Geoffroy Liegeon1, Guillemette Antoni2, Gilles Pialoux3, Catherine Capitant2, Laurent Cotte4, Isabelle Charreau2, Cécile Tremblay5, Eric Cua6, Eric Senneville7, François Raffi8,9, Laurence Meyer2,10, Jean-Michel Molina1,11,12. 1. Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 2. INSERM, Villejuif, France. 3. Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France. 4. Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. 5. Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada. 6. Hôpital de l'Archet, Nice, France. 7. Hôpital G. Dron, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tourcoing, Tourcoing, France. 8. INSERM UIC 143 Nantes University, Nantes, France. 9. Services des Maladies infectieuses, Centre hospitalier universitaire de l'Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France. 10. Université Paris Sud, Paris Saclay, France. 11. Université de Paris Diderot Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France. 12. INSERM UMR 944, Paris, France.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Daily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) is associated with a small but statistically significant decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We assessed the renal safety of on-demand PrEP with TDF/FTC in HIV-1 uninfected men. METHODS: We used data from the randomized double-blind placebo-controlled ANRS-IPERGAY trial and its open-label extension conducted between February 2012 and June 2016 among HIV-uninfected MSM starting on-demand PrEP. Using linear mixed model, we evaluated the mean eGFR decline from baseline over time and determined risks factors associated with eGFR decline during the study. RESULTS: During the blind phase, with a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the mean decline slope of eGFR from baseline was -0.88 and -1.53 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year in the placebo (n = 201) and the TDF/FTC group (n = 198) respectively, with a slope difference of 0.65 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year (p = 0.27). Including both phases, 389 participants started on-demand TDF/FTC with a median follow-up of 19.2 months and a mean decline of eGFR from baseline of -1.14 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year (p < 0.001). The slope of eGFR reduction was not significantly different in participants with baselineeGFR ≤ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.44), age >40 years (p = 0.24) or hypertension (p = 0.21). There was a dose-response relationship between recent tenofovir exposure and lower eGFR when considering the number of pills taken in the two months prior the visit (eGFR difference of -0.88 mL/min/1.73 m2 between >15 pills/month vs. ≤15 pills/month, p < 0.01) or plasma tenofovir concentrations at the visit (eGFR difference compared to ≤2 ng/mL: >2 to ≤10ng/mL: -0.98 mL/min/1.73 m2 , >10 to ≤40ng/mL: -1.28 mL/min/1.73 m2 , >40 ng/mL: -1.82 mL/min/1.73 m2 , p < 0.001). Three participants discontinued TDF/FTC for eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 during the OLE phase. No case of Fanconi syndrome was reported. CONCLUSIONS: The renal safety of on-demand PrEP with TDF/FTC was good. The overall reduction and intermittent exposure to TDF/FTC may explain this good renal safety.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Daily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) is associated with a small but statistically significant decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We assessed the renal safety of on-demand PrEP with TDF/FTC in HIV-1 uninfectedmen. METHODS: We used data from the randomized double-blind placebo-controlled ANRS-IPERGAY trial and its open-label extension conducted between February 2012 and June 2016 among HIV-uninfected MSM starting on-demand PrEP. Using linear mixed model, we evaluated the mean eGFR decline from baseline over time and determined risks factors associated with eGFR decline during the study. RESULTS: During the blind phase, with a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the mean decline slope of eGFR from baseline was -0.88 and -1.53 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year in the placebo (n = 201) and the TDF/FTC group (n = 198) respectively, with a slope difference of 0.65 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year (p = 0.27). Including both phases, 389 participants started on-demand TDF/FTC with a median follow-up of 19.2 months and a mean decline of eGFR from baseline of -1.14 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year (p < 0.001). The slope of eGFR reduction was not significantly different in participants with baseline eGFR ≤ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.44), age >40 years (p = 0.24) or hypertension (p = 0.21). There was a dose-response relationship between recent tenofovir exposure and lower eGFR when considering the number of pills taken in the two months prior the visit (eGFR difference of -0.88 mL/min/1.73 m2 between >15 pills/month vs. ≤15 pills/month, p < 0.01) or plasma tenofovir concentrations at the visit (eGFR difference compared to ≤2 ng/mL: >2 to ≤10ng/mL: -0.98 mL/min/1.73 m2 , >10 to ≤40ng/mL: -1.28 mL/min/1.73 m2 , >40 ng/mL: -1.82 mL/min/1.73 m2 , p < 0.001). Three participants discontinued TDF/FTC for eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 during the OLE phase. No case of Fanconi syndrome was reported. CONCLUSIONS: The renal safety of on-demand PrEP with TDF/FTC was good. The overall reduction and intermittent exposure to TDF/FTC may explain this good renal safety.
Authors: Kenneth K Mugwanya; Christina Wyatt; Connie Celum; Deborah Donnell; James Kiarie; Allan Ronald; Jared M Baeten Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Julia L Marcus; Leo B Hurley; Charles Bradley Hare; Dong Phuong Nguyen; Tony Phengrasamy; Michael J Silverberg; Juliet E Stoltey; Jonathan E Volk Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Vasantha Jotwani; Rebecca Scherzer; David V Glidden; Megha Mehrotra; Patricia Defechereux; Albert Liu; Monica Gandhi; Michael Bennett; Steven G Coca; Chirag R Parikh; Robert M Grant; Michael G Shlipak Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jean-Michel Molina; Catherine Capitant; Bruno Spire; Gilles Pialoux; Laurent Cotte; Isabelle Charreau; Cecile Tremblay; Jean-Marie Le Gall; Eric Cua; Armelle Pasquet; François Raffi; Claire Pintado; Christian Chidiac; Julie Chas; Pierre Charbonneau; Constance Delaugerre; Marie Suzan-Monti; Benedicte Loze; Julien Fonsart; Gilles Peytavin; Antoine Cheret; Julie Timsit; Gabriel Girard; Nicolas Lorente; Marie Préau; James F Rooney; Mark A Wainberg; David Thompson; Willy Rozenbaum; Veronique Doré; Lucie Marchand; Marie-Christine Simon; Nicolas Etien; Jean-Pierre Aboulker; Laurence Meyer; Jean-François Delfraissy Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kenneth Mugwanya; Jared Baeten; Connie Celum; Deborah Donnell; Thomas Nickolas; Nelly Mugo; Andrea Branch; Jordan Tappero; James Kiarie; Allan Ronald; Michael Yin; Christina Wyatt Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Michael S Saag; Constance A Benson; Rajesh T Gandhi; Jennifer F Hoy; Raphael J Landovitz; Michael J Mugavero; Paul E Sax; Davey M Smith; Melanie A Thompson; Susan P Buchbinder; Carlos Del Rio; Joseph J Eron; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Huldrych F Günthard; Jean-Michel Molina; Donna M Jacobsen; Paul A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Amanda Mocroft; Jens D Lundgren; Michael Ross; Christoph A Fux; Peter Reiss; Olivier Moranne; Philippe Morlat; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Ole Kirk; Lene Ryom Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Amy C Justice; Matthew B Goetz; Cameron N Stewart; Brenna C Hogan; Elizabeth Humes; Paula M Luz; Jessica L Castilho; Denis Nash; Ellen Brazier; Beverly Musick; Constantin Yiannoutsos; Karen Malateste; Antoine Jaquet; Morna Cornell; Tinei Shamu; Reena Rajasuriar; Awachana Jiamsakul; Keri N Althoff Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 16.070
Authors: Robin Schaefer; Pedro Henrique Amparo da Costa Leite; Ronaldo Silva; Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Christopher Akolo; Carlos F Cáceres; Inês Dourado; Kimberly Green; Anita Hettema; Elske Hoornenborg; Smarajit Jana; Bernhard Kerschberger; Hally Mahler; Sindy Matse; Hamish McManus; Jean-Michel Molina; Sushena Reza-Paul; Iskandar Azwa; Maryam Shahmanesh; Doug Taylor; Hamid Vega-Ramirez; Valdiléa G Veloso; Rachel Baggaley; Shona Dalal Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 16.070