed, and occasionally water sources, and is a common enteric resident of cattle and other mammals. There are four genetically distinct lineages of L. monocytogenes (I-IV), with most lineage III and IV isolates obtained from ruminants. Definitive diagnosis of L. monocytogenes as a causative agent in disease outbreaks relies upon case identification, appropriate sample collection, and laboratory confirmation. Furthermore, clearly establishing a relationship between a pathogen source and clinical disease is difficult.Entities:
Keywords: Cattle abortion; Listeriosis; Outbreak; Silage; Whole-genome sequencing
Year: 2020 PMID: 32087722 PMCID: PMC7036198 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-2276-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Layout of operation and feed pathway from shared feed location
Descriptive statistics relative to the female population over the calving season
| Category | Total Population | Season Abortion Count | Season Abortion % | Day 1–12 Abortion Count | % Total Abortions Occurring Day 1–12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mature Cows | 3633 | 4 | 0.1% | 0 | 0 |
| Heifers | 936 | 28 | 3.0% | 24 | 89% |
| Total | 4569 | 31 | 0.7% | 24 | 77% |
| Site A | 369 | 17 | 4.6% | 16 | 94% |
| Site B | 283 | 3 | 1.1% | 3 | 100% |
| Site C | 284 | 8 | 2.8% | 5 | 71% |
Descriptive statistics of clinical submissions
| Sample ID | Sample Type | Site Location | Aerobic Culture | LM PCR | LM Culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | A | + | ||
| 2 | F | B | + | ||
| 3 | S | A | – | – | – |
| 4 | P | A | + | ||
| 5 | S | A | + | ||
| 6 | S | A | – | – | – |
| 7 | S | A | + | ||
| 8 | S | A | + | ||
| 9 | P | A | – | + | |
| 10 | S | A | – | – | – |
| 11 | P | C | + | ||
| 12 | P | C | + | ||
| 13 | P | A | + | ||
| 14 | P | A | + | ||
| 15 | P | A | + | ||
| 16 | P | A | + | ||
| 17 | P | A | + | ||
| 18 | S | A | – | – | – |
| 19 | S | C | – | + | |
| 20 | S | A | + | ||
| 21 | S | C | + | ||
| 22 | P | C | + | ||
| 23 | P | A | + |
LM L. monocytogenes, F Fetal tissues, P Retained fetal membranes, S Cervico-vaginal (CV) swabs
Summary of L. monocytogenes water samples
| Sample | Site | Direct LM PCR | Enriched LM PCR | Enriched LM Culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tank 1 | A | |||
| Tank 2 | ||||
| Tank 3 | ||||
| Tank 4 | C | |||
| Hole 5a | ||||
| Hole 6 | B | |||
| Hole 7 | B | |||
| Hole 8 | C | |||
| Hole 9 | C |
aCulture positive for L. innocua-not sequenced
Summary of L. monocytogenes positive feed samples
| Sample timing | Pile location | pH | LM culture | LM PCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 1 | 4.54 | + | + |
| 1st | 10 | 8.09 | + | + |
| 2nd | 1 | 7.09 | + | + |
| 2nd | 5 | 4.34 | + | + |
Sample timing: 2nd sample collected 10 days after 1st sample. All positive samples were from corn silage. Pile location is in reference to the position on the silage face (Additional file 1)
Fig. 2Parsnp generated tree of complete closed or draft genomes of L. monocytogenes